Skip to main content

The “Cultural” of Production and Career

  • Chapter
Behind the Screen

Part of the book series: Global Cinema ((GLOBALCINE))

  • 1165 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores some of the central cultural tenets of career and filmmaking among the Danish film industry elite or what is inelegantly and somewhat grammatically incorrectly referred to as “the ‘cultural’ of production and career” in this chapter’s title. The theory behind this formulation is that it focuses attention on the ideational dimensions of culture in the Danish film industry, especially as derived from reflections on work and career by those working in that industry. In this sense, the approach, though less inclusive and ambitious, resembles Caldwell’s interest in “‘indigenous’ interpretive frameworks” in Production Culture.’ This chapter also argues that production and career decisions and actions are inextricably linked. Sometimes the two are consciously and obviously linked in terms of the implications that working on a given film with given people in a given manner, etc., will have on one’s further work opportunities. Or, the converse, career considerations can affect how films are made in terms of who works on them and what resources, skills, tastes, and perspectives are brought into and used in a production. Sometimes the interrelation of these considerations remains latent. This chapter explores how certain cultural issues underpinning inter-occupational collaboration, especially deference, occupational respect and integrity, and occupational revitalization in particular, support forms of these mutually intertwined considerations. This chapter also focuses on how the content of several of these cultural considerations supports a particular form of auteur ideology and practice in the Danish film industry and shows how this ideology is made up of discrete cultural components that secure expressive space for A-function holders rather than a hierarchically imposed command-and-control coordinating regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John T. Caldwell, Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008), 14.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourdieu has written extensively about the notion of reproduction in cultural life and displayed the means by which established tastes, preferences, behaviors, and practices are socially conveyed and reinforced. See Pierre Bourdieu and Jean Claude Passeron, Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, 2nd ed. (New York: Sage, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Richard Nice (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984). With regards to film, Bechky has analyzed the mechanisms of role performance and norm reproduction that make the film production routine possible.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Beth Bechky, “Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations,” Organization Science 17, no. 1 (2006): 3–21. As opposed to reproduction, production involves the creation and invocation of relatively novel behaviors, practices, ideas, entities, etc. Filmmaking, like all aspects of social life, is rife with both.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. For a seminal review, see Richard A. Peterson and N. Anand, “The Production of Culture Perspective,” Annual Review of Sociology 30 (2004): 311–334. Peterson and Anand also take up a third central sociological dichotomy regarding the concept of production, link it to deliberate calculated creation, and juxtapose it with spontaneous or “authentic” expression.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkinson writes: “There are two distinct elements in the organization and structuring of production: mutual interests and relative power.” Frank Wilkinson, “Productive Systems and the Structuring Role of Economic and Social Theories,” in Systems of Production. Markets, Organisations and Performance, eds Brendan Burchell, Simon Deakin, Jonathan Michie, and Jill Rubery (London: Routledge, 2003), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michael Arthur, Douglas Hall, and Barbara Lawrence, eds, “Generating New Directions in Career Theory: The Case for a Transdisciplinary Approach,” in The Handbook of Career Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chris Mathieu, ed., “Careers in Creative Industries: An Analytical Overview,” in Careers in Creative Industries (New York: Routledge, 2012), 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniel Bertaux, “Social Genealogies Commented on and Compared: An Instrument for Observing Social Mobility Processes in the ‘Longue Durée’,” Current Sociology 43, no. 2(1995): 69–88;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daniel Bertaux and Martin Kohli, “The Life Story Approach: A Continental View,” Annual Review of Sociology10 (1984): 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jesper S. Pedersen and Chris Mathieu, “Udviklingstræk I dansk film 1995–2007,” in Dansk film I krydsfeltet mellem samarbejde og konkurrence, eds Chris Mathieu and Jesper S. Pedersen (Lund: Ariadne förlag, 2009), 15–35. See also recent Danish film successes at the Academy Awards and European Film Awards (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chris Mathieu and Sara Malou Strandvad, “Is This What We Should Be Comparing When Comparing Film Production Regimes? A Systematic Typological Scheme,” Creative Industries Journal 1 (2008): 171–192;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sara Malou Strandvad and Chris Mathieu, “Den danske model-hvad bestär den af’?,” in Dansk film I krydsfeltet mellem samarbejde og konkurrence, eds Chris Mathieu and Jesper S. Pedersen (Lund: Ariadne förlag, 2009), 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  14. William H. Sewell, Jr, Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), 174.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Paul DiMaggio, “Why Cognitive (and Cultural) Sociology Needs Cognitive Psychology,” in Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognition, ed. Karen A. Cerulo (New York: Routledge, 2002), 274–275.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ann Swidler, “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies,” American Sociological Review 51 (1986): 273–286;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ann Swidler, Talk of Love: How Culture Matters (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hans Joas, The Creativity of Action (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mette Hjort, Lone Scherfig’s “Italian for Beginners” (Seattle: University of Washington Press; Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, 2010);

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mette Hjort, Small Nation, Global Cinema (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005);

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mette Hjort, Dekalog 01: On the Five Obstructions (London: Wallflower Press, 2008);

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mette Hjort and Scott MacKenzie, Purity and Provocation: Dogme 95 (London: The British Film Institute Publications, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chris Mathieu, “Transforming the Danish Film Field via ‘Professionalization; Penetration and Integration,’” Creativity and Innovation Management 18 (2006): 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Michael Patrick Allen and Anne E. Lincoln, “Critical Discourse and the Cultural Consecration of American Films,” Social Forces 82, no. 3 (March 2004): 887. For recent treatments of auteur theory, see Caldwell, Production Culture; for the Danish case, Sara Malou Strandvad, “Organizing for the Auteur: A Dual Case Study of Debut Filmmaking,” working paper 2011;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alexander Hicks and Velina Petrova, “Auteur Discourse and the Cultural Consecration of American Films,” Poetics 34 (2006): 180–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Heidi Philipsen, Dansk films nye bolge—afsæt og aftryk fra den Danske Filmskole; see also Heidi Philipsen, “Spilleregler I filmskabelse—behjælpelige begrænsninger,” in Dansk film I krydsfeltet mellem samarbejde og konkurrence, eds Chris Mathieu and Jesper S. Pedersen (Lund: Ariadne förlag, 2009), 145–172.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wayne Baker and Robert Faulkner, “Role as Resource in the Hollywood Film Industry,” American Journal of Sociology 97 (1991): 279–309. This article deals with different roles than the ones that are given primary focus here. Even though the structural and historical context is also quite different, the process and concept of role consolidation is analytically applicable in any film industry.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anne Lincoln and Michael P. Allen, “Oscar et César: Deep Consecration in French and American Film Acting Careers,” Careers in Creative Industries, ed. Chris Mathieu (NewYork: Routledge, 2012), 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Petr Szczepanik Patrick Vonderau

Copyright information

© 2013 Petr Szczepanik and Patrick Vonderau

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mathieu, C. (2013). The “Cultural” of Production and Career. In: Szczepanik, P., Vonderau, P. (eds) Behind the Screen. Global Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282187_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics