Abstract
Morality is about the obligations of the individual to the social group, and moralists over the ages have been keen to clarify what those individual obligations are. Philosophers and theologians have used the tools of systematic thought to consider how people should act and how we should judge the actions of others. I showed in Chapter 2 how some of their ideas can be used as a way to understand the content of television programmes, but one limitation in the philosophical tradition is that morality is treated as a matter primarily for the individual – if a person’s way of thinking or being is right, the goodness of their conduct will follow. The philosophical tradition pays great attention to the cognitive aspect of morality; thinking precedes action and makes it what it is. Sociology turns the emphasis around so that morality refers to the behavioural standards of a society and derives from seeing what people normally do in that society rather than from thinking about what an individual might do.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Tim Dant
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dant, T. (2012). Sociology and the Moral Order. In: Television and the Moral Imaginary. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035554_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035554_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31362-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03555-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)