Advertisement

Global Textbooks in Local Contexts: An Empirical Investigation of Effectiveness

  • Gregory Hadley

Summary

Global textbooks (GTs) — full-featured English language teaching materials containing a range of workbooks, videos, CD-ROMs, and online materials — have become a major feature of Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) pedagogy in the 21st century. However, they are much maligned by some scholars as tools of cultural imperialism that damage local cultures and contribute to the learners’ failure to acquire proficiency in English as a Foreign Language. This chapter uncovers a number of the sociopolitical dynamics that give rise to GT opposition, and questions some of the more strident claims of anti-GT scholars. The chapter then presents a six-year empirical study conducted at a university English language program in Japan, where nearly 700 students have used a GT as the core material. Drawing from both qualitative and statistical analyses, this chapter concludes that GTs have significant potential for becoming an effective resource for second language learning, but the greatest chance of pedagogical improvement seems most likely in language programs where major institutional stakeholders achieve an acceptable degree of political equilibrium.

Keywords

Language Teaching Classroom Management Language Teacher Placement Test English Language Teaching 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R (2000). The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allman, P. (2001). Revolutionary social transformation: Democratic hopes, political possibilities and critical education. Westport: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  3. Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amrani, R (2011). The process of evaluation: A publisher’s view. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in second language teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 267–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Apple, M. and Jungck, S. (1990). ‘You don’t have to be a teacher to teach this unit’: Teaching, technology, and gender in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ardener, S. (1997). Women and space: Ground rules and social maps. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  7. Arimoto, A. (2007). Thirty years in higher education research: A retrospective review and perspective. Higher Education Research in Japan, 4, 1–30.Google Scholar
  8. Aronowitz, S. (2000). The knowledge factory. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Asgari, A. (2011). The compatibility of cultural value in Iranian EFL textbooks. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2, 887–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baber, L. and Linsday, B. (2006). Analytical reflections on access in English higher education: Transnational lessons across the pond. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1, 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bax, S. (2003). The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal, 57, 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell, J. and Gower, R. (2011). Writing course materials for the world: A great compromise. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 135–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T (1967). The social construction of reality (3rd ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Block, D. (2002). ‘McCommunication’: A problem in the frame for SLA. In D. Block and D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 117–133). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems, 18, 298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bocock, J., Baston, L., Scott, P., and Smith, D. (2003). American influence on British higher education: Science, technology, and the problem of university expansion, 1945–1963. Minerva, 41, 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bolitho, R. and Tomlinson, B. (2005). Discover English: Language analysis for teachers. Oxford: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  18. Cambridge University Press Annual Report (2010). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cambridge University Press Annual Report and Accounts (2011). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cambridge University Press Performance Study (2010). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Canagarajah, A. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 601–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Canagarajah, A. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Castree, N. and Sparke, M. (2000). Professional geography and the corporatization of the university: Experiences, evaluations, and engagements. Antipode, 32, 222–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Charmaz, K. (2001). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. Gubrium and J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 675–696). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crewe, J. (2011). How far do ‘global’ ELT coursebooks realize key principles of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and enable effective teaching-learning? Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  29. Deem, R. (1998). ‘New Managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Donoghue, R (2008). The last professors: The corporate university and the fate of the humanities. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dunkley, D. (1997). A guide to British master’s degrees in TESOL by distance learning. The Language Teacher, 21, 7–12.Google Scholar
  33. Dunkley, D. (2007). 21st century distance learning in TESOL. Foreign Languages and Literature of Aichi Gakuin University Center of Linguistic Research, 32, 103–115.Google Scholar
  34. Dunlap, W., Cortina, J., Vaslow, J., and Burke, M. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ekkens, K. and Winke, P. (2009). Evaluating workplace English language programs. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6, 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ellis, R. (2011). Macro-and micro-evaluations of task-based teaching. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 212–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Feyten, C. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 75, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fox, C. (2002). The massification of higher education. In D. Hayes and R. Wynyard (Eds.), The McDonaldization of higher education (pp. 129–142). London: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  40. Frank, M. (2005). The Shibata project: A Freirean approach to community-based research in the EFL classroom. Keiwa College Research Journal, 14, 275–287.Google Scholar
  41. Friedrich, P. (1988). Multiplicity and pluralism in anthropological construction/synthesis. Anthropological Quarterly, 61, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Friedrich, P. (1989). Language, ideology, and political economy. American Anthropologist, 91, 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gabrielatos, C. (2004). Session plan: The coursebook as a flexible tool. IATEFL Teacher Trainers and Educators SIG Newsletter, 1, 26–31.Google Scholar
  44. Giroux, H. (2004). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. In A. Canestrari and B. Marlowe (Eds.), Educational foundations: An anthology of critical readings (pp. 205–214). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  46. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  47. Goodman, R. (2012). Shifting landscapes: The social context of youth problems in an ageing nation. In R. Goodman, Y. Imoto, and T. Toivonen (Eds.), A sociology of Japanese youth: From returnees to NEETs (pp. 159–173). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Gray, J. (2002). The global coursebook in English Language Teaching. In D. Block and D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 151–167). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Gray J. (2010). The branding of English and the culture of the new capitalism: Representations of the world of work in English Language textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 31, 714–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Guri-Rosenblit, S., Sebkova, H., and Teichler, U. (2007). Massification and diversity of higher education systems: Interplay of complex dimensions. Higher Education Policy, 20, 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hadley, G. (1997). A survey of cultural influences in Japanese ELT Bulletin of Keiwa College, 6, 61–Google Scholar
  52. Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English: An introduction to the practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  53. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  54. Harwood, N. (2005). What do we want EAP teaching materials for? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Harwood, N. (2010). English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hawkey, R. (2006). Teacher and learner perceptions of language learning activity. ELT Journal, 60, 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hino, N. (1988). Nationalism and English as an international language: The history of English textbooks in Japan. World Englishes, 7, 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hirai, M. (2002). Correlations between active skill and passive skill test scores. Shiken: [ALT Testing and Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 6, 2–8.Google Scholar
  59. Hubball, H. and Gold, N. (2007). The scholarship of curriculum practice and undergraduate program reform: Integrating theory into practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 112, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Irie, K. (2003). What do we know about the language learning motivation of university students in Japan? Some patterns in survey studies. JALT Journal, 25, 86–100.Google Scholar
  61. Itoh, A. (2002). Higher education reform in perspective: The Japanese experience. Higher Education, 43, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jarvis, P. (2001). Universities and corporate universities: The higher learning industry in global society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Kachru, B. (1982). The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  64. Kariya, T and Rosenbaum, J. (2003). Stratified incentives and life course behaviors. In J. Mortimer and M. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 51–78). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kim, J. and Craig, D. (2012). Validation of a videoconferenced speaking test. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25, 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kinnell, M. (1989). International marketing in UK higher education: Some issues in relation to marketing educational programmes to overseas students. European Journal of Marketing, 23, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kitagawa, R and Oba, J. (2010). Managing differentiation of higher education system in Japan: Connecting excellence and diversity. Higher Education, 59, 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kramsch, C. and Sullivan, P. (1996). Appropriate pedagogy. ELT Journal, 50, 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kubota, R. (1998). Ideologies of English in Japan. World Englishes, 17, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kwiek, M. (2001). Globalization and higher education. Higher Education in Europe, 26, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Lesley, T., Hansen, C., and Zukowski/Faust, J. (2005). Interchange third edition passages placement and evaluation package. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Liao, C.W., Qu, Y.X., and Morgan, R. (2010). The relationships of test scores measured by the TOEIC®listening and reading test and TOEIC®speaking and writing tests. In TOEIC Compendium 10, 13, 1–15.Google Scholar
  74. Lincicome, M. (1999). Nationalism, imperialism, and the international education movement in early twentieth-century Japan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 58, 338–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Little John, A. (2011). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 179–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Litz, D. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. Asian EFL Journal, 48, 1–53.Google Scholar
  77. Low, G. (1989). Appropriate design: The internal organisation of course units. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 136–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Masuhara, H. (2011). What do teachers really want from coursebooks? In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 236–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Masuhara, H. and Tomlinson, B. (2008). Materials for general English. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), English language learning materials: A critical review (pp. 17–37). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  80. Mauk, D. and Oakland, J. (2002). American civilization: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. McCullough, B. and Heiser, D. (2008). On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2007. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52, 4570–4578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McDonough, J. and Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide. Maiden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  83. McKay, S. (2003). Teaching English as an international language: The Chilean context. ELT Journal, 57, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. McKenzie, K. and Scheurich, J. (2004). The corporatization and privatization of schooling: A call for grounded critical praxis. Educational Theory, 54, 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Meddings, L. and Thombury, S. (2011). Teaching unplugged: Dogme in English language teaching. Peaslake and New Delhi: Delta ELT Publishing and Viva Books.Google Scholar
  86. Meiron, B. and Schick, L. (2000). Ratings, raters and test performance: An exploratory study. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Fairness and validation in language assessment (Vol. 9: Selected papers from the 19th language testing research colloquium, Orlando, Florida) (pp. 153–176). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Modiano, M. (2001). Linguistic imperialism, cultural integrity, and EIL. ELT Journal, 55, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mori, R. (2002). Entrance examinations and remedial education in Japanese higher education. Higher Education, 43, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  90. O’Donnell, K. (2003). Uncovering first year students’ language learning experiences, their attitudes, and motivations in a context of change at the tertiary level of education. JALT Journal, 25, 31–62.Google Scholar
  91. Oxford Annual Report of the Delegates of the University Press (2010/2011). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Peacock, M. (1998). Exploring the gap between teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about ‘useful’ activities for EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Phillipson, R. (1993). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Phillipson, R. (2001). English for globalisation or for the world’s people? International Review of Education, 47, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Power, S. and Whitty, G. (1999). Market forces and school cultures. In j. Prosser (Ed.), School culture (pp. 15–29). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Relaxed Rules Led to Too Many Universities. (2013). The Yomiuri Shimbun Online (4 November). Retrieved from http://www.yomiuri.co.jp
  98. Richards, J. (1993). Beyond the text book: The role of commercial materials in language teaching. RELC Journal, 24, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Richards, J., Hull, J., and Proctor, S. (1997). New interchange series levels 1, 2 and 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Richards, J., Hull, J., Proctor, S., Cory-Wright, K., Dorado, E., and Pianco, S. (2005). Interchange 3rd edition teachers resource book levels 1, 2, and 3. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Richards, J., Hull, J., Proctor, S., and Shields, C. (2005). Interchange third edition: Full contact. Student’s book 1, 2 and 3. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Riley, P. (2006). The beliefs of first year Japanese university students towards the learning of English. Unpublished Doctor of Education (EdD) Thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Southern Queensland.Google Scholar
  103. Rowland, L. and Bans, K. (2013). Working with textbooks: Reconceptualising student and teacher roles in the classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Saslow, J. and Ascher, A. (2006). Top notch. Harlow: Pearson ELT.Google Scholar
  105. Shannon, P. (1987). Commercial reading materials, a technological ideology, and the deskilling of teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 87, 307–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Silvey, R. (2002). Sweatshops and the corporatization of the university. Gender, Place and Culture, 9, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Smeby, J. (2003). The impact of massification on university research. Tertiary Education and Management, 9, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Smiley, J. and Masui, M. (2008). Materials in Japan: Coexisting traditions. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), English language learning materials: A critical review (pp. 245–262). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  110. Soars, J. and Soars, L. (2000). New headway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Spector, M. and Kitsuse, J. (2006). Constructing social problems. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  112. Stanley, E. and Patrick, W. (1998). Quality assurance in American and British higher education: A comparison. New Directions for Institutional Research, 99, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Steck, H. (2003). Corporatization of the university: Seeking conceptual clarity. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 585, 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Suzuki, T (2000). Nihonjin wa naze Eigo ga dekinai ka (Why Can’t Japanese Master English?). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
  115. Teichler, U. (1998). Massification: A challenge for institutions of higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 4, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Tjeldvoll, A. (1996). Recent developments in Scandinavian higher education. International Higher Education, 6, 13–14.Google Scholar
  117. Toivonen, T and Imoto, Y. (2012). Making sense of youth problems. In R. Goodman, Y. Imoto, and T Toivonen (Eds.), A sociology of Japanese youth: From returnees to NEETs (pp. 1–29). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  118. Tollefson, J. (1981). The role of language planning in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 31, 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Tomlinson, B. (2008). English language learning materials: A critical review. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  120. Tomlinson, B. (2011). Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Tryhorn, C. (2011). English language turns into big business asset. The Sunday Times, 1 May, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk
  122. Tuchman, G. (2009). Wannabe u: Inside the corporate university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Tudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  124. Turner, J., Laurens, S., Stevens, R., and Titterington, T. (1997). New interchange/passages English for international communication placement test. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  125. Ur, P. (2000). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  126. Wagi’alla, A. (1996). English in Sudan. In j. Fishman, A. Conrad, and A. Rubal-Lopez (Eds.), Post-Imperial English: Status change in former British and American colonies, 1940–1990 (pp. 339–356). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  127. Wall, D., Clapham, C., and Alderson, J. (1994). Evaluating a placement test. Language Testing, 11, 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wallace, C. (2002). Local literacies and global literacy. In D. Block and D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 101–114). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  129. Wang, W.C., Lin, C.H., and Lee, C.C. (2011). Thinking of the textbook in the ESL/EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 4, 91–96.Google Scholar
  130. Wang, Y.H. and Wang, C.N. (2010). Exploring EFL Taiwanese university students’ perceptions of a collaborative CALL environment. In J.-S. Pan, S.-M. Chen, and N.-T Nguyen (Eds.), Computational collective intelligence. Technologies and applications (pp. 421–432). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Warner, C. and Meehan, A. (2001). Microsoft Excel(tm) as a tool for teaching basic statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 295–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Warrington, S. (2006). The time in between: Socialization training as a learning priority for Japanese university students. Asian EFL Journal, 12, 1–14.Google Scholar
  133. Washburn, J. (2005). University, inc.: The corporate corruption of American higher education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  134. Waters, A. (2009). Ideology in applied linguistics for language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 30, 138–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Welle-Strand, A. (2000). Knowledge production, service and quality: Higher education tensions in Norway. Quality in Higher Education, 6, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wette, R. and Barkhuizen, G. (2009). Teaching the book and educating the person: Challenges for university English language teachers in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. White, R., Martin, M., Stimson, M., and Hodge, R. (1995). Management in English language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Williamson, K. (2006). Research in constractivist frameworks using ethnographic techniques. Library Trends, 55, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wong, P.W.L. (2011). Textbook evaluation: A framework for evaluating the fitness of the Hong Kong New Secondary School (NSS) curriculum. Unpublished MA dissertation, Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  141. Woodward, T (2001). Planning lessons and courses: Designing sequences of work for the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Woolgar, L. (2007). New institutional policies for university-industry links in Japan. Research Policy, 36, 1261–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Yakhontova, T (2001). Textbooks, contexts, and learners. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Yamamoto, K. (2004). Corporatization of national universities in Japan: Revolution for governance or rhetoric for downsizing? Financial Accountability and Management, 20, 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Yonezawa, A. (2002). The quality assurance system and market forces in Japanese higher education. Higher Education, 43, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Zarei, G.R. and Khalessi, M. (2011). Cultural load in English language textbooks: An analysis of Interchange series. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gregory Hadley 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Hadley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations