Abstract
Arts Council England (ACE) is the main non-departmental public body (NPDB or quango) supporting the arts in England. As public funding increased in the 1990s and a dedicated department was created, arts policy became more politicized, drawing closer to the continental interventionist model while retaining idiosyncrasies such as additional funding through a national lottery, the discretionary dimension of local authority funding and the allocation of public funding at arm’s length from the DCMS (Department for Culture, Media and Sport). However, the latter’s capacity to stir ACE and its staff — who are not public servants — proved limited, causing contention between the traditionally reactive funding body and ministers looking for social and economic impacts and ultimately responsible before Parliament (Taylor, 1997; Doustaly, 2007). The end of the New Labour rule was associated with repeated attempts at modernizing ACE into an accountable and proactive development agency in a context of failing new public management (NPM) reforms, funding cuts and tensions with the arts community, and leading the organization to implement a wide-ranging restructuring (Doustaly and Gray, 2010). For cost-cutting and ideological reasons, the 2010 Coalition Government’s more distanced approach to arts policy has centred on pressure for efficiency, incentive to alternative funding, and civil society involvement as part of the Big Society Agenda.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
ACE Website National Archives Snapshots 1998–2012. URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/*/http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/(ACEα/replaceswww.artscouncil.org.uk/). Unless stated otherwise, references are to the 18 March 2012 archive.
ACE (2003a…2011a). ACE Annual Reviews (available online).
ACE (2008b–2008c). Procurement contracts: 31 March 2008, IT Systems Administration, Software Development, Consultancy Services and Support Activities; 27 October 2008: Digital Creative Agency Roste. URL: http://artscouncil.g2b.info/cgi-gen/profile.pl?action=view_profile&oid=4251#7.
ACE (2009b). ‘Arts Council England’s New Website Makes Discovering the Arts Easier for Everyone’. URL: http://press.artscouncil.org.uk/content/detail.aspx?ReleaseID=838&NewsAreaID=2.
ACE (2009c). Arts Council Organization Review, Briefing Note, 14 July 2009.
ACE (2010b). Achieving Great Art for Everyone, Consultation Report.
ACE (2011b). Arts Council Stakeholder Focus Research Programme. Headline Results 2011.
ACE (2012a). URL: http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/toolkits/
ACE (2012b). URL: http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/who-we-are/how-we-are-run/national-council/members-of-the-council
ACE (2012c). URL: www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/why-the-arts-matter/facts-and-figures/
ACE (2012d). URL: www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/our-mission/consultation-and-involvement
ACE-FOI (2012a). Brief for Redeveloping Our Corporate Website, undated.
ACE-FOI (2012b). Information Architecture Redesign, COGGAP Research Findings, June 2011.
ACE-FOI (2012c). E-mail answers to FOI request, 12 May 2012.
Aibar, E. (2010). ‘A Critical Analysis of Information Society Conceptualizations from an STS Point of View’, Cognition, Communication, Co-operation, 8–2: 177–182.
Belfiore, E. (2004). ‘Auditing Culture: The Subsidized Cultural Sector in the New Public Management’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10(2): 183–202.
Conservative Party (2010). The future of the arts with a conservative government.
Davey, A. (2008). Review of Arts Council England’s Regularly Funded Organizations Investment Strategy — Lessons Learned [annexes: Baroness G. McIntosh’s report and a communications review], London: ACE.
DCMS (2010). ‘Improving Efficiency and Transparency: DCMS Cuts quangos’, press release, 14 October 2010.
DCMS (2011a). Encouraging Involvement in Big Society: A Cultural and Sporting Perspective.
DCMS (2011b). Government Response to the Select Committee Report on Funding of Arts and Heritage.
Doustaly, C. (2007). ‘Les politiques de soutien à l’art en Angleterre depuis 1990: «exception britannique», dirigisme ou modèle hybride?’ LISA e-journal, 1: 6–32.
Doustaly, C. (2012). ‘English and French Arts and Heritage Policy in the 2000s: Converging Models or “Transient Symmetry”’, 7th International Conference on Cultural Policy Research, Barcelona, 9–12 July 2012.
Doustaly, C. and Gray, C. (2010). ‘Labour and the Arts: Managing Transformation?’ Observatoire de la société britannique, Université du Sud-Toulon-Var, 8: 319–338.
Dunleavy, P. and Margetts, H. (2010). ‘The Second Wave of Digital Era Governance’, American Political Science Association Conference, 4 September 2010, Washington, DC, 32 p. URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27684/.
Gray, C. (2011). ‘Museums, Galleries, Politics and Management’, Public Policy and Administration, 26(1): 46–61.
HC (2008). House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, Making Grants Efficiently in the Culture, Media and Sport Sector, Forty-Ninth Report of Session 2007–08.
HC (2011a). House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Funding of the Arts and Heritage, Third Report of Session 2010–11.
HC (2011b). House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee, Government and IT — ‘A Recipe for Rip-Offs’: Time for a New Approach. Further Report, Twentieth Report of Session 2010–12.
IFACCA (2012). URL: http://www.ifacca.org/jobs/2012/02/08/acting-executive-director-advocacy-communications.
Keaney, E., Bunting, C., et al. (2007). The Arts Debate: Summary and Analysis of Consultation Responses, London: ACE.
Margetts, H. (2009). ‘The Internet and Public Policy’, Policy & Internet, 1(1): 1–21.
McMaster, B. (2008). Supporting Excellence in the Arts: From Measurement to Judgement, London: DCMS.
Quest (2012). URL: http://www.grantmanagementsoftware.com/; http://www.quest.ie/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14&Itemid=277.
Taylor, A. (1997). ‘“Arm’s-length But Hands On”: Mapping the New Governance’, Public Administration, 75: 441–466.
Waksberg, A. and Aibar, E. (2007). ‘Towards a Network Government? A Critical Analysis of Current Assessment Methods for E-Government’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4656: 330–341.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Cécile Doustaly
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doustaly, C. (2013). Arts Council England in the 2000s: Towards Digital Era Governance?. In: Avril, E., Zumello, C. (eds) New Technology, Organizational Change and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137264237_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137264237_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44291-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-26423-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)