Abstract
Many urban development interventions currently being implemented in cities in developing countries around the world arguably evidence a major blind spot with regard to their understanding of the ways in which contemporary urban living occurs, and how it is changing under processes related to both globalization and specific national and local issues. In particular, a key factor influencing contemporary forms of urban living relates to the unprecedented manner in which mobility, in its multiple forms, now impacts on urban dwellers’ lives, especially when compared to the past. Certainly, as the recent ‘mobility turn’ in the social sciences — see Cresswell (2006), Hannam et al. (2006), Sheller and Urry (2006a, 2006b), and Urry (2007), for example — has pointed out, the proliferation of different types of mobility — including migration, tourism, residential mobility, and daily mobility, amongst others — unavoidably has an impact on the organization of contemporary everyday life, and therefore constitutes a significant vector for the analysis of urban processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avellaneda, P. (2007). ‘Movilidad, Pobreza y exclusión Social: Un Estudio de Caso en la Ciudad de Lima’. Tesis doctoral, Departament de Geografia. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Beaujeau-Garnier, J. (1966). Geography of Population. London: Longman.
Borsdorf, A., and R. Hidalgo (2010). ‘From polarization to fragmentation. Recent changes in Latin American urbanization’. In P. Lindert and O. Verkoren (eds), Decentralized Development in Latin America: Experiences in Local Governance and Local Development. Amsterdam: Springer.
CAF (Corporación Andina de Fomento [Development Bank of Latin America]) (2009). ‘Observatorio de movilidad urbana para América Latina–Información para mejores políticas y mejores ciudades’, Corporación Andina de Fomento, Caracas.
Caldeira, T. (2001). City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2000). ‘Materials for an explanatory theory of the network society’, British Journal of Sociology, 51 (1): 5–24.
Castells, M. (2005). Space of Flows, Spaces of Places: Materials for a Theory of Urbanism in the Information Age: Comparative Planning Cultures. Oxford: Routledge.
Chant, S. (2006). ‘Re-thinking the “feminization of poverty” in relation to aggregate gender indices’, Journal of Human Development, 7 (2): 201–20.
Chant, S. (2007). Generation and Poverty: Exploring the ‘Feminization of Poverty’ in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ciccolella, P. (1999). ‘Globalizacion y dualizacion en la Region Metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Grandes inversiones y reestructuracion socioterritorial en los anos noventa’, EURE, 25 (76): 22.
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the Move. Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York: Routledge.
Davidson, M., and L. Lees (2005). ‘New-build “gentrification” and London’s riverside renaissance’ Environment and Planning, 37 (7): 1165–90.
Delaunay, D. (2007). ‘Relaciones entre pobreza, migración y movilidad: dimensiones territorial y contextual’. Revista Notas de Población–CELADE 84: 87–130.
Escolano Utrilla, S., and J. Ortiz (2006). ‘Movilidad espacial de la población y cambios recientes del modelo de densidad en ciudades del sistema urbano chileno’. Geographicalia, 49: 139–56.
Fernández L, J.E., J. de Cea Ch., and L. de Grange C. (2005). ‘Production costs, congestion, scope and scale economies in urban bus transportation corridors’. Transport Research Part A, 39: 383–403.
Figueroa, O. (2005). ‘Transporte urbano y globalización, políticas y efectos en América Latina’. Revista EURE, 31 (94): 41–53.
Galetovic, A. (2006). Santiago. Dónde estamos y hacia dónde vamos. Santiago: Centro de Estudios Públicos.
Graham, S., and S. Marvin (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
Grieco, M., L. Pickup, and R. Whipp (1989). Gender, Transport and Employment: The Impact of Travel Constraints. Aldershot: Gower.
Gutiérrez, A. (2010). ‘Movilidad, Transporte y Acceso: Una Renovación Aplicada al Ordenamiento Territorial’. Scripta Nova, XIV (331): 86.
Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry (2006). ‘Editorial: mobilities, immobilities and moorings’. Mobilities, 1 (1): 1–22.
Hidalgo, R. (2004). ‘De los pequeños condominios a la ciudad vallada: las urbanizaciones cerradas y la nueva geografía social en Santiago de Chile (1990– 2000)’. EURE, 30 (91): 29–52.
Jara-Diaz, S., and A. Gschwender (2003). ‘Towards a general microeconomic model for the operation of public transport’. Transport Reviews, 23 (4): 453–69.
Jirón, P. (2007). ‘Formalizing the Informal: the evolution of informal settlements in Chile’. In F. Hernández and P. Kellet (eds), Rethinking the Informal City: Critical Perspectives from Latin America. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Jirón, P. (2008). ‘Mobility on the Move: Examining Urban Daily Mobility Practices in Santiago de Chile’, PhD thesis, London School of Economics.
Jirón, P. (2010a). ‘Repetition and difference: rhythms and mobile place-making in Santiago de Chile’. In T. Edensor (ed.), Geographies of Rhythm: Nature, Place, Mobilities and Bodies. Ashgate Publishing Limited: 129–143.
Jirón, P. (2010b). ‘On becoming “la sombre\the shadow”’. In M. Büscher, J. Urry, and K. Witchger (eds), Mobile Methods. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.
Jirón, P. (2012). ‘Technology and technicians out of control. The implementation of Transantiago from a daily mobility point of view’. In P. Vannini, L. Budd, O. Jensen, C. Fisker, and P. Jirón (eds), Mobility and Communication Technologies in the Americas. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Jirón, P., and G. Fadda (2003). ‘A Quality of Life Assessment to Improve Urban and Housing Policies in Chile’. World Bank Urban Research Symposium 2003, Washington DC.
Jouffe, Y., and F. Campos (2009). ‘Movilidad para la Emancipación o para el Arraigo: Interacción de las Escalas en París y Santiago de Chile’. Urbano, 12 (19): 7–16.
Kaztman, R. (2003). ‘La dimensión espacial en las políticas de superación de la pobreza urbana’. Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo. División de Desarrollo Sostenible y Asentamientos Humanos. Santiago de Chile, CEPAL: 48.
Lazo, A., and Y. Jouffe (2010). ‘Las prácticas cotidianas frente a los dispositivos de la movilidad aproximación política a la movilidad cotidiana de las poblaciones pobres periurbanas de Santiago de Chile’. Revista EURE, 108 (36): 29–47.
Lemanski, C. (2006a). ‘Spaces of exclusivity or connection? Linkages between a gated community and its poorer neighbour in a Cape Town master plan development’. Urban Studies, 42 (2): 397–420.
Lemanski, C. (2006b). ‘Desegregation and integration as linked or distinct? evidence from a previously “white” suburb in post-apartheid Cape Town’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30 (3): 564–86.
Levy, C. (1992). Transport: Gender and Development. London, Routledge.
Low, S. (2005). ‘Transformaciones del espacio público en la ciudad latinoamericana: cambio espaciales y prácticas sociales’. Available from: www. bifurcaciones.cl/005/Low.htm
Martinez, F., and C. Araya (2000). ‘Transport and land use benefits under location externalities’. Environment and Planning A, 32.
Montezuma, R. (2003). ‘Ciudad y transporte, la movilidad urbana’. In M. Balbo, R. Jordán, and D. Simioni (eds), La Ciudad Inclusiva. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
Musterd, S. (2003). ‘Segregation and integration: a contested relationship’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29 (4): 623–41.
Phillips, D. (2007). ‘Ethnic and racial segregation: a critical perspective’. Geography Compass, 1: 1–22.
Rodríguez, J. (2008). ‘Movilidad cotidiana, desigualdad social y segregación residencial en cuatro metrópolis de América Latina’. Revista EURE, XXXIV (103): 49–71.
Rodríguez, J., and C. Arriagada (2004). ‘Segregación Residencial en la Ciudad Latinoamericana’. EURE, 30 (89): 5–24.
Roitman, S. (2004). ‘Urbanizaciones cerradas: estado de la cuestión hoy y propuesta teórica’. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 32: 5–19.
Sabatini, F., and R. Salcedo (2005). ‘Gated Communities and the Poor in Santiago, Chile: Functional and Symbolic Integration in a Context of Aggressive Capitalist Colonization of Lower Class Areas’. International symposium on Territory, Control and Enclosure: The Ecology of Urban Fragmentation, Research Network: Private Urban Governance, Pretoria.
Sabatini, F., G. Cáceres, and J. Cerda (2001a). ‘Residential Segregations Pattern Changes in Main Chilean Cities: Scale Shifts and Increasing Malignancy’. International seminar on Segregation in the City, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge MA.
Sabatini, F., G. Cáceres, and J. Cerda (2001b). ‘Segregación residencial en las principales ciudades chilenas: Tendencias de las últimas décadas y posibles cursos de acción’. Revista EURE, 27 (82): 1–23.
Salcedo, R., and A. Torres (2004). ‘Gated communities in Santiago: wall or frontier?’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28 (1): 27–44.
Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City (second edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sassen, S. (ed.) (2002). Global Networks, Linked Cities. London and New York: Routledge.
Sassen, S. (2006). Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Savage, M., G. Bagnall, and B. Longhurst (2005). Globalization and Belonging. London: Sage.
Schteingart, M. (2001). ‘La División Social del Espacio en las Ciudades’. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 19.
Sheller, M., and J. Urry (2003). ‘Mobile transformations of “public” and “private” life’. Theory, Culture and Society, 20 (3): 107–25.
Sheller, M., and J. Urry (2006a). ‘The new mobilities paradigm’. Environment and Planning, A38: 207–26.
Sheller, M., and J. Urry (2006b). Mobile Technologies of the City. London: Routledge.
Thomson, I. (2002). ‘Impacto de las tendencias sociales, económicas y tecnológicas sobre el transporte público: investigación preliminar en ciudades de América Latina’. Santiago: División de Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura, CEPAL.
Turner, J., and M. Grieco (2000). ‘Research note: gender and time poverty: the neglected social policy implications of gendered time, transport and travel’. Time and Society, 9 (1): 129–36.
Ureta, S. (2009). ‘Manejando por Santiago. Explorando el uso de automóviles por parte de habitantes de bajos ingresos desde una óptica de movilidad sustentable’. Revista EURE, XXXV (105): 71–93.
Urry, J. (2003). ‘Social networks, travel and talk’. British Journal of Sociology, 54 (2): 155–75.
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Vasconcellos, E. (2001). Transporte Urbano, Espaço e Equidade: Analise das Politicas Publicas. Sao Paulo: Annablume.
Vigar, G. (2002). The Policies of Mobility. Transport, the Environment and Public Policy. London: Spon Press.
Webster, C., G. Glasze, and K. Frantz (2002). ‘The global spread of gated communities’. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29 (3): 315–20.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 United Nations University
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jirón, P. (2012). Mobility Challenges in Santiago de Chile: Improving Diagnosis and the Need to Shift the Understanding of Urban Inequality from Fixed Enclaves to Mobile Gradients. In: Rodgers, D., Beall, J., Kanbur, R. (eds) Latin American Urban Development into the 21st Century. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035134_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035134_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35077-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03513-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)