As we have seen, the traditional claim that individuals have consented to the state cannot plausibly be defended. Hypothetical social contract theorists turn instead to the claim that individuals would consent to the state under certain hypothetical conditions.1 These conditions may involve stipulations regarding the knowledge, degree of rationality, and motivations of the parties to the social contract, in addition to the stipulation that all members of a society be given a choice as to what sort of society they shall live in. The fact that we would have agreed to a given arrangement in a particular hypothetical scenario is thought to legitimize that arrangement and generate obligations to support it. This approach has the dialectical advantage of avoiding the sort of dependence on empirical facts about the actual world that proved the downfall of the traditional social contract theory.
- Moral Reasoning
- Original Position
- Social Contract
- Distributive Justice
- Political Authority
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
© 2013 Michael Huemer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huemer, M. (2013). The Hypothetical Social Contract Theory. In: The Problem of Political Authority. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137281661_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-28165-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28166-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)