Abstract
Since transition in the mid-1980s, the Uruguayan political and social context has often been characterized by a tension between the will to remember and the endeavor to forget. Numerous governments tried to enforce collective amnesia upon society to anesthetize it from the pain suffered (Bergero and Reati 1997)—a sort of top-down imposition of official silence wishing to eliminate from memory the blame laid upon human rights violators and the justice desired by victims (Moraña 1997).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
están en algún sitio / nube o tumba
están en algún sitio / estoy seguro
allá en el sur del alma
—Mario Benedetti, poem “Desaparecidos”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Francesca Lessa
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lessa, F. (2013). Pacification or Impunity?. In: Memory and Transitional Justice in Argentina and Uruguay. Memory Politics and Transitional Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269393_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269393_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44391-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-26939-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)