Skip to main content

Reality Remixed: Neomedieval Princess Culture in Disney’s Enchanted

  • Chapter
The Disney Middle Ages

Part of the book series: The New Middle Ages ((TNMA))

Abstract

“The real world and the animated world collide.” This tagline, used to market the 2007 Disney film Enchanted, assumes an audience that knows what is meant by “real world” and “animated world.” In particular, the animated world implied by the tagline is one defined by a history of Disney fairy-tale tropes, which invites potential viewers to enjoy its “collision” with reality. The slogan for this mixed animated and live-action Princess narrative suggests a subversive approach to the Disney canon, one that promises to grapple with the disjuncture between the medievalisms of its fairy-tale realms and the trappings of modern life. The result, however, is a film that refuses any historical anchor for Disney’s fairy-tale ethos, fashioning instead what Carol Robinson and Pamela Clements call “neomedievalism,” in order to insist upon the pervasive relevance of that ethos in the contemporary world.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Carol Robinson and Pamela Clements,“Living with Neornedievalisms,” Defining Medievalism(s) II, ed. Karl Fugelso (Cambridge: Brewer, 2009): 55–75. As Robinson and Clements note, this use of “neomedieval-ism” is markedly different from that explored

    Google Scholar 

  2. by Bruce Holsinger in Neomedievalism, Neoconservatism, and the War on Terror (Chicago: Prickly Paradigm, 2007). I intend no reference to Holsinger’s use of the term.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henry Jenkins, Convergence Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. For analysis of the differences in Princess culture during these eras, see Rebecca-Anne Do Rozario, “The Princess and the Magic Kingdom: Beyond Nostalgia, the Function of the Disney Princess,” Women’s Studies in Communication 27.1 (2004): 34–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carolyn Dinshaw, Getting Medieval: Sexualities and Communities, Pre- and Postmodern (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999), 185–86. Dinshaw also explores the homophobic and homoerotic connotations of the medi-eval in this scene. Although beyond the scope of this essay, it is worth noting that Enchanted alsoflirts with such implications in its character-izations of Edward and Nathaniel. They each serve as the butt of homoerotic jokes, including several that play with the idea of a man desiring or seeking a “prince.”

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Henry Jenkins, Textual Poachers (New York: Routledge, 1992), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See also Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Steven Rendall (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jason Sperb, “Reassuring Convergence: Online Fandom, Race, and Disney’s Notorious Song of the South,” Cinema Journal 49.4 (2010): 25–45, at 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chuck Tryon, Reinventing Cinema (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2009), 151.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Susan Aronstein and Robert Torry, “Magic Happens: Re-Enchanting Disney Adults,” Weber: The Contemporary West 26.2 (2010): 41–54, at 49.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kathleen Coyne Kelly and Tison Pugh, “Introduction: Queer History, Cinematic Medievalism, and the Impossibilty of Sexuality,” Queer Movie Medievalisms, ed. Kathleen Coyne Kelly and Tison Pugh (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009), 1–17, at 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jack Zipes, Fairy Tales and the Art of Subversion, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2006), 193 and 203.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helen Cooper, The English Romance in Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 222.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cory Grewell, “Neomedievalism: An Eleventh Little Middle Ages?” Defining Neomedievalism(s), ed. Karl Fugelso (Cambridge: Brewer, 2010), 34–43, at 40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jacqueline Rose, The Case of Peter Pan, or, The Impossibility of Children’s Literature (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993). 9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Francesca Coppa, “An Editing Room of One’s Own: Vidding as Women’s Work,” Camera Obscura 26.2 (2011): 123–30, at 124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Tison Pugh Susan Aronstein

Copyright information

© 2012 Tison Pugh and Susan Aronstein

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cecire, M.S. (2012). Reality Remixed: Neomedieval Princess Culture in Disney’s Enchanted. In: Pugh, T., Aronstein, S. (eds) The Disney Middle Ages. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137066923_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics