Skip to main content

Abstract

While the preceding chapter examined the importance of listening for Beckett’s figures, here the focus is on the speech act itself and the orifice that enables it. This chapter will be attuned to the limit and tension between inner and outer as imaged in the tacky, productive orifice of the mouth. Sticky, tacky contortions of this organ produce speech and speech attempts to make sense of the self, of the body, of the surrounding material world. The organs of speech are paramount in Not I : the lips, the teeth, the vibrating folds of the throat, saliva, tongue, and all the contortions, as the mouth of that play puts it, without which no speech would be possible ( CSP, 219). The hollow internal spaces of Nancy’s resonant subject 1 are realized by the opening of the mouth, which “can resume and revive resonance.”2 The organs of speech—lips, teeth, tongue, and vocal folds—are tacky: red, wet, erotic, in contrast to the invisible and impalpable sonorous vibrations it produces. These vibrations, as Adriana Cavarero puts it, are “as colourless as the air, com[ing] out of a wet mouth and aris[ing] from the red of the flesh.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jean-Luc Nancy, Listening, trans. Charlotte Mandell (New York: Fordham University Press, 2007 ), 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adriana Cavarero, For More than One Voice: Toward a Philosophy of Vocal Expression, trans. Paul A. Kottman (CA: Stanford University Press, 2001 ), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roland Barthes (in collaboration with Roland Havas), “Ascolto,” in Enciclopedia Einaudi (Turin: Einaudi, 1977), 1: 237. Quoted in ibid., 15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smyth (London: Routledge, 2002 ), 181.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anna McMullan, Performing Embodiment in Samuel Beckett’s Drama ( New York: Routledge, 2010 ), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  6. MaryBryden, Women in Beckett’s Prose and Drama: Her Own Other ( Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993 ), 124.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kathy Smith suggests, with reference to Elaine Scarry’s work on the body under torture, that Not I demonstrates the transformation of body into voice, which is also a translation by power, in the torture chamber, of language into a scream and confession (“The Body in Pain: Beckett, Orlan and the Politics of Performance,” Studies in Theater and Performance 25 [ 2005 ]: 42). See also Elaine Scarry, The Body in Pain (NY, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985 ), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Alphonso Lingus (Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1969 ), 138.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon Armstrong, Samuel Beckett, W.B. Yeats, and Jack Yeats: Images and Words ( Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1990 ), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Judith Butler, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex ( New York and London: Routledge, 1993 ), 69.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ulrika Maude, “A Stirring beyond Coming and Going: Beckett and Tourette’s,” Journal of Beckett Studies 17 (2008), 162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. David Eagleman, Incognito: The Secret Life of the Brain ( UK: Canongate, 2012 ), 163.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howard Kushner and Kate Brown, “Eruptive Voices: Coprolalia, Malediction, and the Poetics of Cursing,” New Literary History 35 (2001): 543.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mladen Dolar, “The Object Voice,” in Gaze and Voice as Love Objects, ed. Renata Salecl and Slovoj Žiž ek (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1996 ), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kathleen O’Gorman, “‘but this other awful thought’: Aspects of the Female in Beckett’s Not I,” Journal of Beckett Studies 1 (1992): 36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elizabeth Grosz, Volatile Bodies ( Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994 ), 203.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marina Warner, “Who Can Shave an Egg?: Foreign Tongues and Primal Sounds in Mallarmé and Beckett,” in Reflections on Beckett: A Centenary Celebration, ed. Anna McMullan and S. E. Wilmer ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2009 ), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot (London: Faber, 1965 ), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johanna Oksala, “Female Freedom: Can the Lived Body be Emancipated?” Feminist Interpretations of Merleau-Ponty, ed. Dorothea Olkowski and Gail Weiss ( Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006 ), 224.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hanna Scolnicov, Women’s Theatrical Space ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994 ), 149.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elin Diamond, Unmaking Mimesis: Essays on Feminism and Theater (USA and UK: Routledge, 1997), iii.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Alois Riegl, Late Roman Art Industry, trans. Rolf Winkes (Rome: G. Bretschneider, 1985 ), 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Laura Marks, The Skin of the Film ( Durham: Duke University Press, 2000 ), 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anna McMullan, Theatre on Trial: Samuel Beckett’s Later Drama ( London: Routledge, 1993 ), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jacques Aumont, The Image, trans. Claire Pajackowska (London: British Film Institute, 1997 ), 189.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jose Ortegay Gasset, “Meditations on the Frame,” Perspecta 26 (1990): 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mariko Hori Tanaka, “Elements of Haiku in Beckett and Eisenstein,” SBTA 11 (2000): 325–326.

    Google Scholar 

  28. James A. W. Heffernan, Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbury ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993 ), 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Murray Krieger, Ekphrasis: The Illusion of the Natural Sign ( Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992 ), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. John Keats, Selected Poems ( UK: Penguin Classics, 2007 ), 191.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stephen Cheeke, Writing for Art: The Aesthetics of Ekphrasis ( Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2008 ), 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lois Oppenheim, ed., The Painted Word ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000 ), 142.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Walter Asmus, “Practical Aspects of Theater, Radio and Television: Rehearsal Notes for the German Premiere of Beckett’s ‘That Time’ and ‘Footfalls’ at the Schiller-Theater Werkstatt, Berlin (Directed by Beckett),” trans. Helen Wantabe, Journal of Beckett Studies 2 (1977): 94.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Samuel Beckett, Endgame (London: Faber & Faber, 1982 [1958]), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jean-Luc Nancy, Corpus, trans. Richard A. Rand ( New York: Fordham University Press, 2008 ), 17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Trish McTighe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McTighe, T. (2013). Mouth: Trying to Tell It All, Failing. In: The Haptic Aesthetic in Samuel Beckett’s Drama. New Interpretations of Beckett in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275332_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics