Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to analyzing and evaluating the interface between religion and society in contemporary Ethiopia. Characteristic of this paradigm is an ethnic federalism and identity politics where despite living in the same country, people are distinguished according to ethnic, linguistic, cultural, even religious divisions. Therefore, I characterize this paradigm in terms of “compartmentalization.” I prefer the term compartmentalization to fragmentation because of the organizational dimension of the paradigm. This organizational aspect comes from two sources. First, despite the ethnic division, the underlying unitary historical consciousness created by the notion of covenant still links the ethnic compartments. Second, the organizational dimension comes from the fact that the system is set up in such a way that the federal government can control the regional governments. The question will be asked as to whether or not this paradigm espouses any philosophical assumption underlying its political ideology and social order. Of especial interest is the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front’s (EPRDF’s) intention to use the issue of “marginalized people groups” as its moral discourse. I will make an inquiry into the potential of the new system to solve the problems left open by the paradigm of demystification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Richard Rorty (1999), “Richard Rorty: An Appreciation of Jacques Derrida”: http://www.service.stanford.edu/news/1999/april21/rortytext-421.html.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fred Hutchison (2004), “Crisis of the Postmodern Worldview”: http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/041209.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Gada system is not a socioreligious practice exclusively limited to Oromos. Asmarom Legesse shows it is also practiced among Sidamo, Darasa, Burji, Conso, and Gidole ethnic groups. See Asmarom Legesse’s book: Gada: Three Approaches to the Study of African Society (New York: Free Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Lovise Aelen Ethnic Federalism in a Dominant Party State: The Ethiopian Experience 1991–2000. (Chr. Michelsen Institute, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Mohammed Girma

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Girma, M. (2012). The Hermeneutic of Compartmentalization. In: Understanding Religion and Social Change in Ethiopia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269423_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics