Advertisement

Employment Standards in Transition: From Fordism to Finance-Driven Capitalism

  • Max Koch
Part of the Work and Welfare in Europe book series (RECOWE)

Abstract

In a recent historical overview of theoretical concepts of processes of standardization and diversification, Mark Elchardus (2011) demonstrates that these have varied considerably over time. Some theorists, like Max Weber or George Ritzer, saw society as moving towards ever-increasing standardization; other commentators, like Théophile Gautier or John Stuart Mill, strongly defended and gave preference to individuality, flexibility and sociocultural diversity, distancing themselves from any standardization of social action. In attempting to overcome such extreme views, Elchardus examines the interrelation between standardization and flexibility/diversity and argues that it does not make sense to talk of any one of these in isolation, without reference to its counterpart. In contrast, the existence of and the respect for generally agreed economic and social standards is normally the precondition of flexibility and diversity and define their scope. Chaos and disintegration both at the system and social level (Lockwood, 1992) would be the likely result without such agreements on social standards.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Hedge Fund Employment Protection Temporary Employment Foreign Direct Investment Inflow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aglietta, M. (1987) A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience, 2nd edition, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Alonso, L. E. and Martínez Lucio, M. (eds) (2006) Employment Relations in a Changing Society: Assessing the Post-Fordist Paradigm, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (2003) Firing Back. Against the Tyranny of the Market 2, London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, R. (1995) ‘Capital-Labour Relations in OECD Countries: From the Fordist Golden Age to Contrasted National Trajectories’, in Schor, J. and You, J.-L. (eds) Capital, the State and Labour. A Global Perspective, Aldershot: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boyer, R. (2000) ‘Is a Finance-led Growth Regime a Viable Alternative to Fordism? A Preliminary Analysis’, Economy and Society 29 (1): 111–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyer, R. and Saillard, Y. (eds) (2002) Régulation Theory. The State of the Art, London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, D. and Gold, M. (2007) ‘Academics on Non-Standard Contracts in UK Universities: Portfolio Work, Choice and Compulsion’, Higher Education Quarterly 61 (4): 439–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dörre, K. (2010) ‘Landnahme und soziale Klassen. Zur Relevanz sekundärer Ausbeutung’, in Thien, H. G. (ed) Klassen im Postfordismus, Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  9. Elchardus, M. (2011) ‘Diversity and Standardization: Concepts, Issues and Approaches’, in Koch, M., McMillan, L. and Peper, B. (eds) Diversity, Standardization and Social Transformation. Gender, Ethnicity and Inequality in Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (different volumes) Statistical Annex of European Economy, Luxembourg: Office of the Official Publications of European Communities.Google Scholar
  11. Farrell, D., Fölster, C. S. and Lund, S. (2008) ‘Long-term Trends in the Global Capital Markets’, The McKinsey Quarterly, Economic Studies, February.Google Scholar
  12. Foster, J. B. and Magdoff, F. (2009) The Great Financial Crisis, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gowan, P. (1999) The Global Gamble: Washington’s Bid for World Dominance, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Harvey, D. (2005) The New Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kashefi, M. (2007) ‘Work Flexibility and its Individual Consequences’, Canadian Journal of Sociology 32 (3): 341–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koch, M. (2006a) Roads to Post-Fordism. Labour Markets and Social Structures in Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Koch, M. (2006b) ‘Pierre Bourdieu as Sociologist of the Economy and Critic of “Globalization”’, International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 43 (1): 71–86.Google Scholar
  18. Koch, M. (2008) ‘The State in European Employment Regulation’, Journal of European Integration 30 (2): 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koch, M. (2011) ‘Diversity and Standardization in European Employment Regulation: the Case of Germany’, in Koch, M., McMillan, L. and Peper, B. (eds) Diversity, Standardization and Social Transformation. Gender, Ethnicity and Inequality in Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Koch, M. (2012) Capitalism and Climate Change — Theoretical Discussion, Historical Development and Policy Responses, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Koch, M., McMillan, L. and Peper, B. (2011) ‘Diversity, Standardization and the Perspective of Social Transformation’, in Koch, M., McMillan, L. and Peper, B. (eds) Diversity, Standardization and Social Transformation. Gender, Ethnicity and Inequality in Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  22. Krugman, P. (2009) The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008, New York/ London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  23. Laparra, M. (2006) La Construcción del empleo precario, Madrid: FOESSA/Cáritas.Google Scholar
  24. Lockwood, D. (1992) Solidarity and Schism. ‘The Problem of Disorder’ in Durkheimian and Marxian Sociology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Marx, K. (1974) ‘Theorien über den Mehrwert. Zweiter Teil’, in Marx-Engels-Werke (MEW), Volume 26.2, Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  26. OECD (2004) Employment Outlook, Paris.Google Scholar
  27. Onaran, Ö. (2012) ‘A Wage Led Recovery Would Help Reverse Inequalities, Increase Demand, and Help the EU to Get Out of its Crisis’, blog at the London School of Economics website from 21 April 2012, available online at http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/2012/04/21/economicrecovery-eu-onaran.Google Scholar
  28. Parkin, F. (1979) Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique, Cambridge: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  29. Paugam, S. (2000) Le Salarié de la précarité. Les nouvelles formes de l’integration professionelle, Paris: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
  30. Stiglitz, J. (2010) Freefall. Free Markets and the Sinking of the Global Economy, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  31. Stockhammer, E. (2008) ‘Some Stylized Facts on the Finance-dominated Accumulation Regime’, Competition and Change 12 (2): 184–202.Google Scholar
  32. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2009 and 2011) World Investment Report, New York/Geneva: United Nations Publication.Google Scholar
  33. Venn, D. (2009) ‘Legislation, Collective Bargaining and Enforcement: Updating the OECD Employment Protection Indicators’, Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Max Koch 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max Koch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations