Skip to main content

Environments for Shared Societies

  • Chapter
Public Policies in Shared Societies
  • 72 Accesses

Abstract

Food riots and climate wars may appear to have entered into the popular lexicon only recently, but conflicts over natural resources, ranging from questions about who controls their extraction to issues around equitable distribution and sustainable use, have long been central to our understanding of many of the problems in divided societies. As climate change has emerged, a newly relevant question is if the ways in which societies, both shared and divided, have arranged how to deal with their environments are likely to remain viable. Many societies will be forced to deal with rapid and unforeseen shifts related to climate. These shifts are expected to be profound and not limited to the availability, quantity and quality of water and air or the movements of flora and fauna. So even though environmental conflicts are not new, or restricted to divided societies, it is reasonable to expect that the frequency and intensity of these conflicts is not likely to be reduced in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brunner, R.D. (2005). Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy, and Decision Making. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castello, L. (2004). A method to count pirarucu Arapaima gigas: Fishers, assessment, and management. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 24(2), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello, L., Viana, J.P., Watkins, G., Pinedo-vasquez, M., and Luzadis, V.A. (2009). Lessons from Integrating Fishers of Arapaima in Small-Scale Fisheries Management at the Mamirauâ Reserve, Amazon. Environmental Management, 43(2), 197–209. doi:http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.mit.edu/10.1007/s00267–008-9220-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, R., Costanza, R., Van den Broeck, D., Aronson, J., Burkhard, B., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Haines-Young, R., et al. (2012). A global partnership for ecosystem services. The Solutions Journal, 2(6), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A., Wright, E. O. and Abers, R. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S. (2001).Panarchy: Understanding Transformations In Human and Natural Systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innés, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (2010). Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (ai]st ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, H.A., Susskind, L.E. and Wallace, K.H. (2007). A dialogue, not a diatribe: effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 49(1), 20–34. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.49.1.20-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, T.M. and Bodine, J. (2008). Implementing ecosystem management in public agencies: lessons from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service. Conservation Biology, 22(1), 60–69. doi: 10.Ill 1/j. 1523–1739.2007.00860.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. (1994). Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science And Politics For The Environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S.R., Alberti, M., Folke, C, Moran, E., Pell, A.N., et al. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–1516. doi: 10.1126/science. 1144004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ninan, K.N. (2009). Conserving and Valuing Ecosystem Sendees and Biodiversity: Economic, Institutional and Social Challenges. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Folke, C. and Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34(1), 75–90. doi: 10.1007/s00267–003-0101-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C, Kabat, P. and Möltgen, J. (2007). Adaptive and Integrated Water Management: Coping with Complexity and Uncertainty. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, T. (2007). Conflict Assessment: A Review of the State of Practice. Consensus Building Insitute. Retrieved from http://cbuilding.org/sites/cbi.drupalconnect. com/files/ConflictAssessmentSummary_Schenk.pdf.

  • Schwarze, S., Erasmani, S., Priess, J. and Zeller, M. (2009). Do National Parks reduce Deforestation? The effectiveness of the Lore-Lindu National Park in Indonesia. (Discussion Paper No. 30). STORMA Research Project on Satbility of rain Forest Margins. Gottingen: Georg-August University Gottingen. Retrieved from http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/serien/yo/STORMA/SDP30.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., McKearnan, S. and Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999). The Consensus Building Handbook: a Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Korff, Y, d’Aquino, P., Daniell, K. and Bijlsma, R. (2010). Designing participation processes for water management and beyond. Ecology and Society, 15(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6(1), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck, J.M. and Yaffee, S.L. (2000). Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Mattijs J. Van Maasakkers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Maasakkers, M.J. (2013). Environments for Shared Societies. In: Public Policies in Shared Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276322_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics