Abstract
Is religion a threat to constitutionalism? Does it steer the secular legal system toward compromises and concessions? Why are some secular states unable to accommodate religious pluralism? In recent years, spirited debates related to these questions have been energized by proposals to introduce a sharia tribunal or court in Canada and the UK. These proposals have been encouraged by the ability since the early 1990s of Jewish and Catholic groups in Ontario, Canada, to arbitration mechanisms rooted in their religious frameworks. The Jewish Court in Toronto, Beith Din, has been operating for many years. Instructively, the use of religious arbitration mechanisms by religious communities only generated public debate when Muslim leaders requested the same rights as Jews and Catholics. In 2005, Ontario officials were forced to decide whether to establish a sharia tribunal for Muslims or scrap religious family courts altogether. Eventually, the Premier, Dalton McGuinty decided that “there will be no Shari’a law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians.”1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
ZZ Alfitri. 2008. “Religious Liberty in Indonesia and the Rights of ‘Deviant’ Sects.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 3 (1): 1–27.
The Amendment of the 1945 Constitution
Armstrong, Karen. 2003. “Faith and Freedom.” The Guardian, Thursday, May 8, 2003.
Artiste, Barry. 2005. “Mcguinty Rules Out Use of Shari’a Law in Ontario.” Available at http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews /1126472943217_26/?hub=TopStories.
Baso, Ahmad. 2004. “UU NO.l/PNPS/1965 dan Soal Agama Resmi’ Itu: Sebuah Tatapan untuk JPS.” Paper presented for Rakernas “Perencanaan Strategis Jaringan” Pokja-pokja Jamaah Persaudaraan Sejati di Puncak, Ciloto, July 28–31, 2004.
Berger, Peter. 1998. “Protestantism and the Quest for Certainty.” Christian Century, 115 (23): 782.
Biro Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2000. Available at http://www.bps.go.id/sector/population/pop2000.htm.
Casanova, Jose. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Church of the New Faith. 1983. 57 ALJR 785.
Coorey, Phillip. 2008. “Australia Rejects Call for Islamic Courts.” Available at http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/australia-rejects-call-for -islamic-courts/2008/02/08/1202234167178.html.
Crouch, Melissa. 2007 “Regulating Places of Worship in Indonesia: Upholding Freedom of Religion for Religious Minorities?” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (July): 96–116.
Durkheim, Emile. 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, a Study in Religious Sociology. London: G. Allen & Unwin.
Fealy, Greg, and Virginia Hooker. 2006. Voices of Islam in Southeast Asia: A Contemporary Sourcebook. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS).
Gazi, Faisal. 2009. “The First Muslim Secularist.” The Guardian, April 9, 2009.
Herald Sun. 2011. “Muslim Body Wants ‘Moderate’ Sharia Law But Government Rejects Plan.” Herald Sun, May 17, 2011. Available at http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/muslim-body-wants-moderate-sh aria-law/story-e6frf716–1226057280606.
Hollenbach, David. 1997 “Politically Active Churches: Some Empirical Prolegomena to a Normative Approach.” In Paul J. Weithman (ed.), Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, p. 301. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hosen, Nadirsyah. 2004. “In Search of Islamic Constitutionalism.” The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 21 (2): 1–24.
—. 2005. “Religion and the Indonesian Constitution: A Recent. Debate.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 36 (3): 419–40.
—. 2007. Shari’a and Constitutional Reform in Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS.
Kim, Hyung-Jun. 1998. “The Changing Interpretation of Religious Freedom in Indonesia.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 29 (2): 357.
Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. 2009. No 140/PUU-VII/2009. Available at Bahasa: http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/putusan /putusan_sidang_Putusan%20PUU%20140_Senin%2019%20April%20 2010.pdf
Korteweg, Anna C. 2008. “The Shari’a Debate in Ontario: Gender, Islam, and Representations of Muslim Women’s Agency.” Gender & Society, 22 (4): 434–454.
Kuru, Ahmet. 2009. Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Law No. 7 of 1989.
Ledewitz, Bruce. 2007 American Religious Democracy: Coming to Terms with the End of Secular Politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Liow, Joseph, and Nadirsyah Hosen. 2010. Islam in Southeast Asia. 4 vols. London and New York: Routledge.
Maddox, Marion. 2005. God under Howard: The Rise of the Religious Right in Australian Politics. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Moten, Abdul Rashid. 2005. “Malaysia as an Islamic state: A Political Analysis.” In Institut Kefahaman Islam (ed.), Malaysia sebagai sebuah neg-ara Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia.
Mujani, Saiful, and R. William Liddle. 2004. “Politics, Islam and Public Opinion.” Journal of Democracy, 15 (1): 109–123.
Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Price, Daniel E. 1999. Islamic Political Culture, Democracy, and Human Rights. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Sadurski, Wojciech. 1989. “On Legal Definitions of “Religion.” The Australian Law Journal, 63: 834–843.
Stahnke, Tad, and Robert C. Blitt. 2005. “The Religion-State Relationship and the Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Comparative Textual Analysis of the Constitutions of Predominantly Muslim Countries.” US Commission on International Religious Freedom. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=761746
Stepan, Alfred. 2001. Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tepe, Sultan. 2008. Beyond Sacred and Secular: Politics of Religion in Israel and Turkey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tobing, Robert Lumban. 1996. “Christian Social Ethics in the Thoughts of TB Simatupang: The Role of Indonesian Christian in Social Change.” PhD thesis, University of Denver.
Torfs, Rik. 2007. “Experiences of Western Democracies in Dealing with the Legal Position of Churches and Religious Communities.” Religious Studies Review, 1 (1): 67–73.
Williams, Rowan. 2008. “Shari’a Law in UK Is “Unavoidable.” Available at http://news.bbc.co.Uk/l/hi/uk/7232661.stm.
Yang, Heriyanto. 2005. “The History and Legal Position of Confucianism in Post-Independence Indonesia.” Marburg Journal of Religion 10 (1): 1–8.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Lily Zubaidah Rahim
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hosen, N. (2013). Religious Pluralism, Inclusive Secularism, and Democratic Constitutionalism. In: Rahim, L.Z. (eds) Muslim Secular Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282057_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282057_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44846-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28205-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)