Skip to main content

Participation as Representation: Democratic Policymaking in Brazil

  • Chapter

Abstract

That political representation faces a crisis has become an old and wornout claim. It is a claim as old as political representation itself, the essential principles of which have been translated into a set of institutional devices that have remained in place almost intact since the eighteenth century (Manin, 1996; Urbinati, 2006). If the structure of representative government has not been significantly modified since its inception, one can perhaps assume that some of the symptoms of crisis (low electoral turnout, rising political apathy, distrust in political institutions and actors, decrease of party membership and mobilization, proportionality deficits of electoral systems, etc.) may simply be indications of a transformation in how political representation expresses itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avritzer, Leonardo. (2009). Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin. (1984). Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James. (1996). Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiglione, Dario e Warren, Mark. (2006). “Rethinking Democratic Representation: Eight Theoretical Issues.” Manuscript prepared for delivery at the Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Joshua. (1989) [1997]. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In: Bohman, James and Rehg, William (eds). Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, James. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geissel, Brigitte. (2009). “How to Improve the Quality of Democracy? Experiences with Participative Innovations at the Local Level in Germany,” German Politics and Society, Issue 93, Vol. 27, No. 4 Winter, pp. 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, Amy. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. (1998). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions for a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, Bernard. (1996). Principes du Gouvernement Représentatif. Paris: Calmann-Levy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, Jane. (1983). Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2003). “Rethinking Representation,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 4, pp. 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carole. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebinschi, Thamy. (2010a). Relatório Final da Pesquisa “Entre Participação e Representação: as conferências nacionais e o experimentalismo democrático brasileiro.” Série Pensando o Direito, Ministério da Justiça, Brasília.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2010b). “Democracia Pragmática”. In: Dados, Revista de Ciências Sociais, Volume 53, número 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2010c). “Participação como Representação. Conferências Nacionais e Políticas Públicas para Grupos Minoritários no Brasil”. Paper apresentado no 34° Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais (ANPOCS).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2012a). “Participação como Método Democrático de Gestão. As conferências nacionais de políticas públicas durante o Governo Lula”. Paper prepared to be presented at the workshop The PT from Lula to Dilma: Explaining Change in the Brazilian Worker’s Party. Brazilian Studies Programme, University of Oxford, January 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2012b). “Strengthening Representation through Participation.” Paper prepared to be presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, University of Antwerp, Belgium, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sintomer, Yves. (2007). Le pouvoir au peuple. Jurys citoyens, tirage au sort et démocratie participative. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, Nadia. (2006). Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Maxwell A. Cameron Eric Hershberg Kenneth E. Sharpe

Copyright information

© 2012 Maxwell A. Cameron, Eric Hershberg, and Kenneth E. Sharpe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pogrebinschi, T. (2012). Participation as Representation: Democratic Policymaking in Brazil. In: Cameron, M.A., Hershberg, E., Sharpe, K.E. (eds) New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137270580_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics