C. Barnett, Britain and her Army, 1509–1970: A Military, Political and Social Survey (London, 1970) p. 257; Bond, War and Society in Europe, p. 32; Friedberg, The Weary Titan, pp. 221–2.
Google Scholar
G. F. Shee, The Briton’s First Duty: The Case for Conscription (London, 1901), p. 175.
Google Scholar
T. W. L. Newton, Retrospection (London, 1941), pp. 115–6.
Google Scholar
C. P. Trevelyan, Democracy and Compulsory Service (London, 1913).
Google Scholar
J. A. Farrer, Liberalism and the National Service League (London, 1911), pp. 7–19, 50–1, 93–4.
Google Scholar
J. B. Glasier, The Peril of Conscription (London, 1915), p. 4.
Google Scholar
D. Hayes, Conscription Conflict: The Conflict of Ideas in the Struggle for and against Military Conscription in Britain between the years 1901 and 1939 (London, 1949), p. 39.
Google Scholar
R. J. Q. Adams and P. P. Poirier, The Conscription Controversy in Great Britain, 1900–18 (Ohio, 1987), pp. 11, 17, 21.
Google Scholar
G. Q. Flynn, Conscription and Democracy: The Draft in France, Great Britain and the United States (London, 2002), pp. 14.
Google Scholar
Even after the formation of the National Service League (NSL), many of these tracts were of a highly individualistic and independent-minded nature, and frequently advanced schemes for conscription which differed from the official programme of the League. See, for example, Maj. S. L. Murray, The Electors of Great Britain and the Defence of the Country (1900), and The Future Peace of the Anglo-Saxons (1905);
Google Scholar
Lt.-Col. T. Innes, The Second Line: A Letter Addressed to Commanding Officers of Militia (1905);
Google Scholar
Maj. J. H. Sandham Griffith, Britain Requires Every Man to do his Duty (1905);
Google Scholar
Capt. D. I. Macaulay, An Imperial Military System (1909);
Google Scholar
Col. Lonsdale Hale, The Horrors of War in Great Britain (1910); ‘Fidelis’, England’s Peril (1911);
Google Scholar
Capt. A. F. U. Green, The Shadow of the Sword (1914).
Google Scholar
R. B. Haldane, Before the War (London, 1920), p. 175.
Google Scholar
H. Strachan, ‘The British Army, its General Staff and the Continental Commitment, 1904–14’, in French and Reid (eds), The British General Staff: Reform and Innovation, pp. 84, 92; N. d’Ombrain, War Machinery and High Policy: Defence Administration in Peacetime Britain, 1902–1914 (Oxford, 1973), pp. 147–8.
Google Scholar
Minutes of evidence taken before the Royal Commission on the Militia and Volunteers, Cd. 2062–3, i, p. 88; Hansard, 1913, lii, 2027; R. Holmes, The Little Field Marshal: Sir John French (London, 1981), pp. 131, 144; I. F. W. Beckett, ‘Selection by Disparagement: Lord Esher, the General Staff and the Politics of Command, 1904–14’, in French and Reid (eds) The British General Staff: Reform and Innovation, p. 50.
Google Scholar
D. Cooper, Haig (2 vols, London, 1936), i, pp. 116–17;
Google Scholar
J. Marshall-Cornwall, Haig as Military Commander (London, 1973), p. 76;
Google Scholar
E. K. G. Sixsmith, Douglas Haig (London, 1976), p. 55; Strachan, Politics of the British Army, pp. 110–11.
Google Scholar
I. S. M. Hamilton, Compulsory Service: A Study of the Question in the Light of Experience (London, 1910), pp. 121–4, 147.
Google Scholar
These men were Tennant, J. D. Rees, H. F. B. Lynch, and H. G. Beaumont. Hansard, 1908, cxci, 1482–6.
Google Scholar
M. Pugh, Speak for Britain! A New History of the Labour Party (London, 2010), pp. 18–30; Ward, Red Flag and Union Jack, pp. 23–9, 60–2, 106–13.
Google Scholar
G. G. Coulton, True Liberalism and Compulsory Service (London, 1914), pp. 12, 17.
Google Scholar
Nation in Arms, July 1911, p. 344; Christmas 1913, p. 463; G. G. Coulton, A Strong Army in a Free State: A Study of the Old English and Modern Swiss Militias (London, 1900), pp. 19–41.
Google Scholar
F. Madden and D. Fieldhouse (eds), Settler Self-government, 1840–1900; The Development of Representative and Responsible Government. Select Documents on the Constitutional History of the British Empire and Commonwealth (London, 1990), p. 76.
Google Scholar
J. E. B. Seely, Adventure (London, 1930), pp. 92–93.
Google Scholar
House of Lords Record Office (HLRO), Lloyd George papers, G/46/3/81; For a chronology of the events surrounding the conference and the proposal for a coalition, see J. Grigg, Lloyd George: The People’s Champion, 1902–11, 2nd edn. (London, 1991), pp. 243–76.
Google Scholar
Grigg’s reproduction of the August memorandum in his appendix is, however, incomplete. The full text both of this document, and of the ‘Supplementary Memorandum’ of 29 October can be found in R. J. Scally, The Origins of the Lloyd George Coalition: The Politics of Social-Imperialism, 1900–1918 (Princeton, 1975), pp. 375–86.
Google Scholar
D. Lloyd George, War Memoirs of David Lloyd George, New edn (2 vols, London, 1938) i, pp. 21–2.
Google Scholar
B. B. Gilbert, Lloyd George: A Political Life (2 vols, London, 1987), i, pp. 412–21.
Google Scholar
J. Turner, British Politics and the Great War: Coalition and Conflict, 1915–1918 (London, 1992), p. 50.
Google Scholar
A. Chamberlain, Politics from Inside: An Epistolary Chronicle (London, 1936), p. 359.
Google Scholar
G. A. Riddell, More Pages from my Diary, 1908–1914 (London, 1934), p. 94;
Google Scholar
K. O. Morgan. Riddell, More Pages from my Diary, 1908–1914 (London, 1934), p. 94;
Google Scholar
K. O. Morgan, ‘Lloyd George and Germany’, Historical Journal, vol. 39, no. 3 (1996), pp. 755–66.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
E. David (ed.), Inside Asquith’s Cabinet: From the Diaries of Charles Hobhouse (London, 1977), p. 134. A private member’s bill proposing compulsory Territorial training had been introduced into the Commons on 11 April, but was talked out without a division being called. Among the bill’s sponsors was Sir Charles Rose, the Liberal MP for Newmarket. See Hansard, 5th Series, 1913, li., 1546–7.
Google Scholar
J. Morley, The Struggle for National Education (London, 1873), p. 139.
Google Scholar
L. T. Hobhouse, Liberalism (London, 1911), p. 147.
Google Scholar
J. S. Mill, On liberty (London, 1859), p. 24.
Google Scholar
F. S. Roberts, Fallacies and Facts: An Answer to ‘Compulsory Service’ (London, 1911), pp. 197–9. Cramb’s contribution to this work was prepared anonymously. See Allison, The National Service Issue, p. 180.
Google Scholar
H. Strachan, ‘Liberalism and Conscription, 1789–1919’, in H. Strachan, ed., The British Army, Manpower and Society into the Twenty-first Century (London, 2000), p. 5.
Google Scholar
T. C. Horsfall, National Service and the Welfare of the Community (London, 1906), p. 39.
Google Scholar
L. Dickey, ‘Power, Commerce, and Natural Law in Daniel Defoe’s Political Writings, 1698–1707’, in J. Robertson (ed.) A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the British Union of 1707 (Cambridge, 1995), p. 71.
Google Scholar
See J. Robertson, The Scottish Enlightenment and the Militia Issue (Edinburgh, 1985).
Google Scholar
J. Cartwright, The English Constitution Produced and Illustrated (London, 1823), pp. 85–6, 222.
Google Scholar
F. P. F. Vane, Agin the Governments: Memoirs and Adventures of Sir Francis Fletcher Vane (London, 1929), pp. 37–8.
Google Scholar
J. Joll, The Second International, 1889–1914, rev. ed. (London, 1974), pp. 112–4.
Google Scholar
G. Johnson, Social Democratic Politics in Britain, 1881–1911 (New York, 2002), pp. 127–30.
Google Scholar
H. Quelch, ‘Socialism and Soldiering’, Social Democrat, vol. XI, no. 10 (October, 1907), pp. 584–5.
Google Scholar
M. Hendley, ‘“Help us to Secure a Strong, Healthy, Prosperous and Peaceful Britain”: The Social Arguments for Compulsory Service in Britain, 1899–1914’, Canadian Journal of History, vol. 30, no. 2 (1995), pp. 261–88, at p. 287.
Google Scholar
H. Quelch, ‘Socialism, Militarism, and Mr Haldane’s Scheme’, Social Democrat, vol. XI, no. 4 (April, 1907), p. 207.
Google Scholar
K. Morgan, ‘British Guild Socialists and the Exemplar of the Panama Canal’, History of Political Thought, vol. 28, no. 1 (2007), pp. 120–57, at p. 140.
Google Scholar
R. McKibbin, ‘Social Classes and Social Observation in Edwardian England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, vol. 28 (1978), pp. 175–99;
CrossRef
Google Scholar
J. Harris, ‘The Transition to High Politics in English Social Policy, 1880–1914’, in M. Bentley and J. Stevenson (eds), High and Low Politics in Modern Britain: Ten Studies (Oxford, 1983), pp. 58–79;
Google Scholar
K. Bales, ‘Charles Booth’s Survey of Life and Labour of the People of London 1889–1903’, in M. Bulmer, K. Bales, and K. H. Sklar (eds), The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880–1940 (Cambridge, 1991), pp. 66–110.
Google Scholar
T. C. Horsfall, The Influence on National Life of Military Training in Schools (London, 1906), p. 7. See also Horsfall’s address to the Medical Officers of Schools Association in February 1906, published in The Influence on National Life of Military Training in Schools. As Treasurer of the Macclesfield and District Patriotic Association, Horsfall was active in a body which was involved in the drilling of some 3000 children; See Times, 31 October 1902.
Google Scholar
E. George, National Service and National Education (London, 1913), pp. 23–39.
Google Scholar
See M. Freeden, ‘Eugenics and Progressive Thought: A Study in Ideological Affinity’, Historical Journal, vol. 22, no. 3 (Sept., 1979), pp. 645–71.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
H. Elliot (ed.), The Letters of John Stuart Mill (2 vols, London, 1910), ii, p. 291. Part of this letter was quoted by the League in the Nation in Arms, September 1911, p. 464.
Google Scholar
H. Quelch, ‘Socialism, Militarism, and Mr Haldane’s Scheme’, Social Democrat, vol. XI, no. 4 (April, 1907), p. 204.
Google Scholar
M. V. Brett (ed.), Journals and Letters of Reginald Viscount Esher (4 vols, London, 1934–38), ii, p. 391.
Google Scholar
P. J. Waller, Writers, Readers, and Reputations: Literary Life in Britain, 1870–1918 (Oxford, 2006), pp. 896–8. Meredith joined the NSL in 1903. Following his death in May 1909, the Nation in Arms paid tribute to ‘this fearless, forthright Liberal of the old school’, and lamented the loss of ‘the most brilliant and far-sighted supporter of the principles for the establishment of which the League was founded’. Among the wreaths laid on the poet’s tomb was one from the NSL, dedicated ‘to one of its earliest and most distinguished supporters’. Nation in Arms, June 1909, p. 221.
Google Scholar