Skip to main content

Analysing YouTube Audience Reactions and Discussions: A Network Approach

  • Chapter

Abstract

The video-sharing site YouTube is one of the most popular websites in the world according to the search tool Alexa.com. It is a social phenomenon, allowing individuals to create and share media content with millions of other users worldwide. It also serves as an important new information source for a myriad of mainstream and specialised interests, housing as it does a vast array of videos on various topics. In addition to its visual component, YouTube also facilitates discussion by allowing individuals to comment on the videos they have seen. This allows researchers to investigate audience reactions to the topics covered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexa. (2012) YouTube.com site info, available at: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/YouTube.com, date accessed 9 April 2012.

  • BBC News. (2011) ‘Croydon-to-Wimbledon Racist Tram Rant Accused in Court’, available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-15933829, date accessed 11 April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K.C. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueorguieva, V. (2008) ‘Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the 2006 Election Cycle and Beyond’, Social Science Computer Review, 26 (3), 288–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R. and Barab, S. (2002) ‘Searching for Safety Online: Managing “Trolling” in a Feminist Forum’, The Information Society: An International Journal, 18 (5), 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatib, L., Dutton, W. and Thelwall, M. (2012) ‘Public Diplomacy 2.0: An Exploratory Case Study of the US Digital Outreach Team’, Middle East Journal, 66 (3), 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. and Abdoli, M. (2012) ‘The Role of Online Videos in Research Communication: A Content Analysis of You Tube Videos Cited in Academic Publications’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (9), 1710–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzara, D.L. (2010) ‘YouTube Courtship: The Private ins and Public outs of Chris and Nickas’, in C. Pullen and M. Cooper (eds.), LGBT Identity and Online New Media (New York, NY: Routledge), pp. 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S.P., Heath, N.L., St Denis, J.M. and Noble, R. (2011) ‘The Scope of Nonsuicidal Self-injury on YouTube’, Pediatrics, 127 (3), e552–e557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M. (2011) ‘When Citizen Photojournalism sets the News Agenda: Neda Agha Soltan as a Web 2.0 Icon of Post-election Unrest in Iran’, Global Media and Communication, 7 (1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. (2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H. (2009) Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paek, H.J., Kim, K. and Hove, T. (2010) ‘Content Analysis of Antismoking Videos on YouTube: Message Sensation Value, Message Appeals, and their Relationships with Viewer Responses’, Health Education Research, 25 (6), 1085–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Internet (2012) ‘Who’s Online: Internet User Demographics’, available at: http://pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data/Whos-Online.aspx, date accessed 11 April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1983) Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Buckley, K. and Paltoglou, G. (2012) ‘Sentiment Strength Detection for the Social Web’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (1), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Sud, P. and Vis, F. (2012) ‘Commenting on YouTube videos: From Guatemalan Rock to El Big Bang’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (3), 616–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zoonen, L., Mihelj, S. and Vis, F. (2011) ‘YouTube Interactions Between Agonism, Antagonism and Dialogue: Video Responses to the Anti-Islam Film Fitna’, New Media and Society, 13 (8), 1283–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D. and Thelwall, M. (2011) ‘Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics’, Social Science Computer Review, 29 (4), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, J.H. and Kim, J. (2012) ‘Obesity in the New Media: A Content Analysis of Obesity Videos on YouTube’, Health Communication, 27 (1), 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Mike Thelwall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thelwall, M. (2014). Analysing YouTube Audience Reactions and Discussions: A Network Approach. In: Cantijoch, M., Gibson, R., Ward, S. (eds) Analyzing Social Media Data and Web Networks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276773_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics