Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: Towards Organizational Democracy? Convergence and Divergence in Models of Economic and Political Governance

  • Chapter
New Technology, Organizational Change and Governance

  • 259 Accesses

Abstract

This study on organizational change begins with the idea that globalization and the development of the new information and communication technologies (ICTs) have favoured the structural convergence of organizations, resulting in the hegemonic dominance of business values and practices in virtually all types of organizations, notably political parties and public or semi-public organizations. So far, very few scholars have tried to make this convergence between business organization paradigms and those present in other types of organizations, notably political parties, semi-public bodies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), explicit, with the notable exception of Max Weber, who pointed out in his 1925 book Economy and Society the continuities of structure and practice deriving from the bureaucratic form present within all large-scale organizations (Weber, 1978), and Robert Michels, who highlighted in 1911, through his theory of the ‘Iron law of oligarchy’, the process of bureaucratization of political parties (Michels, 1915).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001). ‘Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues’, MIS Quarterly, 25(1): 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J.M. and Spreitzer, G.M. (2006). ‘The Interdisciplinary Career of a Popular Construct Used in Management: Empowerment in the Late 20th Century’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3): 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanov, A. (1980). Essays in Tektology: The General Science of Organization (translation George Gorelik), Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnes, B. (1996). Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organizational Dynamics, London: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarinha-Matos, L., Afsarmanesh, H., and Ollus, M. (eds.) (2005). Virtual Organizations: Systems and Practices, New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J.L.C. and McKinley, W. (1983). ‘Toward an Integration of Organization Research and Practice: A Contingency Study of Bureaucratic Control and Performance in Scientific Settings’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1): 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clippinger, J.H. (1999). ‘Order From the Bottom Up: Complex Adaptive Systems and Their Management’, in Clippinger, J.H. (ed.), The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.B. (1988). ‘The Empowerment Process. Integrating Theory and Practice’, Academy of Management Review, 13: 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. and Barlin, J. (eds.) (2007). The Handbook of Organizational Behavior, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidow, W.H. and Malone, M.S. (1992). The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century, New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.F. (2009). Managed by the Markets, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., et al. (2006). Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State and E-Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, W.M. and Burke, D.R. (2002). ‘Virtual Venturing and Entry Barriers: Redefining the Strategic Landscape’, SAM Advanced Management Journal, 66(4): 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, U.J. (1999). ‘The Virtual Web as a New Entrepreneurial Approach to Network Organizations’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 11(3): 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A.L. and Miles, S. (2001). ‘Developing a Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Management and Studies, 39(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauja, A. (2006). Enforcing Democracy? Towards a Regulatory Regime for the Implementation of Intra-Party Democracy, Democratic Audit of Australia 2006, Discussion Paper 14/06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R.K., Nixon, P., and Ward, S.J. (eds.) (2003). Political Parties and the Internet: Net Gain?, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R.K., Oates, S., Owen, D., and Gibson, R.K. (eds.) (2005). The Internet and Politics: Citizens, Voters and Activists, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R.K., Römmele, A., and Ward, S.J. (eds.) (2004). Electronic Democracy: Political Organizations, Mobilization and Participation Online, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R.K. and Ward, S.J. (2009). ‘European Political Organization on the Internet. Mobilization, Participation, and Change’, in Chadwick, A. and Howard, P.N. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, London: Routledge, pp. 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J.D. (1994). ‘Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work-Family Issues’, Academy of Management Journal, 37(2): 350–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. and Baron, R.A. (2003). Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, R. and Metes, G. (1995). Going Virtual: Moving Your Organization into the 21st Century, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.H. and Tolbert, P.S. (2008). Organization: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. and Brown, D.R. (1996). An Experiential Approach to Organization Development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, M. (2009). The Myth of Digital Democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, K. (2009). Liquidated. An Ethnography of Wall Street, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P.N. (2006). New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, R. (1996). Manufacturing the Employee: Management Knowledge from the 9th to the 21st Centuries, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. (2005). Adopting Party Law (Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical Perspectives Series), Washington, DC: NDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation, New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E., and Gibson, C.B. (2004). ‘The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction’, Academy of Management Journal, 47(2): 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E.E., Mohrman, S.A., and Benson, G. (2001). Organizing for High Performance: Employee Involvement, TQM, Reengineering, and Knowledge Management in the Fortune 1000, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. and Koh, J. (2001). ‘Is Empowerment Really a New Concept?’ International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4): 684–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Marshment, J. (2001). Political Marketing and British Political Parties: The Party’s Just Begun, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Marshment, J. (2004). The Political Marketing Revolution, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, N.D., Travers, C., Ackers, P., and Wilkinson, A. (2002). ‘The Meaning of Empowerment. The Interdisciplinary Etymology of a New Management Concept’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(3): 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipnack, J. and Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology, New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, R.R. (1996). The Collapse of the American Management Mystique, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, R.R. and Spender, J.-C. (2011). Confronting Managerialism: How the Business Elite and Their Schools Threw Our Lives Out of Balance, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, P. (1995). Democratic Governance, New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, J., Duberley, J., and Johnson, P. (2007). Organization Theory: Challenges and Perspectives, Harlow: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M., O’Brien, G., and Ramondt, J. (2001). ‘Finding an Alternative to Bureaucratic Models of Organization in the Public Sector’, Public Money & Management, 21(1): 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (translation Eden Paul and Cedar Paul), New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (1998). Strategic Management, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, P.K. and Ungson, G.R. (2003). ‘Reassessing the Limits of Structural Empowerment: Organizational Constitution and Trust as Controls’, Academy of Management Review, 28: 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, B. and Bhaskar, A.U. (2010). ‘Empowerment: A Necessary Attribute of a Learning Organization?’ Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 1(2): 48–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T.R. (1978). People in Organizations. Understanding Their Behavior, Kogakusha: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organization, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1988). Riding the Waves of Change, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S.A. and McManus, D.J. (2002). ‘Information Infrastructure Centrality in the Agile Organization’, Information Systems Management, 19(4): 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2004). Building Political Parties: Reforming Legal Regulations and Internal Rules, Stockholm: IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, L. (2001). ‘Understanding Virtual Organizations’, Information Systems Control Journal, 6: 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G. (1996). The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pranic, L. and Roehl, W. S. (2012). ‘Rethinking Service Recovery: a Customer Empowerment (CE) Perspective’, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(2): 242–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996). ‘The New Governance: Governing without Government’, Political Studies, 44(4): 652–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S.P. (1987). Organization Theory: Structure Design and Applications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J.N. and Czempiel, E.O. (eds.) (1992). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scammell, M. (1999). ‘Political Marketing: Lessons for Political Science’, Political Studies, XLVII: 718–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scammell, M. (2003). ‘Citizen Consumers: Towards a New Marketing of Politics?’ in Corner, J. and Pels, D. (eds.), Media and the Restyling of Politics: Consumerism, Celebrity, Cynicism, London: Sage, pp. 117–136.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S.E. (1996). Parties and Their Members, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S.E. (2005). Implementing Intra-Party Democracy, Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical Perspectives Series, Washington, DC: NDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, P.M. (2004). Democracy Online. The Prospects for Renewal through the Internet, New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations, New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1979). ‘Rational Decision-Making in Business Organizations’, American Economic Review, 69: 495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1995). ‘Rationality in Political Behavior’, Political Psychology, 16: 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. (1995). ‘Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation’, Academy of Management Journal, 38(5): 1442–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. (2007). ‘Taking Stock: A Review of More than Twenty Years of Research on Empowerment at Work’, in Cooper, C., and Barlin, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F.W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management, New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuten, T.L. (2010). Enterprise 2.0: How Technology, Ecommerce, and Web 2.0 Are Transforming Business Virtually, London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V.H. and Jago, A.G. (1988). The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washbourne, N. (2001). ‘Information Technology and New Forms of Organising? Translocalism and Networks in Friends of the Earth’, in Webster, F. (ed.), Culture and Politics in the Information Age: A New Politics?, London: Routledge, pp. 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology (translation Guenther Roth and Claus Wittish), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. (2001). Making Sense of the Organization, Oxford: Blackwell Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E., and Quinn, R.E. (1999). ‘Organizational Change and Development’, Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W.B. (1999). ‘Structure-Driven Strategy and Virtual Organization Design’, Business Horizons, 42(2): 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Emmanuelle Avril
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine Zumello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, France

    Emmanuelle Avril (Professor of Contemporary British Politics and Society) & Christine Zumello (Professor of Contemporary American Politics and Society) (Professor of Contemporary British Politics and Society) &  (Professor of Contemporary American Politics and Society)

Copyright information

© 2013 Emmanuelle Avril and Christine Zumello

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avril, E., Zumello, C. (2013). Introduction: Towards Organizational Democracy? Convergence and Divergence in Models of Economic and Political Governance. In: Avril, E., Zumello, C. (eds) New Technology, Organizational Change and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137264237_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation