Skip to main content

The Question of Preventive War

The March toward Prevention

  • Chapter
The Iraq War
  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

Events of the past few decades have consistently worked to modify our conception of international justice, international ethics, political violence, terrorism, and global warfare. The early years of the twenty-first century further challenged previously held notions, largely due to 9/11, the so-called War on Terror, and the ensuing Iraq war. Indeed, the second Iraq war (the Gulf War being the first) altered our understanding of many of these issues. In this chapter, I consider the impact that the war on Iraq has had on the notion of preventive war. While the Iraq war itself did not contribute to the invention or formulation of this controversial doctrine, it does serve as the first example of a full-scale preventive war since the United States adopted the policy as part of its official national defense strategy. In waging the Iraq war, the George W. Bush administration demonstrated significant departure from the legalist paradigm that had regulated international war convention throughout the past six decades. Thus the Iraq war resuscitated a long-standing debate that focused primarily on the need to prohibit (or severely limit) preventive war measures on legal, moral, or strategic grounds. Of course, the doctrine also has its fair share of proponents, particularly in the realist political tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. These alternative terms (in the order they appear in the body of the text) are used by Steven P. Lee, Andrew Fiala, George P. Shultz, Michael Walzer, and various Bush administration officials more broadly. See the following essays: Steven P. Lee, “Preventive Intervention,” in Intervention, Terrorism, and Torture: Contemporary Challenges to Just War Theory, ed. Steven P. Lee (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007), 119–33;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrew Fiala, “The Preemptive War Doctrine,” in The Just War Myth: The Moral Illusions of War (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008), 79–97; George P. Shultz, “Hot Preemption,” Hoover Digest, last modified May 28, 2002, http://www.hoover.org/publications/digest/4484486.html;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Walzer, “Anticipations,” in Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 3rd ed. (New York: Basic Books, 2000), 74–85. For Bush administration speeches and policy papers, see accompanying sources in this chapter.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Some have challenged the claim that preventive war is incompatible with JWT. Whitley Kaufman argues that JWT is not incompatible with preventive war per se, but that use of preventive war in the case of Iraq is unjustifiable because a preventive war may only be authorized by the Security Council; thus, it fails the jus ad bellum condition of legitimate authority (Kaufman’s account of legitimate authority is extended to the United Nations). See Whitley Kaufman, “What’s Wrong with Preventive War? The Moral and Legal Basis for the Preventive Use of Force,” Ethics and International Affairs 19, no. 3 (2005): 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. In its War on Terror since 9/11, the United States has not only invaded and occupied Iraq and Afghanistan, but has also sent ground troops to the Philippines, Yemen, Indonesia, and Georgia, to name but a few places. See Neta Crawford, “The Justice of Preemption and Preventive War Doctrines,” in Just War Theory: A Reappraisal, ed. Mark Evans (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. George W. Bush, “President Bush Delivers Graduation Speech at West Point,” last modified June 1, 2002, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/06/20020601–3.html.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Condoleezza Rice, “Dr. Condoleezza Rice Discusses President’s National Security Strategy,” last modified October 1, 2002, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021001–6.html.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Steven P. Lee, “A Moral Critique of the Cosmopolitan Institutional Proposal,” Ethics and International Affairs 19, no. 2 (2005): 105–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. John Hammond, “The Bush Doctrine, Preventive War, and International Law,” The Philosophical Forum 36, no.1 (Spring 2005): 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. While Neta Crawford introduces four useful conditions on the preemptive use of force in self-defense, she argues for a blanket prohibition against the preventive use of force. See Neta Crawford, “The Slippery Slope to Preventive War,” Ethics and International Affairs 17, no. 1 (2003): 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Michael Walzer, Arguing about War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004), 147.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miriam Sapiro, “Iraq: The Shifting Sands of Preemptive Self-Defense,” in The Morality of War: Classical and Contemporary Readings, eds. Larry May, Eric Rovie, and Steve Viner (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2006), 397.

    Google Scholar 

  13. David Luban, “Preventive War,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 32, no. 3 (2004): 228–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicholas Fotion, War and Ethics (London: Continuum, 2007), 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. This seems to be the view of several contemporary thinkers such as David Luban, Whitley Kaufman, Allen Buchanan, and Robert O. Keohane. See Luban, “Preventive War,” 209–10; Kaufman, “What’s Wrong with Preventive War?,” 23–24; Allen Buchanan and Robert O. Keohane, “The Preventive Use of Force: A Cosmopolitan Institutional Proposal,” Ethics and International Affairs 18, no.1 (2004), 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kofi Annan, “Address to the United Nations General Assembly,” last modified September 23, 2003, http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/58/statements/sg2eng030923.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Noam Chomsky, Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance (New York: Henry Holt, 2004), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Additionally, Eisenhower went on to associate the doctrine with Hitler’s strategy (and oddly enough the Nazi party is the kind of example many cite when defending any kind of provision for preventive war). Eisenhower, in fact, rejected the doctrine entirely: “A preventive war, to my mind, is an impossibility today. How could you have one if one of its features would be several cities lying in ruins, several cities where many, many thousands of people would be dead and injured and mangled, the transportation systems destroyed, sanitation implements and systems all gone? That isn’t preventive war; that is war.” For the full interview, see Dwight Eisenhower, “The President’s News Conference of August 11th, 1954,” accessed July 20, 2008, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/print.php?pid=9977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Bassam Romaya

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Romaya, B. (2012). The Question of Preventive War. In: The Iraq War. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137055309_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics