Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Drawing Lessons from Wind Power for Future Sustainable Energy

  • Chapter
Learning from Wind Power

Part of the book series: Energy, Climate and the Environment Series ((ECE))

  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

The medium to long term outlook for global energy supply is extremely challenging, as Chapter 1 emphasised. In recognition of this, many countries are strongly promoting renewable energy, and much progress has been made. However, fossil fuels still meet the vast majority of global energy needs, and in consequence atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases continue to rise towards unsustainable levels. A dramatic increase in wind capacity has been seen worldwide (WWEA 2011), but a swift transition to renewables is beyond reach without major changes at the political and policymaking levels. Even within the EU — which has sought to position itself as a pioneer in climate and energy policy (Wurzel and Connelly 2011) — it has been acknowledged that ‘the existing strategy is currently unlikely to achieve all the 2020 targets, and it is wholly inadequate to the longer term challenges’ (European Commission 2010: 3). Therefore, the need and the urgency to further accelerate renewables deployment is clear. This requires diversification of renewable sources, as well as wide diffusion of existing and emergent renewable energy technologies (RETs). Yet it also requires clearer understanding of a range of challenges going beyond the technological dimensions, embracing the political, institutional, economic and social domains. Social science perspectives have therefore a crucial role to play in understanding and enabling the nascent energy transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, P. W., Hammond, G. P., Mcmanus, M.C. and Mezzullo, W.G. (2011) ‘Barriers to and drivers for UK bioenergy development’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 1217–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agterbosch, S., Meertens, R. M. and Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2009) ‘The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, M., McDonald, S. and Strachan, P. (2008) ‘Locating “power” in wind power planning processes: the (not so) influential role of local objectors’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51:6, 777–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, M. I. and Rodrigues, G. (2009) ‘Direct employment in the wind energy sector: an EU study’, Energy Policy, 37, 2847–2857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundlandt Report (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. (2010) ‘The good, the bad and the ugly: lessons from biogas plant planning applications’, ROOTS 2010, Plumpton College, East Sussex, 13–14 April 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • BWEA (British Wind Energy Association) (2008) Wind Energy in the UK: A BWEA State of the Industry Report, London, BWEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campoccia, A., Dusonchet, L., Telaretti, E. and Zizzo, G. (2009) ‘Comparative analysis of different supporting measures for the production of electrical energy by solar PV and wind systems: four representative European cases’, Solar Energy, 83, 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couture, T. and Gagnon, Y. (2010) ‘An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: implications for renewable energy investment’, Energy Policy, 38, 955–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P. (2005) ‘Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy’, Wind Energy, 8, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DTI (Department of Trade and Industry) (2007) Meeting the Energy Challenge: A White Paper on Energy, London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G., Barry, J. and Robinson, C. (2007) ‘Many ways to say “no”, different ways to say “yes”: applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50:4 (July), 517–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Warren, C., Strachan, P. and Szarka, J. (2009) ‘Wind power: a problem of planning, or of perception?’, Planning Theory and Practice, 10:4, 523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) ‘Commission staff working document: the support of electricity from renewable energy sources’, SEC(2008)57, 23 January 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) ‘Energy 2020: a strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy’, COM(2010) 639 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0639:FIN:EN:PDF, accessed on 4 July 2011.

  • European Commission (2011) ‘Renewable energy: progressing towards the 2020 target’, COM(2011) 31 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxon, T. J., Hammond, G. P. and Pearson, P. J. G. (2010) ‘Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77:8, 1203–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, D. (ed.) (2007) The New Energy Paradigm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarsh, R. (2010) ‘Wind farms and community engagement in Australia: a critical analysis for policy learning’, East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 4, 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2011) 2011 Budget, London: The Stationery Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvelplund, F. (2005) ‘Renewable energy: political prices or political quantities’, in Lauber, V. (ed.) Switching to Renewable Power: A Framework for the 21st Century, pp. 228–245, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S. and Bergek, A (2004) ‘Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology’, in Jacob, K., Binder, M. and Wieczorek, A. (eds) Governance for Industrial Transformation: Proceedings of the 2003 Berlin Conference On the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, pp. 208–236, Berlin: Environmental Policy Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. R., Orr, B. J. and Eiser, J. R. (2001) ‘When is enough, enough? Identifying predictors of capacity estimates for onshore wind-power development in a region of the UK, Energy Policy, 39, 4563–4577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldellis, J. K. and Zafirakis, D. (2011) ‘The wind energy (r)evolution: a short review of a long history’, Renewable Energy, 36, 1887–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauber, V. (2004) ‘REFIT and RPS: options for a harmonised community framework’, Energy Policy, 32, 1405–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, J. (2007) ‘Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom’, Energy Policy, 35, 5481–5495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, P. D. (2009) ‘Effects of energy policies on industry expansion in renewable energy’, Renewable Energy, 34, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüthi, S. and Prässler, T. (2011) ‘Analysing policy support instruments and regulatory risk factors for wind energy development — a developers’ perspective’, Energy Policy, 39, 4876–4892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, M. (2007) Feed-In Tariffs: Accelerating the Deployment of Renewable Energy, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, M., Lacey, S. and Hvelplund, F. (2009) ‘Stability, participation and transparency in renewable energy policy: lessons from Denmark and the United States’, Policy and Society, 27, 379–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, N. I. (2007) ‘Learning from wind energy policy in the EU: lessons from Denmark, Sweden and Spain’, European Environment, 17:5, 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. (2008) The Political Economy of Sustainable Energy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., Bauknecht, D. and Connor, P. M. (2006) ‘Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the Renewable Obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany’, Energy Policy, 34, 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moltke, A. von, McKee, C. and Morgan, T. (eds) (2004) Energy Subsidies: Lessons Learned in Assessing Their Impact and Designing Policy Reform, Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, S. and Driffill, L. (2008) ‘How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy’, Energy Policy, 36, 4412–4418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. (2010) ‘Trust and the transformation of energy systems’, Energy Policy, 38, 2617–2623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RenewableUK (2010) ‘Memorandum from RenewableUK (LOCO 087)’, Evidence provided to Communities and Local Government Committee inquiry into Localism, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmcomloc/writev/localism/loco087.htm, accessed on 24 September 2011.

  • Ringel, M. (2006) ‘Fostering the use of renewable energies in the European Union: the race between feed-in tariffs and green certificates’, Renewable Energy, 31, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E (1998) ‘Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings’, Energy Policy, 26:15, 1105–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. (2008) ‘Renewable energy: economically sound, politically difficult’, The Electricity Journal, 21:5, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundqvist, T. (2004) ‘What causes the disparity of electricity externality estimates?’, Energy Policy, 32:15, 1753–1766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szarka, J. (2007) Wind Power in Europe: Politics, Business and Society, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Szarka, J. (2010) ‘Bringing interests back in: using coalition theories to explain European wind power policies’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17:6, 838–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, M. (2011) ‘Trust and the public interest in the micropolitics of planning practice’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31:2, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toke, D. (2011) ‘Ecological modernisation, social movements and renewable energy’, Environmental Politics, 20:1, (February) 60–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upham, P. and Shackley, S. (2007) ‘Local public opinion of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Devon: questionnaire survey results’, Biomass Bioenergy, 31, 433–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webler, T. and Tuler, S. P. (2010) ‘Getting the engineering right is not always enough: researching the human dimensions of the new energy technologies’, Energy Policy, 38, 2690–2691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink, M. (2000) ‘Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significant of public support’, Renewable Energy, 21, 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink, M. (2006) ‘Invalid theory impedes our understanding; a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (New Series), 31, 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink, M. (2007) ‘Planning of renewables schemes: deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation’, Energy Policy, 35, 2692–2704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. and Dow, S. (2011) ‘What lessons have been learnt in reforming the renewables obligation? An analysis of internal and external failures in UK renewable energy policy’, Energy Policy, 39, 2228–2244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, B. and Mitchell, C. (2011) ‘Learning from experience? The development of the renewables obligation in England and Wales 2002–2010’, Energy Policy, 39, 3914–3921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, R. K. W. and Connelly, J. (eds) (2011) The European Union as a Leader in International Climate Change Politics, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. and Bürer, M. J. (2007) ‘Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation — an introduction to the concept’, Energy Policy, 35, 2683–2691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWEA (World Wind Energy Report) (2011) World Wind Energy Report 2010, http://www.wwindea.org/home/images/stories/pdfs/worldwindenergyreport2010_s.pdf, accessed on 9 May 2011.

Download references

Authors
  1. Joseph Szarka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geraint Ellis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Cowell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter A. Strachan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Charles Warren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies, University of Bath, UK

    Joseph Szarka (Reader in Policy Studies) (Reader in Policy Studies)

  2. School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, UK

    Richard Cowell (Reader in Environmental Planning) (Reader in Environmental Planning)

  3. School of Planning Architecture and Civil Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, UK

    Geraint Ellis (Senior Lecturer) (Senior Lecturer)

  4. Aberdeen Business School, Strategy and Policy Group, Robert Gordon University, UK

    Peter A. Strachan (Professor in Energy Policy and Management) (Professor in Energy Policy and Management)

  5. Department of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, UK

    Charles Warren (Senior Lecturer) (Senior Lecturer)

Copyright information

© 2012 Joseph Szarka, Geraint Ellis, Richard Cowell, Peter A. Strachan and Charles Warren

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szarka, J., Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Strachan, P.A., Warren, C. (2012). Drawing Lessons from Wind Power for Future Sustainable Energy. In: Szarka, J., Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Strachan, P.A., Warren, C. (eds) Learning from Wind Power. Energy, Climate and the Environment Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137265272_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation