Abstract
Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones occupies a curious position in the playwright’s extensive catalog. Both wildly popular as well as theatrically sophisticated, it provided the Provincetown Players their first and only runaway commercial hit in its initial run, beginning in November of 1920. O’Neill himself ranked it among his best work,1 and its adaptation to film and opera, both in 1933, speaks to its commercial and narrative appeal to audiences and artists. Since its debut, O’Neill scholars have also approached the text in significant and intriguing ways, noting its debt to continental expressionism,2 its use of Jungian archetypes and Freudian psychology,3 and its appropriation and portrayal of race.4 Yet in addition to its complex philosophical and cultural underpinnings, The Emperor Jones is also profoundly theatrical and thrilling, a play that exults in the Aristotelian sense of spectacle. Fear and terror drive the story, forcing the audience to join Brutus Jones on his journey through his personal and collective past. This essay will look specifically at how O’Neill uses fear and terror in The Emperor Jones, focusing on the ghost characters and the medium of the forest, the supernatural place that links Brutus Jones’s external and interior realities. O’Neill’s use of ghosts and the haunted forest reveals both his debt to the European theatrical tradition of ghost plays, which originated in ancient Athens, as well as his use of the forest as the locus of fear and anxiety found in the early American literary tradition of the Puritans. Through ghosts and the forest, O’Neill manages to create a hybrid place in the play. Though set in the West Indies, a location neither American, nor European, nor African, the setting of The Emperor Jones somehow evokes and integrates all three.
This thing [the ghost] that looks at us, that concerns us, comes to defy semantics as much as ontology, psychoanalysis as much as philosophy.
— Jacques Derrida
I ain’t ’fraid of no ghosts!
— Ray Parker Jr.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Andes, Anna. “Haunted by Ghosts of Other Mother’s Sons: Surrogation and Eugenics in Angela Gimke’s Rachel and Georgina Douglas Jonson’s Safe.” Theatre and Ghosts Conference. University of York, York. 2 July 2011. Lecture.
Berlin, Normand. Eugene O’Neill. New York: Grove, 1982. Print.
Bigsby, C. W. E. A Critical Introduction to Twentieth-Century American Drama, Volume 1:1900–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1982. Print.
Bogard, Travis, and Jackson R Bryer, eds. Selected Letters of Eugene O’Neill. New Haven: Yale UP, 1988. Print.
Chabrowe, Leonard. Ritual and Pathos — The Theater of Eugene O’Neill. Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 1976. Print.
Edgar, David. How Plays Work. London: Hern, 2009. Print.
Felton, D. Haunted Greece and Rome: Ghost Stories from Classical Antiquity. Austin: U of Texas P, 1999. Print.
Floyd, Virginia. The Plays of Eugene O’Neill: A New Assessment. New York: Ungar, 1985. Print.
Frenz, Horst. Eugene O’Neill. New York: Ungar, 1971. Print.
Hooti, Noorbakhsh, and Nasser Maleki. “Terror and Ambivalence of the Human Soul in O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones, and The Hairy Ape.” Global Journal of the Humanities 7. 1–2 (2008): 9–18. Web. 12 Aug. 2011. http://www.globaljournalseries.com/index/index.php/gjh/article/viewfile/188/pdf.
Manuel, Carme. “A Ghost in the Expressionist Jungle of O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones.” African American Review 39. 1–2 (2005): 67–85.
O’Neill, Eugene. The Emperor Jones. Complete Plays 1913–1920. Ed. Travis Bogard. New York: Library of America, 1988. 1029–61. Print.
O’Neill, Eugene. Long Day’s Journey into Night. New Haven: Yale UP, 1956.
Poe, Edgar Allan. The Unabridged Edgar Allan Poe. Ed. Tarn Mossman. Philadelphia: Running, 1983. Print.
Radcliffe, Ann. “On the Supernatural in Poetry.” Gothic Readings: The First Wave 1764–1840. Ed. Rictor Norton. London: Leicester UP, 2000. 311–16. Print.
Salisbury, Neal, ed. The Sovereignty and Goodness of God, Together with the Faithfulness of His Promises Displayed, Being a Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson and Related Documents. Boston: Bedford, 1997. Print.
Slotkin, Richard. Regeneration through Violence: The Mythology of the American Frontier, 1600–1860. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 1973. Print.
Smith, Susan H. “The Emperor Jones and National Trauma.” Modern Drama 52. 1 (2009): 57–72. Print.
Steen, Shannon, “Melancholy Bodies: Racial Subjectivity and Whiteness in O’Neill’s ‘Emperor Jones.’” Theatre Journal 52. 3 (2000): 339–59. Print.
Tornqvist, Egil. A Drama of Souls: Studies in O’Neill’s Super-naturalistic Techniques. New Haven: Yale UP, 1969. Print.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Michael Y. Bennett and Benjamin D. Carson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Streufert, P.D. (2012). “Ain’T Nothin’ Dere But De Trees!”. In: Bennett, M.Y., Carson, B.D. (eds) Eugene O’Neill’s One-Act Plays. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137043931_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137043931_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34235-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-04393-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)