Abstract
Food riots and climate wars may appear to have entered into the popular lexicon only recently, but conflicts over natural resources, ranging from questions about who controls their extraction to issues around equitable distribution and sustainable use, have long been central to our understanding of many of the problems in divided societies. As climate change has emerged, a newly relevant question is if the ways in which societies, both shared and divided, have arranged how to deal with their environments are likely to remain viable. Many societies will be forced to deal with rapid and unforeseen shifts related to climate. These shifts are expected to be profound and not limited to the availability, quantity and quality of water and air or the movements of flora and fauna. So even though environmental conflicts are not new, or restricted to divided societies, it is reasonable to expect that the frequency and intensity of these conflicts is not likely to be reduced in the near future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brunner, R.D. (2005). Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy, and Decision Making. Columbia University Press.
Castello, L. (2004). A method to count pirarucu Arapaima gigas: Fishers, assessment, and management. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 24(2), 379–389.
Castello, L., Viana, J.P., Watkins, G., Pinedo-vasquez, M., and Luzadis, V.A. (2009). Lessons from Integrating Fishers of Arapaima in Small-Scale Fisheries Management at the Mamirauâ Reserve, Amazon. Environmental Management, 43(2), 197–209. doi:http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.mit.edu/10.1007/s00267–008-9220-5.
De Groot, R., Costanza, R., Van den Broeck, D., Aronson, J., Burkhard, B., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Haines-Young, R., et al. (2012). A global partnership for ecosystem services. The Solutions Journal, 2(6), 42–43.
Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Penguin.
Fung, A., Wright, E. O. and Abers, R. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.
Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S. (2001).Panarchy: Understanding Transformations In Human and Natural Systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Innés, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (2010). Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (ai]st ed.). London: Routledge.
Karl, H.A., Susskind, L.E. and Wallace, K.H. (2007). A dialogue, not a diatribe: effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 49(1), 20–34. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.49.1.20-34.
Koontz, T.M. and Bodine, J. (2008). Implementing ecosystem management in public agencies: lessons from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service. Conservation Biology, 22(1), 60–69. doi: 10.Ill 1/j. 1523–1739.2007.00860.x.
Lee, K. N. (1994). Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science And Politics For The Environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S.R., Alberti, M., Folke, C, Moran, E., Pell, A.N., et al. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–1516. doi: 10.1126/science. 1144004.
Ninan, K.N. (2009). Conserving and Valuing Ecosystem Sendees and Biodiversity: Economic, Institutional and Social Challenges. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Olsson, P., Folke, C. and Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34(1), 75–90. doi: 10.1007/s00267–003-0101-7.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pahl-Wostl, C, Kabat, P. and Möltgen, J. (2007). Adaptive and Integrated Water Management: Coping with Complexity and Uncertainty. New York: Springer.
Schenk, T. (2007). Conflict Assessment: A Review of the State of Practice. Consensus Building Insitute. Retrieved from http://cbuilding.org/sites/cbi.drupalconnect. com/files/ConflictAssessmentSummary_Schenk.pdf.
Schwarze, S., Erasmani, S., Priess, J. and Zeller, M. (2009). Do National Parks reduce Deforestation? The effectiveness of the Lore-Lindu National Park in Indonesia. (Discussion Paper No. 30). STORMA Research Project on Satbility of rain Forest Margins. Gottingen: Georg-August University Gottingen. Retrieved from http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/serien/yo/STORMA/SDP30.pdf.
Scott, J.C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Susskind, L., McKearnan, S. and Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999). The Consensus Building Handbook: a Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Von Korff, Y, d’Aquino, P., Daniell, K. and Bijlsma, R. (2010). Designing participation processes for water management and beyond. Ecology and Society, 15(3), 1.
Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6(1), 14.
Wondolleck, J.M. and Yaffee, S.L. (2000). Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Mattijs J. Van Maasakkers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Maasakkers, M.J. (2013). Environments for Shared Societies. In: Public Policies in Shared Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276322_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276322_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44661-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27632-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)