A Solidary God

Part of the Palgrave Macmillan’s Content and Context in Theological Ethics book series (CCTE)


This ethic arises from and makes particular claims for the centrality of love expressed among human beings as a fulfillment of love for and obedience to God. God is the One who first loved us, with a solidary love, a love that entered into our condition in the person of the human being Jesus, the One who was and is the incarnate Christ, the One who continues to indwell humanity as the Holy Spirit. Faithfulness is seeking to live into that mutual, solidary love: we follow God into a deeper understanding of our fellow human beings and of ourselves, in order to love ourselves and our neighbors into more abundant lives, through spiritual and material liberations and transformations.


Social Location Racist Oppression Solidary Relationship Power Awareness Human Likeness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ada María Isasi-Díaz, Mujerista Theology: A Theology for the Twenty-First Century (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1996), 89–90.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ada María Isasi-Díaz —, “Solidarity: Love of Neighbor in the Twenty-First Century,” in Lift Every Voice: Constructing Christian Theologies from the Underside, ed. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite and Mary Potter Engel (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1998), 31.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frederick Herzog, Justice Church: The New Function of the Church in North American Christianity (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1980), 93.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jon Sobrino, Where Is God? Earthquake, Terrorism, Barbarity and Hope (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2004), 18.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite and Mary Potter Engel, eds., Lift Every Voice: Constructing Christian Theologies from the Underside (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1998), 3.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Andrea Smith, “Walking in Balance: The Spirituality/Liberation Praxis of Native Women,” in Lift Every Voice: Constructing Christian Theologies from the Underside, ed. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite and Mary Potter Engel (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1998), 53.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Linda Alcoff, “The Problem of Speaking for Others,” in Feminist Nightmares: Women at Odds—Feminism and the Problem of Sisterhood, ed. Susan Ostrov Weisser and Jennifer Fleischner (New York: New York University Press, 1994), 286.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    Mark Lewis Taylor, “Subalternity and Advocacy as Kairos for Theology,” in Opting for the Margins: Postmodernity and Liberation in Christian Theology, ed. Joerg Rieger (New York: Oxford Press, 2003), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 22.
    Sallie McFague, The Body of God: An Ecological Theology (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1993), 14.Google Scholar
  10. 27.
    Kevin F., Burke, S.J., “Christian Salvation and the Disposition of Transcendence: Ignacio Ellacuría’s Historical Soteriology,” in Love That Produces Hope: The Thought of Ignacio Ellacuría, ed. Kevin F., Burke, S.J. and Robert Lassalle-Klein (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2006), 175–77.Google Scholar
  11. 29.
    Ignacio Ellacuría, “The Crucified People,” in Systematic Theology: Perspectives from Liberation Theology (Readings from Mysterium Liberationis), ed. Jon Sobrino and Ignacio Ellacuría (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1996), 261.Google Scholar
  12. 30.
    Jon Sobrino, Jesus the Liberator: A Historical-Theological View (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1994), 69.Google Scholar
  13. 32.
    Aquiles Ernesto Martínez, “Jesus, the Immigrant Child: A Diasporic Reading of Matthew 2:1–23,” Apuntes: Reflexiones Teológicas desde el Contexto Hispano-Latino 26, no. 3 (2006): 85ff.Google Scholar
  14. 33.
    Virgilio Elizondo, Galilean Journey: The Mexican American Promise (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2000), 51.Google Scholar
  15. 37.
    Ibid., Sobrino is quoting J.B. Metz, “Hacia una cristología después de Auschwitz,” Selecciones de Teología 158 (2001), 114.Google Scholar
  16. 42.
    Audre Lorde, “Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power,” in Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches (Berkeley, CA: The Crossing Press, 1984), 53ff. Lorde describes the erotic as “a resource within each of us that lies in a deeply female and spiritual plane firmly rooted in the power of our unexpressed or unrecognized feeling …. It is an internal sense of self and the chaos of our strongest feelings. It is an internal sense of satisfaction to which, once we have experienced it, we know we can aspire. For having experienced the fullness of this depth of feeling and recognizing its power, in honor and self-respect we can require no less of ourselves …. For the erotic is not a question only of what we do; it is a question of how acutely and fully we can feel in the doing.”Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tammerie Day 2012

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations