Skip to main content

An Interdisciplinary Textbook Project: Charting the Paths Taken

  • Chapter
Book cover English Language Teaching Textbooks

Summary

Advanced-level literacy textbooks, written for students who are transitioning from ‘general’ academic English to the English of their academic disciplines, are not often discipline-specific, nor are they written by teams of authors who bring in both language and disciplinary expertise. In this chapter, we showcase an interdisciplinary textbook development project that brought together professionals from two disparate fields: applied linguistics and chemistry: Specifically, we explain the complex and iterative process that led to the publication of Write like a Chemist, a textbook that assists university-level chemistry students (native and nonnative speakers of English) develop discipline-specific reading and writing skills. To explain why the textbook looks the way it does, we chart the various paths taken during the writing process. After providing background on the project and identifying the textbook’s defining characteristics, we highlight numerous (and intertwined) steps that led to its development and final publication. We comment on these steps sequentially, even though most occurred in a non-linear fashion, influencing and informing one another throughout the multi-year project. We depict the following steps in the textbook-development process: (i) articulating priorities and principles; (ii) scaffolding the instructional approach; (in) selecting target genres, compiling corpora with full-length text exemplars, and analyzing them using tools from corpus linguistics and discourse, genre, and move analyses; (iv) converting analytical findings into instructional materials; (v) piloting and assessing materials; and (vi) using feedback to improve materials. To describe the textbook publication process, we focus on steps taken to (i) find a publisher; (ii) secure copyright permissions; (in) select a title; (iv) acknowledge contributors; and (v) finalize copy. We conclude with suggestions for language professionals who wish to pursue interdisciplinary textbook endeavors in other content areas or with different skill emphases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alley, M. (1996). The craft of scientific writing (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beall, H. and Trimbur, J. (2001). A short guide to writing about chemistry (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T.N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., Connor, U., and Upton, TA. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coghill, A.M. and Garson, L.R. (Eds.). (2006). The ACS style guide: Effective communication of scientific information (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demko, Z.P. and Sharpless, K.B. (2001). Preparation of 5-substituted lH-tetrazoles from nitriles in water. Journal of Organic Chemistry, 66, 7945–7950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, P. (1998). Piloting — A publisher’s view. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 149–189). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley-Evans, T and St. John, M.J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feak, C.B. and Swales, J.M. (2010). Writing for publication: Corpus-informed materials for postdoctoral fellows in perinatology. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 279–300). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, J.W., Ip, C., Lisk, D.J., Davis, CD., Hintze, K.J., and Whanger, P.D. (2001). Cancer-protective properties of high-selenium broccoli. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, 2679–2683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frechtling Westat, J. (2002). The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation. Arlington: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N. (2010). Issues in materials development and design. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 3–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedin-Dahlström, J., Rosengren-Holmberg, J.P., Legrand, S., Wikman, S., and Nicholls, I.A. (2006). A class II aldolase mimic. Journal of Organic Chemistry, 71, 4845–4853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S.S., Soppelsa, B.F., and West, G.K. (1982). Teaching ESL students to read and write experimental-research papers. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, B., Stoller, F.L., and Robinson, M.S. (2008). Interdisciplinary collaboration: Two heads are better than one. English Teaching Forum, 42, 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (2003). Designing language teaching tasks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovac, J. and Sherwood, D.W. (2001). Writing across the chemistry curriculum: An instructor’s handbook. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A. (1998). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 190–216). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, M.F. (1997). Writing science through critical thinking. Sudbury: Jones and Barlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M.S., Stoller, F.L., Costanza-Robinson, M.S., and Jones, J.K. (2008). Write like a chemist: A guide and resource. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuda, V. (2005). Expertise in pedagogic task design. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 230–254). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, F.L., Horn, B., Grabe, W., and Robinson, M.S. (2005). Creating and validating assessment instruments for a discipline-specific writing course: An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 75–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, F.L., Horn, B., Grabe, W., and Robinson, M.S. (2006). Evaluative review in materials development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 174–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, F.L. and Robinson, M.S. (2013). Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes, 32, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J.M. and Feak, C.B. (2001). Reflections on collaborative practice in EAP materials production. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context: Implications and applications. Papers in honor of Tony Dudley-Evans (pp. 215–226). Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J.M. and Feak, C.B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardy, C.M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette: Parlor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2003). Materials evaluation. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 15–36). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, E.A. (2004). Can cross-disciplinary links help us teach ‘academic discourse’ in FYC? Across the Disciplines: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Language, Learning, and Academic Writing, 1. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu.

  • Wi, S. and Frydman, L. (2001). Heteronuclear recoupling in solid-state magic-angle-spinning NMR via overtone inadiation. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 123, 10354–10361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Fredricka L. Stoller, Marin S. Robinson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoller, F.L., Robinson, M.S. (2014). An Interdisciplinary Textbook Project: Charting the Paths Taken. In: Harwood, N. (eds) English Language Teaching Textbooks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276285_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics