Skip to main content

Mobility Challenges in Santiago de Chile: Improving Diagnosis and the Need to Shift the Understanding of Urban Inequality from Fixed Enclaves to Mobile Gradients

  • Chapter
  • 353 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

Abstract

Many urban development interventions currently being implemented in cities in developing countries around the world arguably evidence a major blind spot with regard to their understanding of the ways in which contemporary urban living occurs, and how it is changing under processes related to both globalization and specific national and local issues. In particular, a key factor influencing contemporary forms of urban living relates to the unprecedented manner in which mobility, in its multiple forms, now impacts on urban dwellers’ lives, especially when compared to the past. Certainly, as the recent ‘mobility turn’ in the social sciences — see Cresswell (2006), Hannam et al. (2006), Sheller and Urry (2006a, 2006b), and Urry (2007), for example — has pointed out, the proliferation of different types of mobility — including migration, tourism, residential mobility, and daily mobility, amongst others — unavoidably has an impact on the organization of contemporary everyday life, and therefore constitutes a significant vector for the analysis of urban processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avellaneda, P. (2007). ‘Movilidad, Pobreza y exclusión Social: Un Estudio de Caso en la Ciudad de Lima’. Tesis doctoral, Departament de Geografia. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaujeau-Garnier, J. (1966). Geography of Population. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsdorf, A., and R. Hidalgo (2010). ‘From polarization to fragmentation. Recent changes in Latin American urbanization’. In P. Lindert and O. Verkoren (eds), Decentralized Development in Latin America: Experiences in Local Governance and Local Development. Amsterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAF (Corporación Andina de Fomento [Development Bank of Latin America]) (2009). ‘Observatorio de movilidad urbana para América Latina–Información para mejores políticas y mejores ciudades’, Corporación Andina de Fomento, Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, T. (2001). City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). ‘Materials for an explanatory theory of the network society’, British Journal of Sociology, 51 (1): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2005). Space of Flows, Spaces of Places: Materials for a Theory of Urbanism in the Information Age: Comparative Planning Cultures. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant, S. (2006). ‘Re-thinking the “feminization of poverty” in relation to aggregate gender indices’, Journal of Human Development, 7 (2): 201–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chant, S. (2007). Generation and Poverty: Exploring the ‘Feminization of Poverty’ in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccolella, P. (1999). ‘Globalizacion y dualizacion en la Region Metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Grandes inversiones y reestructuracion socioterritorial en los anos noventa’, EURE, 25 (76): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (2006). On the Move. Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M., and L. Lees (2005). ‘New-build “gentrification” and London’s riverside renaissance’ Environment and Planning, 37 (7): 1165–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaunay, D. (2007). ‘Relaciones entre pobreza, migración y movilidad: dimensiones territorial y contextual’. Revista Notas de Población–CELADE 84: 87–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escolano Utrilla, S., and J. Ortiz (2006). ‘Movilidad espacial de la población y cambios recientes del modelo de densidad en ciudades del sistema urbano chileno’. Geographicalia, 49: 139–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández L, J.E., J. de Cea Ch., and L. de Grange C. (2005). ‘Production costs, congestion, scope and scale economies in urban bus transportation corridors’. Transport Research Part A, 39: 383–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, O. (2005). ‘Transporte urbano y globalización, políticas y efectos en América Latina’. Revista EURE, 31 (94): 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galetovic, A. (2006). Santiago. Dónde estamos y hacia dónde vamos. Santiago: Centro de Estudios Públicos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., and S. Marvin (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, M., L. Pickup, and R. Whipp (1989). Gender, Transport and Employment: The Impact of Travel Constraints. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, A. (2010). ‘Movilidad, Transporte y Acceso: Una Renovación Aplicada al Ordenamiento Territorial’. Scripta Nova, XIV (331): 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry (2006). ‘Editorial: mobilities, immobilities and moorings’. Mobilities, 1 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, R. (2004). ‘De los pequeños condominios a la ciudad vallada: las urbanizaciones cerradas y la nueva geografía social en Santiago de Chile (1990– 2000)’. EURE, 30 (91): 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jara-Diaz, S., and A. Gschwender (2003). ‘Towards a general microeconomic model for the operation of public transport’. Transport Reviews, 23 (4): 453–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jirón, P. (2007). ‘Formalizing the Informal: the evolution of informal settlements in Chile’. In F. Hernández and P. Kellet (eds), Rethinking the Informal City: Critical Perspectives from Latin America. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirón, P. (2008). ‘Mobility on the Move: Examining Urban Daily Mobility Practices in Santiago de Chile’, PhD thesis, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirón, P. (2010a). ‘Repetition and difference: rhythms and mobile place-making in Santiago de Chile’. In T. Edensor (ed.), Geographies of Rhythm: Nature, Place, Mobilities and Bodies. Ashgate Publishing Limited: 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirón, P. (2010b). ‘On becoming “la sombre\the shadow”’. In M. Büscher, J. Urry, and K. Witchger (eds), Mobile Methods. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirón, P. (2012). ‘Technology and technicians out of control. The implementation of Transantiago from a daily mobility point of view’. In P. Vannini, L. Budd, O. Jensen, C. Fisker, and P. Jirón (eds), Mobility and Communication Technologies in the Americas. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirón, P., and G. Fadda (2003). ‘A Quality of Life Assessment to Improve Urban and Housing Policies in Chile’. World Bank Urban Research Symposium 2003, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouffe, Y., and F. Campos (2009). ‘Movilidad para la Emancipación o para el Arraigo: Interacción de las Escalas en París y Santiago de Chile’. Urbano, 12 (19): 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaztman, R. (2003). ‘La dimensión espacial en las políticas de superación de la pobreza urbana’. Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo. División de Desarrollo Sostenible y Asentamientos Humanos. Santiago de Chile, CEPAL: 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazo, A., and Y. Jouffe (2010). ‘Las prácticas cotidianas frente a los dispositivos de la movilidad aproximación política a la movilidad cotidiana de las poblaciones pobres periurbanas de Santiago de Chile’. Revista EURE, 108 (36): 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemanski, C. (2006a). ‘Spaces of exclusivity or connection? Linkages between a gated community and its poorer neighbour in a Cape Town master plan development’. Urban Studies, 42 (2): 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemanski, C. (2006b). ‘Desegregation and integration as linked or distinct? evidence from a previously “white” suburb in post-apartheid Cape Town’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30 (3): 564–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, C. (1992). Transport: Gender and Development. London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. (2005). ‘Transformaciones del espacio público en la ciudad latinoamericana: cambio espaciales y prácticas sociales’. Available from: www. bifurcaciones.cl/005/Low.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, F., and C. Araya (2000). ‘Transport and land use benefits under location externalities’. Environment and Planning A, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montezuma, R. (2003). ‘Ciudad y transporte, la movilidad urbana’. In M. Balbo, R. Jordán, and D. Simioni (eds), La Ciudad Inclusiva. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musterd, S. (2003). ‘Segregation and integration: a contested relationship’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29 (4): 623–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. (2007). ‘Ethnic and racial segregation: a critical perspective’. Geography Compass, 1: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, J. (2008). ‘Movilidad cotidiana, desigualdad social y segregación residencial en cuatro metrópolis de América Latina’. Revista EURE, XXXIV (103): 49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, J., and C. Arriagada (2004). ‘Segregación Residencial en la Ciudad Latinoamericana’. EURE, 30 (89): 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitman, S. (2004). ‘Urbanizaciones cerradas: estado de la cuestión hoy y propuesta teórica’. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 32: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, F., and R. Salcedo (2005). ‘Gated Communities and the Poor in Santiago, Chile: Functional and Symbolic Integration in a Context of Aggressive Capitalist Colonization of Lower Class Areas’. International symposium on Territory, Control and Enclosure: The Ecology of Urban Fragmentation, Research Network: Private Urban Governance, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, F., G. Cáceres, and J. Cerda (2001a). ‘Residential Segregations Pattern Changes in Main Chilean Cities: Scale Shifts and Increasing Malignancy’. International seminar on Segregation in the City, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, F., G. Cáceres, and J. Cerda (2001b). ‘Segregación residencial en las principales ciudades chilenas: Tendencias de las últimas décadas y posibles cursos de acción’. Revista EURE, 27 (82): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salcedo, R., and A. Torres (2004). ‘Gated communities in Santiago: wall or frontier?’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28 (1): 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City (second edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (ed.) (2002). Global Networks, Linked Cities. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2006). Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M., G. Bagnall, and B. Longhurst (2005). Globalization and Belonging. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schteingart, M. (2001). ‘La División Social del Espacio en las Ciudades’. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., and J. Urry (2003). ‘Mobile transformations of “public” and “private” life’. Theory, Culture and Society, 20 (3): 107–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., and J. Urry (2006a). ‘The new mobilities paradigm’. Environment and Planning, A38: 207–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., and J. Urry (2006b). Mobile Technologies of the City. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I. (2002). ‘Impacto de las tendencias sociales, económicas y tecnológicas sobre el transporte público: investigación preliminar en ciudades de América Latina’. Santiago: División de Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura, CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., and M. Grieco (2000). ‘Research note: gender and time poverty: the neglected social policy implications of gendered time, transport and travel’. Time and Society, 9 (1): 129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ureta, S. (2009). ‘Manejando por Santiago. Explorando el uso de automóviles por parte de habitantes de bajos ingresos desde una óptica de movilidad sustentable’. Revista EURE, XXXV (105): 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2003). ‘Social networks, travel and talk’. British Journal of Sociology, 54 (2): 155–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcellos, E. (2001). Transporte Urbano, Espaço e Equidade: Analise das Politicas Publicas. Sao Paulo: Annablume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigar, G. (2002). The Policies of Mobility. Transport, the Environment and Public Policy. London: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C., G. Glasze, and K. Frantz (2002). ‘The global spread of gated communities’. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29 (3): 315–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jirón, P. (2012). Mobility Challenges in Santiago de Chile: Improving Diagnosis and the Need to Shift the Understanding of Urban Inequality from Fixed Enclaves to Mobile Gradients. In: Rodgers, D., Beall, J., Kanbur, R. (eds) Latin American Urban Development into the 21st Century. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035134_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics