Abstract
The 1970s artists were not the first among those of the twentieth century to engage the cinematic by exploring tensions between mediums. As noted, the process under discussion is not solely to incorporate film images into new work or to juxtapose one medium with another. Rather, the method is to create an oppositional tension between forms. Joseph Cornell, for example, put film as a cultural product into tension with stillness, alluding to the status of photography in the framed confines of his memory boxes. And while the Edison Company’s Annabelle, Serpentine Dance (1894) was a “naïve” work, the filmmakers nonetheless set still photography into tension with the new technology in which they worked. Andy Warhol’s films too provide a major example. In his fixed-frame film Empire (1964), Warhol questioned the movement potential of the image by presenting a timed “portrait” of the Empire State Building. In this chapter I will consider the methods employed by the above-mentioned earlier works as a way of introducing Jack Goldstein’s film loop The Jump (1978). The latter is a work that similarly addresses the question of film movement, and the film image, now in tension with drawing. In The Jump, the whole body in movement is foregrounded, and then distilled, in the contemplation of the “moving picture” itself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Jodi Hauptman, Joseph Cornell: Stargazing in the Cinema (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1999), 122.
Annette Michelson, “‘Where Is Your Rupture?’: Mass Culture and the Gesamtkunstwerk,” October 56, High/Low: Art and Mass Culture (Spring 1991), 60.
Stephen Koch reports that during the filming of Empire, Warhol exclaimed, “The Empire State Building is a star!” Stargazer: Andy Warhol’s World and His Films (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1973), 60.
Warhol employed this method when shooting many of his silent films. P. Adams Sitney explains, “Warhol broke the most severe theoretical taboo when he made films that challenged the viewer’s ability to endure sameness. He often insisted that each film be shown as 16 frames per second although it had been shot at 24.” Visionary Film: The American Avant-Garde 1943–2000 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 351.
Stanley Cavell, The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), 23.
Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 1: The Movement Image, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986).
Susan Sontag, “Fascinating Fascism,” in A Susan Sontag Reader (New York: Vintage Books, 1983), 305–25.
Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 2: The Time Image, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), 105.
Copyright information
© 2012 Vera Dika
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cornell, J., Company, E., Warhol, A., Goldstein, J. (2012). Stillness/Movement. In: The (Moving) Pictures Generation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137118516_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137118516_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34429-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-11851-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)