Abstract
In the last few decades, environment has become a contentious theme in Brazil’s national politics. The country’s environmental challenges are directly linked to its vibrant economic growth, which relies on primary industry with significant and growing energy demands. The increasing share of commodities in export value, from 23 percent in 2000 to 46.7 percent in 2012, has driven the so- called ‘ re- primarization’ of the economy (Figure 10.1). The national development program (Growth Acceleration Program), based on the expansion of agricultural land, energy production and infrastructure, has sparked harsh criticisms from civil society organizations and environmentalists regarding negative impacts such as biodiversity loss, erosion of ecosystem services and social disruptions (Fearnside, 2006; Zhouri and Laschefski, 2010). At the same time, the country hosts approximately 65 percent of a mega-biodiversity biome and important carbon sink, which makes land cover change a key environmental concern at the global scale. Pressured by its uncomfortable position as one of the top greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters, mostly from deforestation and land use (La Rovere et al., 2013), the government faces major conflict between carbon mitigation policies and the national development agenda, based on expansion of extractive industries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovay, R. and Magalhães, R. (2008) The Access of Family Farmers to Biodiesel Markets: Partnerships between Large Companies and Social Movements (London: IIED).
Acselrad, H. (2008) ‘Grassroots Reframing in Environmental Struggles in Brazil’, in D.V. Carruthers (eds), Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promises and Practice (Cambridge: MIT Press).
Brito, B. and Barreto, P. (2011) ‘Regularização Fundiária na Amazônia e o Programa Terra Legal’, in S. Sauer and W. Almeida (eds), Terras e Territórios na Amazônia: Demandas, Desafios e Perspectivas (Brasília: Editora UNB).
Castro, F. (2012) ‘ Multi-scale Environmental Citizenship: Traditional Populations and Protected Areas in Brazil’, in A. Latta and H. Wittman (eds), Environmental and Citizenship in Latin America: Natures, Subjects and Struggles (New York: Berghahn Books).
CIMC. (Comitê Interministerial sobre Mudança do Clima) (2008) ‘Plano Nacional sobre Mudança de Clima’, http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/smcq_climaticas/_arquivos/plano_nacional_mudanca_clima.pdf date accessed 10 May 2013.
Diegues, A.C.S. (1994) O Mito da Natureza Intocada (Sao Paulo: NUPAUB).
EcoDebate. (2012) ‘O Brasil perdeu mais de 45 mil quilômetros quadrados de áreas protegidas nos últimos 30 anos’, Eco Debate. http://www.ecodebate.com.br/2012/12/21/o-brasil-perdeu-mais-de-45-mil-quilometros-quadrados-de-areas-protegidas-nos-ultimos-30-anos/ date accessed 10 May 2013.
EPE. (2007) Plano Decenal de Expansão de Energia –PDE 2007–2016 (Brasil: MME, SPDE).
Fearnside, P.M. (1995) ‘Hydroelectric Dams in the Brazilian Amazon as Sources of “Greenhouse” Gases’, Environmental Conservation 22(1): 7–19.
Fearnside, P.M. (2005) ‘Brazil’s Samuel Dam: Lessons from Hydroelectric Development Policy and the Environment in Amazon’, Environmental Management 35(1): 1–19.
Fearnside, P.M. (2006) ‘Dams in the Amazon: Belo Monte and Brazil’s Hydroelectric Development of the Xingu River Basin’, Environmental Management 38(1): 16–27.
Friberg, L. (2009) ‘Varieties of Carbon Governance: The Clean Development Mechanism in Brazil –A Success Story Challenged’, The Journal of Environment and Development 18(4): 395–424.
Hall, A. and Brandford, S. (2012) ‘Development, Dams, and Dilma: The Saga of Belo Monte’, Critical Sociology 38(6): 851–62.
Hochstetler, K. and Keck, M.E. (2007) Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society (Durham: Duke University Press).
Hochstetler, K. and Viola, E. (2013) ‘Brazil and the Politics of Climate Change: Beyond the Global Commons’, Environmental Politics 21(5): 753–71.
ISA. (2009) Atlas of Pressures and Threats to Indigenous Lands in the Brazilian Amazon (São Paulo: ISA).
La Rovere, E.L. Dubeux, C.B. Pereira Jr., A.O. and Wills, W. (2013) ‘Brazil Beyond 2020: From Deforestation to the Energy Challenge’, Climate Policy 13(1): 70–86.
Lemos, M.C. and Roberts, J.T. (2008) ‘Environmental Policy- Making Networks and the Future of the Amazon’, Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 363(1498): 1897–1902.
McAllister, L. (2008) Making Law Matter: Environmental Protection and Legal Institutions in Brazil (Stanford: Stanford Law Books).
Medeiros, R. (2006) ‘Evolução das Tipologias e Categorias de Áreas Protegidas no Brasil’, Ambiente e Sociedade 9(1): 41–64.
Mello, N.A. (2006) Políticas Territoriais na Amazônia (São Paulo: Annablume)
Mueller, C.C. (2009) ‘Agricultural, Agrarian, and Environmental Policy Formation under Lula: The Role of Policy Networks’, in W. Baer and J.L. Love (eds), Brazil under Lula: Economy, Politics, and Society Under the Worker- President (New York: Palgrave MacMillan).
Portal do Purus. (2012) ‘Relatório da CPT acusa o “Terra Legal” de favorecer os latifundiários’, http://www.portaldopurus.com.br/index.php/cidades/bocado-acre/7704-relatorio-da-cpt-acusa-o-terra-legal-de-favorecer-os-latifundiarios date accessed 10 May 2013.
Reporter Brasil. (2010) ‘Family Farming and the National Biodiesel Programme: A Portrait of the Present; Perspective for the Future’, http://reporterbrasil.org.br/documentos/FactsheetAGR_English.pdf date accessed 10 May 2013.
Sauer, S. and Almeida, W. (eds) (2011) Terras e Territórios na Amazônia: Demandas, Desafios e Perspectivas (Brasília: Editora UNB).
Sawyer, D. (2008) ‘Climate Change, Biofuels and Eco- Social Impacts in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado’, Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 363(1498): 1747–1752.
Sparovek, G. Berndes, G. Barretto, A.G.O.P. and Klug, I.L.F. (2012) ‘The Revision of the Brazilian Forest Act: Increased Deforestation or a Historic Step Towards Balancing Agricultural Development and Nature Conservation?’, Environmental Science and Policy 16: 65–72.
Tollefson, J. (2009) ‘Paying to Save the Rainforests’, Nature News 460: 936–937.
Toni, F. (2011) ‘Decentralization and REDD+ in Brazil’, Forests 2(1): 66–85.
Viola, E. (2004) ‘Brazil in the Context of Global Governance Politics and Climate Change, 1989–2003’, Ambiente e Sociedade 7(1): 27–46.
Viola, E. (2010) ‘A Política Climática Global e o Brasil: 2005–2010’, Revista Tempo do Mundo 2: 82–117.
Wilkinson, J. and Herrera, S. (2010) ‘Biofuels in Brazil: Debates and Impacts’, Journal of Peasant Studies 37(4): 749–768.
Wolford, W. (2008) ‘Environmental Justice and Agricultural Development in the Brazilian Cerrado’, in D.V. Carruthers (eds), Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promises, and Practice (Cambridge: MIT Press).
Zhouri, A. and Laschefski, K. (eds) (2010) Desenvolvimento e Conflitos Ambientais (Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Fábio de Castro
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Castro, F. (2014). Environmental Policies in the Lula Era: Accomplishments and Contradictions. In: de Castro, F., Koonings, K., Wiesebron, M. (eds) Brazil Under the Workers’ Party. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273819_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273819_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44543-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27381-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)