Skip to main content

The (D)evolution of a Norm: R2P, the Bosnia Generation and Humanitarian Intervention in Libya

  • Chapter
Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention

Abstract

The March 2011 NATO intervention in Libya has been widely touted as evidence of a new international norm that has come about as a result of advocacy of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle (Ban 2011; Gerber, 2011; Adams, 2011). Likewise, the Libya intervention has been characterized as an ‘unprecedented moment’ that is indicative of a new commitment and consensus by states that they have an obligation — indeed, a responsibility — to protect people who are being grossly abused by their own government (Williams 2011: 249). In contrast to the position that the Libya intervention is somehow groundbreaking or indicates the emergence of a new norm of humanitarian intervention that has been empowered by R2P advocacy, we argue that what enabled the Libya intervention is essentially an international normative environment that was brought about by precedents set during humanitarian interventions in the 1990s, while its proximate causes were the unique political and empirical circumstances that surrounded the Libya crisis. What supplemented this similarity in normative environments and confluence of political factors was a generation of policy analysts, advocates and practitioners who used the failures of the 1990s as a set of formative experiences that provided shortcut comparisons to springboard the Libya intervention.

The authors would like to thank Helen Kerwin for her extremely helpful research and editorial assistance for this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acuff, J. M. (2011) ‘The Next Generation of Terror: Generational Analysis and the Strategy And Tactics of al Qaeda’, paper presented at the 2011 International Studies Association annual meeting, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acuff, J. M. (2012) ‘Generational Analysis and the Evolution of Military Doctrine and Strategy’, in B. J. Steele and J. M. Acuff(eds), Theory and Application of the ‘Generation’ in International Relations and Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, S. (2011) ‘R2P and the Libya Mission’, Los Angeles Times, 28 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avlon, J. (2011) ‘Libya Airstrikes: the Women who Called for War’, The Daily Beast, 20 March. Available online at: www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/03/20/libya-airstrikes-hillary-clinton-and-the-women-who-called-for-war.html

  • Ban Ki-Moon (2011d) ‘Statement by the Secretary-General on Libya’, 17 March. Available online at: www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/crises/190-crisis-in-libya/3269-ban-says-historic-resolution-was-clearly-the-international-community-fulfilling-of-its-responsibility-to-protect

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, A. L. (2006) ‘The Responsibility to Protect: The UN World Summit and the Question of Unilateralism’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 143–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, Z. (2012) ‘Syria’s Crisis and the Future of R2P’, Foreign Policy, 16 March, available online at: http://mideast.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/03/16/syrias_crisis_and_the_future_of_r2p

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, P. (2004) ‘US “Hyping” Darfur Genocide Fear’, The Observer, 3 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. and E. Beck-Gernsheim (2009) ‘Global Generations and the Trap of Methodological Nationalism: for a Cosmopolitan Turn in the Sociology of Youth and Generation’, European Sociological Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beinart, P. (2011) ‘Behind the Libya War’, The Daily Beast, 20 March. Available online at: www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/03/21/libya-war-and-the-bosnia-hawks-on-the-obama-team-leading-the-charge.print.html

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2004) ‘Ethics and Intervention: The “Humanitarian Exception” and the Problem of Abuse in the Case of Iraq’, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 131–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2005) ‘Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse? The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq’, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2009a) Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2009b) ‘Realizing the Responsibility to Protect’, International Studies Perspectives, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 111–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2010) ‘The Responsibility to Protect — Five Years On’, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 143–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2011) ‘Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm’, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 263–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., O. Waever and J. de Wilde (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J. D. (2012) ‘Generational Analysis in IR Meets the World Values Survey’, in B. J. Steele and J. M. Acuff (eds), Theory and Application of the ‘Generation’ in International Relations and Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, S. (2002) Just War or Just Peace? Humanitarian Intervention and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chollet, D. (2005) The Road to the Dayton Accords: A Study of American Statecraft (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, J. and T. Weiss (1992) ‘Sovereignty Is No Longer Sacrosanct’, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, W. (2009) ‘Rwanda Guild Led to Kosovo Intervention’, Balkan Insight, 2 November. Available online at: www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/clinton-rwanda-guilt-led-to-kosovo-intervention

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘The Crisis in Libya: Bosnia’s Long Shadow over British Foreign Policy’ (2011) The Economist, 15 March. Available online at: www.economist.com/node/21016925

  • Clough, M. (2005) ‘Darfur: Whose Responsibility to Protect?’, Human Rights Watch World Report, 2005 (New York: Human Rights Watch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Institute of International Affairs (1999) Humanitarian Intervention: Legal and Political Aspects (Copenhagen: Danish Institute of International Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, F., S. Kimaro, T. Lyons, D. Rothschild and W. Zartman (1996) Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, A. (2005) ‘Who Are the Darfurians? Arab and African Identities, Violence, and External Engagement’, African Affairs, vol. 104, no. 415, pp. 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfuss, R. (2011) ‘Obama’s Women Advisers Pushed War against Libya’, The Nation, 19 March. Available online at: www.thenation.comb/blog/159346/obamas-women-advisers-pushed-war-against-libya

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2008) The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2008) ‘Responsibility to Protect: An Idea Whose Time has Come … and Gone?’, International Relations, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 283–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2009) ‘From an Idea to an International Norm’, in R. H. Cooper and J. V. Kohler (eds), Responsibility to Protect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2011) ‘UN Targets Libya with Pinpoint Accuracy’, The Age, 24 March. Available online at: www.gevans.org/opeds/oped110.html

  • Feinstein, L. and A. M. Slaughter (2004) ‘A Duty to Prevent’, Foreign Affairs, no. 136, January/February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixdal, M. and D. Smith (1998) ‘Humanitarian Intervention and Just War’, Mershon International Studies Review, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, A. (2011) ‘Susan Rice in Libya and Rwanda for the US R2P’, 25 November. Available online at: www.anngarrison.com/audio/susan-rice-in-libya-and-rwanda-for-the-us-r2p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelvin, J. (2012) The Arab Uprisings: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, R. (2011) ‘Beyond Libya: A World Ready to Respond to Mass Violence’, The Stanley Foundation. Available online at: www.stanleyfoundation.org/resources.cfm?id=462

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Hearing of the International Security, International Organization and Human Rights Subcommittee of the House Foreign Affairs Committee’, 17 May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. (2011) ‘Clinton Cites Rwanda, Bosnia in Rationale for Libyan Intervention’, ABC News, 17 March. Available online at: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/03/clinton-cites-rwanda-bosnia-in-rationale-for-libya-intervention/

    Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, A. (2010) Humanitarian Intervention: An Introduction (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, E. A. (2007) ‘The Rhetoric of Genocide in US Foreign Policy: Rwanda and Darfur Compared’, Political Science Quarterly, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 359–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, E. A. (2013) ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, in Z. P. Messitte and S. Grillot (eds), Understanding the Global Community (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press), pp. 66–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. W. (2010) Understanding International Law (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herborth, B. (2012) ‘Toward a Sociology of Generational Change’, in B. J. Steele and J. M. Acuff (eds), Theory and Application of the ‘Generation’ in International Relations and Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenrath, J. (2011) ‘Gates Says Libya Not Vital National Interest’, The Wall Street Journal, 27 March. Available online at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014 24052748704308904576226704261420430.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, A. (2002) ‘Norms and Ethics in International Relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations (New York: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. (2003) ‘I Am Iraq’, New York Times Magazine, 23 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) (2001) The Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre).

    Google Scholar 

  • IRIN (2012) ‘Briefing: Why Humanitarians Are Wary of ‘Humanitarian Corridors’, IRIN, 19 March. Available online at: www.irinnews.org/Report/95101/Briefing-Why-humanitarians-wary-of-humanitarian-corridors

  • Juppé, A. (2011) ‘The Arab Spring: Hopes and Challenges’, The Brookings Institution, 6 June, available online at: www.brookings.edu/~/media/events/2011/6/06%20arab%20spring%20juppe/20110606_arab_spring_juppe.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. (2011) ‘Failed Analogy’, The New Republic, 17 March. Available online at: www.tnr.com/article/crossings/85355/libya-obama-iraq-vietnam-foreign-policy

  • Khong, Y. F. (1992) Analogies at War (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosovo Commission (Independent International Commission on Kosovo) (2000) The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kurth, J. (2005) ‘Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq: Legal Ideals vs. Military Realities’, Orbis, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ‘The Lessons of Libya’ (2011) The Economist, 19 May. Available online at: www.economist.com/node/18709571

  • Mandelbaum, M. (1996) ‘Foreign Policy as Social Work’, Foreign Affairs, January/February, pp. 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, T. (2011) ‘Samantha Power’s Case for War on Libya’, The Daily Beast, 22 March. Available online at: www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/03/23/libya-war-samantha-power-and-the-case-for-liberal-interventionism.html

  • Moses, J., B. Bahador and T. Wright (2011) ‘The Iraq War and the Responsibility to Protect: Uses, Abuses and Consequences for the Future of Humanitarian Intervention’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 347–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, N. G. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, G. (2002) ‘The Liberal Quandary over Iraq’, The New York Times, 8 December. Available online at: www.nytimes.com/2002/12/08/magazine/08LIBERALS.html?pagewanted=all

  • ‘Powell’s Address to the United Nations: Reaction’ (2003) National Public Radio, 6 February. Available online at: www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=980412

  • Power, S. (2001) ‘Bystanders to Genocide’, The Atlantic Magazine, September. Available online at: www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2001/09/bystanders-to-genocide/4571/

  • Power, S. (2003) ‘A Problem from Hell’: America and the Age of Genocide, 3rd edn (New York: Harper Perennial).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur to the United Nations Secretary General’ (2005) United Nations, Geneva, 25 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramoin, F. E. (2012) ‘Why Intervention in Libya Was Justified’, e-International Relations, 25 January. Available online at: www.e-ir.info/2012/01/25/why-intervention-in-libya-was-justified

  • Rice, S. (2007) ‘The Genocide in Darfur: America Must Do More to Fulfill the Responsibility to Protect’, The Brookings Institution. Available online at: www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2007/10/24darfur-rice-opp08

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogin, J. (2011) ‘Anne-Marie Slaughter Calls for Intervention in Libya’, Foreign Policy, 24 February, available online at: http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/02/24/anne_marie_slaughter_tweets_call_for_intervention_in_libya

  • Roskin, M. (1974) ‘From Pearl Harbor to Vietnam: Shifting Generational Paradigms and Foreign Policy’, Political Science Quarterly, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 563–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. (2004) ‘War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention’, in Human Rights Watch World Report 2004: Human Rights and Armed Conflict (New York: Human Rights Watch), pp. 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W. and K. Stiles (2009) International Norms and Cycles of Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2003) ‘Good Reasons for Going around the UN’, The New York Times, 18 March. Available online at: www.nytimes.com/2003/03/18/opinion/good-reasons-for-going-around-the-un.html

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2011) ‘A Day to Celebrate, but Hard Work Ahead’, Foreign Policy, 18 March. Available online at: www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/03/18/does_the_world_belong_in_libyas_war?page=0,7

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2012) ‘How to Halt the Butchery in Libya’, The New York Times, 23 February. Available online at: www.nytimes.com/2012/02/24/opinion/how-to-halt-the-butchery-in-syria.html?_r=1

  • Stedman, S. J. (2007) ‘UN Transformation in an Era of Soft Balancing’, International Affairs, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 933–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, B. J. (2008) Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-identity and the IR state (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, B. J. (2012) ‘Never Trust Anyone who Remembers Jerry Rubin: The Promise of Generational Conflict’, in B. J. Steele and J. M. Acuff (eds), Theory and Application of the ‘Generation’ in International Relations and Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, B. J. and J. Acuff (2012) ‘Introduction: The Evolution of Generational Analysis and International Theory’, in B. J. Steele and J. M. Acuff (eds), Theory and Application of the ‘Generation’ in International Relations and Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg, S. G. (2011) ‘Still Crusading, but Now on the Inside’, The New York Times, 29 March. Available online at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/30/world/30power.html?_r=3&ref=samanthapower

  • Strauss, W. and N. Howe (1991) Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069 (New York: Morrow).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Sudan Can’t Wait (2004) The Economist, 31 July. Available online at: www.economist.com/node/2963177

  • ‘Sudan News Agency on MSF’s “Categorical Rejection” of Powell’s Darfur Remarks’ (2004) BBC Monitoring Middle East — Political, 16 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. (2004) ‘Western Medicine is No Cure for Darfur’s Ills’, Australian Financial Review, 31 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. (2005) ‘Iraq and the Responsibility to Protect’, Global Dialogue, vol. 7, nos 1–2, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly (2005) ‘2005 World Summit Outcome’, UN Doc. A/RES/60/1, 24 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘US Senate Leader Insists ‘Genocide’ Underway in Darfur, Despite EU Statement’ (2004) Agence France Presse, 10 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, N. J. (2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, N. J. (2003) ‘Humanitarian Intervention after September 11, 2001’, in A. F. Lang, Jr. (ed.), Just Intervention (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, N. J. and T. Dunne (2001) ‘East Timor and the New Humanitarian Interventionism’, International Affairs, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 805–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. D. (2011) ‘The Road to Humanitarian War in Libya’, Global Responsibility to Protect, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 248–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. D. and A. J. Bellamy (2005) ‘The Responsibility to Protect and the Crisis in Darfur’, Security Dialogue, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, M. and M. D. Hais (2008) Millennial Makeover (Camden: Rutgers University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintour, P. and N. Watt (2011) ‘David Cameron’s Libya War’, The Guardian, 2 October. Available online at: www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/oct/02/david-cameron-libyan-war-analysis

  • Youde, J. (2012) ‘The Generational Shift in South African Policy’, in B. J. Steele and J. M. Acuff (eds), Theory and Application of the ‘Generation’ in International Relations and Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Eric A. Heinze and Brent J. Steele

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heinze, E.A., Steele, B.J. (2013). The (D)evolution of a Norm: R2P, the Bosnia Generation and Humanitarian Intervention in Libya. In: Hehir, A., Murray, R. (eds) Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273956_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics