Skip to main content

Art

  • Chapter

Part of the Radical Theologies book series (RADT)

Abstract

Art and religion are both concerned with meaning. And yet, the social function of both activities has been called into question throughout the modern period. In fact, the modern period is largely defined by the replacement of religion by art. If this replacement coincides with the rise of capitalism, this is not accidental—the utility of art and the category of aesthetics in maintaining social order is crucial. The production of affect (usually along the lines of reinforcing a sense of awe) was a chief function of art in the service of religion and would subsequently work as a kind of distraction and escape from the brutality of capitalism. Indeed, throughout most of human history, religion and art were inextricably linked. The rituals of the former produced the masterpieces of the latter. Not until Westerners scrutinized this process, first in Greece and then in Europe during the Enlightenment, did the category of art begin to emerge—liberated from its enslavement to religion only to find itself functioning in a propagandistic capacity for power. Art, as a category, is at once self-evident and elusive. The label is given to both the result of artmaking (the object of art, a noun) and to the act of making itself (artfulness). One may produce art objects, and one may master the art of conversation. In both cases, we are confronted with an exceptional case—the result of a subject engaging in an activity with great care, inspiration, and devotion beyond everyday utility.

Keywords

  • Modern Period
  • Pure Reason
  • Death Anxiety
  • Socialist Revolution
  • Chief Function

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Non-imperial art must be as rigorous as a mathematical demonstration, as surprising as an ambush in the night, and as elevated as a star.

Alain Badiou, Thesis 12, Fifteen Theses on Contemporary Art

The backdrop against which art now stands out is a particular state of society. What an installation, a performance, a concept or a mediated image can do is to mark a possible or real shift with respect to the laws, the customs, the measures, the mores, the technical and organizational devices that define how we must behave and how we may relate to each other at a given time and in a given place. What we look for in art is a different way to live, a fresh chance at coexistence.

Brian Holmes, Escape the Overcode: Activist Art in the Control Society

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1057/9781137268938_4
  • Chapter length: 14 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-137-26893-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See John H. Zammito, The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment, trans. Werner S. Pluhar (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1987), p. 15

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mark C. Taylor, Confidence Games: Money and Markets in a World Without Redemption (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedrich Nietzsche, Basic Writings of Nietzsche, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random House, 1968), p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Friedrich Nietzsche, “First Essay,” On The Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, trans. and ed. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random House, 1957), pp. 24–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henri, comte de St.-Simon, “The Artist, the Savant, and the Industrialist,” in Art in Theory 1815–1900: An Anthology of Changing Ideas, ed. Charles Harrison and Paul Wood with Jason Gaiger (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hakim Bey, TAZ: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism (Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia, 1985): http://hermetic.com/bey/taz_cont.html.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra & Simulation, trans. Sheila Faria Glaser (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Nicolas Bourriaud, Relational Aesthetics, trans. Simon Pleasance and Fronda Woods (Dijon: les presses du réel, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Gabriel Vahanian, The Death of God: The Culture of Our Post-Christian Era (New York: George Braziller, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Terry Eagleton, The Ideology of the Aesthetic (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1991), p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Félix Guattari, Chaosmosis: An Ethico-aesthetic Paradigm (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995), p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph Beuys, “I Am Searching for a Field Character,” Energy Plan for the Western Man: Joseph Beuys in America, compiled by Carin Kuoni (New York: Four Walls Eight Windows, 1990), pp. 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joseph Beuys, What is Art?, trans. Matthew Barton and Shelley Sacks, ed. Volker Harlan (Forest Row: Clairview Books, 2004), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Catherine Malabou, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, trans. Sebastian Rand (New York: Fordham University Press, 2008), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jacques Rancière, The Politics of Aesthetics, trans. Gabriel Rockhill (London: Continuum, 2004), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Clayton Crockett & Jeffrey W. Robbins

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, M.W. (2012). Art. In: Religion, Politics, and the Earth. Radical Theologies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137268938_4

Download citation