Skip to main content

Creating the Character, Culture, and Craft of Engagement

  • Chapter
The Engaged Campus

Part of the book series: Community Engagement in Higher Education ((CEHE))

  • 116 Accesses

Abstract

Because faculty members and staff create majors and minors in service-learning, public engagement, civic work, and related areas, it is important that they understand community engagement in context, that is, how it works on specific campuses, depending on the organizational culture, norms, mission and, of course, relationships, both within and outside the institution. As Furco and Miller (2009) document, there are multiple measures of the extent to which community engagement has been institutionalized on campuses. Just as important, however, is the way in which community engagement has been implemented and how it is characterized and understood on campus. In this chapter, I report on community engagement at Bryant University, an organization with a long history and strong tradition as a business school. I examine how service-learning was “branded” and conceptualized in our new sociology major, illustrating how we developed the character, culture, and craft of engagement. Finally, I propose some lessons we learned that might provide guidance to other campuses considering developing a service-learning major within a discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brownell, J. E., & Swaner, L. E. (2010). Five high-impact practices: Research on learning outcomes, completion, and quality. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butin, D. W. (2010a). “Can I major in service learning?” An empirical analysis of certificates, minors, and majors. Journal of College & Character, 11, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butin, D. W. (2010b). Service-learning in theory and practice: The future of community engagement in higher education. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Callero, P. L. (2009). The Myth of individualism: How social forces shape our lives. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, S. A. & Pawlowski, D. R. (2007). Assessing institutional support for service- learning: A case study of organizational sense-making. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cone, D., & Payne, P. (2001). When campus and community collide: Campuscommunity partnerships from a community perspective. The Journal of Public Affairs, 6, 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraleigh, M., Ciliberto, D., & Enos, S. (2009). Sociology program self-assessment. Smithfield, RI: Bryant University Sociology Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furco, A., & Miller, W. (2009). Issues in benchmarking and assessing institutional engagement. New Directions in Higher Education, 147, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marullo, S., Moayedi, R., & Cooke, D. (2009). C. Wright Mills’s friendly critique of service learning and an innovative response: Cross-institutional collaborations for community-based research. Teaching Sociology, 37, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, K., & Enos, S. (2002). Building deeper civic relationships and new and improved citizens. Journal of Public Affairs, 6, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Institutional Planning and Research. (n.d.). Bryant University.Data Set 2009–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seider, S. C., Gillmor, S. C., & Rabinowitz, S. A. (2011). The impact of community service learning upon the worldviews of business majors versus non-business majors at an American university. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 458–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, K. J. (1999). Sociology and service-learning: A critical look. In J. Ostrow, G. Hesser, & Enos S. (Eds.), Cultivating the sociological imagination: Concepts and models for service-learning in sociology (pp. 29–38 ). Washington, D.C.: American Association of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suskind, R. (1998). A hope in the unseen: An American odyssey from the inner city to the Ivy League. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenured Sociology Faculty. ( 2006, January 16). Proposal for a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology. Submitted to the Curriculum Committee, Bryant University. Smithfield, RI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Dan W. Butin Scott Seider

Copyright information

© 2012 Dan W. Butin and Scott Seider

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Enos, S.L. (2012). Creating the Character, Culture, and Craft of Engagement. In: Butin, D.W., Seider, S. (eds) The Engaged Campus. Community Engagement in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137113283_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics