Abstract
This chapter focuses on the city of São Paulo, Brazil and examines the ways in which irregular and illegal growth, characteristic of much of the city, have influenced the collective action of social movements of the urban poor. Based on a year of ethnographic fieldwork with the Alliance of Housing Movements in São Paulo, or UMM, the chapter describes how, during the 20th century, São Paulo grew as a socially segregated city due to calculated neglect on the part of the municipal authorities. Highlighting the city’s socio-spatial inequality, the degradation of the central districts and the widespread irregularity, it illustrates how these factors have both negatively affected the urban poor and provided a catalyst for social mobilization. In a recent examination of urban citizenship in São Paulo, Holston (2008) has shown how the irregularity of settlements on the peripheries of the city stimulated homeowners in lower-income neighbourhoods to use the law to assert their claims to land and to regularize tenure. However, beyond becoming insurgent citizens in Holston’s terms, this chapter shows how social movements of the poor do more than simply use the law to protect home ownership: they are able to radically reinterpret constitutional law, so as to justify theoretically illegal acts of civil disobedience and promote a vision of a more just city.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andrade, J. (2001). ‘Da cultura da intervenção à intervenção da cultura: Consenso e gentrificação nas novas estrategias de revalorização do centro histórico de São Paulo’. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo. graduação.
Bedau, H. (ed.) (1991). Civil Disobedience in Focus. London: Routledge.
Bonduki, N. (1998). Origens da habitação social no Brasil. Arquitetura moderna, lei o inquilinato e difusão da casa própria. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade.
Brown, A., and A. Kristiansen (2009). Urban policies and the Right to the City. Rights, Responsibilities and Citizenship. Paris, UNESCO.
Caldeira, T.P.R. (2000). City of Walls: Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Comarú, F., R. Cymbalista, W. Sutti, and A.C. Teixeira (2005). ‘Conflitos em torno do direito à moradia na região central de São Paulo’. MAPAS: Monitoramento ativo da participação da sociedade. Rio de Janeiro, Ibase/ActionAid/Ford Foundation.
Fernandes, E. (2007a). ‘Constructing the “right to the city” in Brazil’. Social and Legal Change, 16 (2): 201–19.
Fernandes, E. (2007b). ‘Implementing the urban reform agenda in Brazil’. Environment and Urbanization, 19 (1): 177–89.
Freeden, M. (1991). Rights. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Grostein, M. (1987). ‘A cidade clandestina: Os ritos e os mitos. O papel da “irregularidade” na estruturação do espaço urbano no município de São Paulo. 1900–1987’. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo. PhD thesis.
Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jones, P. (2005). Rights. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Kipfer, S., K. Goonewardena, C. Schmid, and R. Milgrom (2008). ‘On the production of Henri Lefebvre’. In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, and C. Schmid (eds), Space, Difference, Everyday Life. Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge.
Kowarick, L. (1979). A espoliação urbana. São Paulo: Paz e terra.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities. Translated by E. Kofman, and E. Lebas. Oxford: Blackwell.
Maricato, E. (2000). As idéais fora do lugar e o lugar fora das idéias’. In O. Arantes, C. Vainer and E. Maricato (eds), A cidade do pensamento único: Desmanchando consensos. São Paulo: Editora Vozes.
Marques, E., and H. Torres (2005). São Paulo: Segregação, pobreza e desigualdades sociais. São Paulo: SENAC.
Mayer, M. (2009). ‘The right to the city in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements’. City, 13 (2): 362–74.
Parnell, S., and E. Pieterse (2010). ‘The “right to the city”: institutional imperatives of a developmental state’. International journal of urban and regional research, 34 (1): 146–62.
Presidência da República (2001). Lei N. 10.257, de 10 de julho de 2001. Brasilia, Casa Civil–Subchefia para assuntos juridicos. www.cidades.gov.br, accessed 22 September 2008.
Purcell, M. (2002). ‘Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant’. GeoJournal, 58: 99–108.
Rawls, J. (1991). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizek, C. (2003). ‘Os sentidos da cidade brasileira: Figurações da ordem e de seus avessos’. Espaço e debates. Revista de estudos regionais e urbanos, 23 (43–44): 79–91.
Rolnik, R. (1995). ‘The City and the Law: Legislation, Urban Policy and Territories in the City of São Paulo (1886–1936)’. New York: New York University. PhD thesis.
Rolnik, R., L. Kowarick, and N. Somekh (eds) (1991). São Paulo: Crise e Mudança. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
Santos, A.L.T. (ed.) (2002). Laboratório de projeto integrado e participativo para requalificação de cortiço. São Paulo: FAUUSP.
Santos, B.d.S. (1995). Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. London: Routledge.
Santos, M. (1996). ‘São Paulo: a growth process full of contradictions’. In A. Gilbert (ed.), The Mega- City in Latin America. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Simões, J. (1991). Corti ços em São Paulo: O problema e alternativas. São Paulo: Instituto Pólis.
Torres, H., H. Alves, and M. Aparecida De Oliveira (2007). ‘São Paulo peri-urban dynamics: some social causes and environmental consequences’. Environment and Urbanization, 19 (1): 207–23.
UNDP (2005). Human Development Report: International Co-operation at a Crossroads: Aid, Trade and Security in an Unequal World. New York: UNDP.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 United Nations University
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Earle, L. (2012). Irregular Urbanization as a Catalyst for Radical Social Mobilization: The Case of the Housing Movements of São Paulo. In: Rodgers, D., Beall, J., Kanbur, R. (eds) Latin American Urban Development into the 21st Century. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035134_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035134_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35077-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03513-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)