Governance as Political Theory



The concept of governance has become very fashionable over the past several decades, and indeed has become one of the most commonly used terms in political science. One French scholar, for example, has referred to this term as a “fetish.” Further, the term has become widely used in the discussions and publications of international organizations, especially those responsible for improving the lives of people around the world living with poverty and oppression. The concept of governance also has been used in relation to the management of organizations in the private sector, with interest in corporate governance becoming all the more pervasive after major debacles in firms such as Enron and Lehmann Brothers.


Corporate Governance Political Science Political Theory Good Governance Informal Institution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bay, C. 1967. The Structure of Freedom. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, A., and A. George. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Besancon, M. 2006. Good Governance Rankings: The Art of Measurement. Boston, MA: World Peace Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Blais, A., D. Blake, and S. Dion. 1993. “Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breton, A. 2007. The Economics of Transparency in Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Brodansky, D. 1999. “The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law.” American Journal of International Law, 93(3): 596–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collier, David, and Steven Levitsky. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics, 49(3): 430–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Considine, M. 2002. “The End of the Line?: Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships and Joined-Up Services.” Governance, 15(1): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duit, A., and V. Galaz. 2008. “Governance and Complexity: Emerging Issues for Governance Theory.” Governance, 21(3): 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emmerson, D. K. 1995. “Singapore and the ‘Asian Values’ Debate.” Journal of Democracy, 6(4): 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frohlich, N., and J. Oppenheimer. 2006. “Skating on Thin Ice: Cracks in the Public Choice Foundation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18(3): 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardin, G. 1977. Managing the Commons. San Francisco, CA: W. W. Freeman.Google Scholar
  13. Hay, C. 1996. “Structure and Agency.” In D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Helmke, G., and S. Levitsky. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics.” Perspectives on Politics, 2(4): 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, But How?: Types of Multi-level Governance.” American Political Science Review, 97(2): 233–243.Google Scholar
  16. John, P., and A. Cole. 1999. “Political Leadership in the New Urban Governance.” Local Government Studies, 25(4): 98–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kakkinen, B. C. 2004. “New Governance in Legal Thought and the World.” Minnesota Law Review 89, 471–504.Google Scholar
  18. Klijn, E. H., and J. Koppenjan. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Koehler-Koch, B., and B. Rittberger. 2006. “The Governance Turn in EU Studies.” Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(1): 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lam, W. F. 1998. Governing Irrigation Systems in Nepal: Institutions, Infrastructure and Collective Action. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lane, H. 1994. “Structural Functionalism Reconsidered: A Proposed Research Agenda.” Comparative Politics, 26(4): 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mayntz, R. 2004. “Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena.” Philosophy of Social Sciences, 34(2): 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morth, U. 2004. Soft Law in the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  24. Niemann, M. 2007. “War Making and State Making in Central Africa.” Africa Today, 53(3): 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution on Institutions of Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. —. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Page, E. C., and B. Jenkins. 2005. Policy Bureaucracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peters, B. G. 1987. “Politicians and Bureaucrats in the Politics of Policymaking.” In J. E. Lane (ed.), Bureaucracy and Public Choice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. —. 2003. The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models, 2nd ed. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  30. —. 2005. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, 2nd ed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  31. Peters, B. G., J. Pierre, E. Sorenson, and J. Torfing. 2011. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pontussen, J. 1995. “From Comparative Public Policy to Political Economy: Putting Political Institutions in their Place and Taking Institutions Seriously.” Comparative Political Studies, 28(1): 117–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. “The New Governance: Governance without Government.” Political Studies, 44(4): 652–667,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Risse, T., and U. Lehmkuhl. 2010. Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Rose, R. 1974. The Problem of Party Government. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenau, J. N., and E. O. Czempiel. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rothstein, B., and J. Toerell. 2008 “What is the Quality of Governance: A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions.” Governance 21, 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sabatier, P. A. 2007. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sartori, G. 1971. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64, 1033–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. —. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scharpf, F. W. 1988. “The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration.” Public Administration 66, 239–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. —. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centred Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  43. Seawright, J. 2010. “Regression-based Inference: A Case Study of Failed Causal Assessment.” In H. E. Brady and D. Collier (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry, 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, B. C. 2003. Understanding Third World Politics: Theories of Political Change and Development. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Trondal, J. 2007. “The Public Administration Turn in Integration Research.” Journal of European Public Policy 14, 960–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Keersbergen, K., and F. Van Waarden. 2004. “Governance as a Bridge Between Disciplines: Cross-disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy.” European Journal of Political Research 43, 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wettestad, J. 2001. “Designing Effective Environmental Regimes: The Conditional Keys.” Global Governance 7, 317–341.Google Scholar
  48. Wildavsky, A. 1966. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jianxing Yu and Sujian Guo 2012

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations