Advertisement

Arts-Based Research: Data Are Constructed, Not Found

Chapter

Abstract

“Arts-based research” is a vague term that has gained prominence since the last decade of the twentieth century. Nevertheless, the social sciences have implicitly practiced arts-based methods for well over one hundred years. Arguably, arts-based research theoretically began once social science accepted the camera as a source for producing valid social science data. Eadweard Muybridge’s 1878 studies of a galloping horse—used to settle a bet—could be a formal date for the birth of the field (Solnit, 2003). In the mid-twentieth century, anthropologists—often noting poetic forms of discourse in the people they were studying—wrote poems in response to their field experiences and personal lives, but these were not considered to be part of their disciplined work (Cahnmann-Taylor & Siegesmund, 2008). In the last two decades of the twentieth century the barriers in the use of poetry to record and report anthropological findings continued to dissolve (Cahnmann, 2003).

Keywords

Journal Entry Qualitative Reasoning Visual Journal Social Science Practice Anthropological Finding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1982). Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barone, T. (1992). On the demise of subjectivity in educational inquiry. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barone, T. (2001). Touching eternity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barone, T. (2008). How arts-based research can change minds. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 28–49). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts based research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (2007). Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry. London, England: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  7. Bowie, A. (2003). Aesthetics and subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche (2nd ed.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bresler, L. (2006). Toward connectedness: Aesthetically based research. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 52–69.Google Scholar
  9. Cahnmann, M. (2003). The craft, practice, and possibility of poetry in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cahnmann-Taylor, M., & Siegesmund, R. (Eds.). (2008). Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. (1994). National standards for arts education. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, J. (1998). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967)Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, J. (1988). Letter to a Japanese friend. In D. Wood & R. Bernasconi (Eds.), Derrida and différance (pp. 1–5). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1989). Art as experience. In J. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 10, pp. 1–400). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
  16. Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Eisner, E. W. (1994). Cognition and curriculum reconsidered (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Elderfield, J. (1997). Leaving Ocean Park. In J. Livingston (Ed.), The art of Richard Diebenkorn (pp. 107–115). Berkeley, CA: Whitney Museum of American Art & University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Elkins, J. (2009). Artists with PhDs: On the new doctoral degree in studio art. Washington, DC: New Academia Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Ewald, W., & Lightfoot, A. (2001). I wanna take me a picture: Teaching photography and writing to children. Boston, MA: Center for Documentary Studies and Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Flax, J. (1990). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In Linda J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism (pp. 39–62). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. (1985). The history of sexuality: Vol. 2. The use of pleasure (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1984)Google Scholar
  24. Foucault, M. (1988). The history of sexuality: Vol. 3. The care of the self (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1985)Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1997a). The ethics of concern of the self as a practice in freedom (R. Fornet-Betancourt, H. Becker, & A. Gomez-Muller, Interviewers; P. Aranov & D. McGrawth, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 281–301). New York, NY: New Press. (Interview conducted in 1984)Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1997b). Michel Foucault: An interview with Stephen Riggins. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 122–133). New York, NY: New Press. (Interview conducted in 1982)Google Scholar
  27. Geertz, C. (2000). Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pressr.Google Scholar
  28. Greene, M. (2001). Thinking of things as if they could be otherwise: The arts and intimation of a better social order. In M. Green, Variations on a blue guitar: The Lincoln Center Institute lectures on aesthetic education (pp. 116–121). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. (Lecture given in 1997)Google Scholar
  29. Hafeli, M. (2008). I know a lot of things that you don’t. You wanna hear some? Art Education, 61(2), 59–69.Google Scholar
  30. Hankins, K. (2003). Teaching through the storm: A journal of hope. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  32. Hickman, R. (2007). Visual art as a vehicle for educational research. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 26(3), 314–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hine, L. (1908–1924). National Child Labor Committee collection [photographs]. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  34. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936)Google Scholar
  35. Irwin, R., & Springgay, S. (2008). A/r/tography as practice-based research. In M. Cahnmann & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 103–124). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Kan, K. H. (2007). A story told visually: The Singapore secondary art style. Arts & Learning Research Journal, 23(1), 135–156.Google Scholar
  37. Kant, I. (1929). Critique of pure reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: St. Martin’s. (Original work published 1781)Google Scholar
  38. Knowles, J. G., Promislow, S., & Cole, A. L. (Eds.). (2004). Provoked by art: Theorizing arts-informed research. Halifax, Nova Scotia & Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Backalong Books & Centre for Arts-Informed Research.Google Scholar
  39. Lajevic, L., & Springgay, S. (2008). A/r/tography as an ethics of embodiment: Visual journals in preservice education. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(1), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Leavy, P. (2008). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lowenfeld, V. (1947). Creative and mental growth. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  45. McNiff, S. (1998). Art-based research. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  46. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  47. Moore, M., & Prain, L. (2009). Yarn bombing: The art of crochet and knit graffiti. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Arsenal Pulp Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mulligan, K., & Correia, F. (2008). Facts. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/facts.Google Scholar
  49. O’Donoghue, D. (2009). Are we asking the wrong questions in arts-based research? Studies in Art Education, 50(4), 352–368.Google Scholar
  50. Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity—one’s own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–21.Google Scholar
  51. Powell, K., & Lajevic, L. (2011). Emergent places in pre-service art teaching: Lived curriculum, relationality, and embodied knowledge. Studies in Art Education, 53(1), 35–52.Google Scholar
  52. Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics (S. Corcoran, Trans.). London, England; New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  53. Riddett-Moore, K. (2009). Encouraging empathy through aesthetic engagement: An art lesson in living compositions. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 10(Portrayal 2), 1–22. Retrieved November 1, 2009, from http://www.ijea.org/v10p2.Google Scholar
  54. Rolling, J. H., Jr. (2010). A paradigm analysis of arts-based research and implica¬tions for education. Studies in Art Education, 51(2), 102–114.Google Scholar
  55. Sameshima, P. (2007). Seeing red: A pedagogy of parallax. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
  56. Siegesmund, R. (2005). Teaching qualitative reasoning: Portraits of practice. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(1), 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, C. (2011). Enacting others: Politics of identity in Eleanor Antin, Nikki S. Lee, Adrian Piper, and Anna Deavere Smith. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Solnit, R. (2003). River of shadows: Eadweard Muybridge and the technological wild west. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  59. Springgay, S., Irwin, R., & Kind, S. W. (2005). A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 897–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., Leggo, C., & Gouzouasis, P. (Eds.). (2008). Being with a/r/tography. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (2000). Inquiry among the ruins. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the Ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and method in education (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Sullivan, G. (2006). Research acts in art practice. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 19–35.Google Scholar
  63. Sullivan, G. (2010). Art practice as research: Inquiry in visual arts (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. White, B. (2011). Embodied aesthetics, evocative art criticism: Aesthetically based research. Studies in Art Education, 52(2), 142–154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sheri R. Klein 2012

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations