Abstract
There is great confusion as to the exact meaning of privacy. As Solove puts it, privacy is a concept in disarray. It is a sweeping concept and nobody can articulate what it means.2 In this respect,3 privacy has successively been conceptualised in terms of ‘right to be let alone’,4 control over personal information,5 the construction of one’s identity,6 informational self-determination,7 or contextual integrity.8 What clearly emerges from these attempted conceptualisations of privacy is that privacy is a multidimensional, multi-faceted concept, the complexity of which is therefore hard to grasp within a single conceptual setting. Some do argue that privacy should not be defined at all, since such definition would bear the risk of limiting and ‘freezing’ its meaning and effects (especially in the legal field).9 Indeed, as Solove points out, some theories are too narrow (solely focusing on information, or access to the self), others are too broad (e.g., the right to be let alone, which is an emanation of personhood), whereas others are both too broad and too narrow at times.10
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This contribution is based on the first deliverable of the EU FP7 PRESCIENT project, in which the VUB is participating. See http://www.prescient-project.eu/prescient/index.php (last accessed 7 October 2011).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Agre, Ph., E. and M. Rotenberg, Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
Article 29 Working Party, Opinion 3/2010 on the principle of accountability, 00062/10/EN, WP 173, adopted on 13 July 2010.
Article 29 Working Party, The Future of Privacy, Joint Contribution to the Consultation of the European Commission on the legal framework for the fundamental right to protection of personal data, 02356/09/EN WP168, adopted on 1 December 2009.
Bennett, C., J. and Ch. D., Raab, The Governance of Privacy–Policy Instruments in a Global Perspective, Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 2006.
Berlin, I., Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.
De Hert, P. and S. Gutwirth, ‘Data Protection in the Case Law of Strasbourg and Luxembourg: Constitutionalism in Action,’ in S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, P. De Hert, C. de Terwagne and S. Nouwt (eds) Reinventing Data Protection?, Springer, Dordrecht, 2002, pp. 3–44.
De Hert, P. and R., Bellanova, Data Protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: A System Still to Be Fully Developed?, Brussels: European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, 2009.
De Hert, P. and S. Gutwirth, ‘Privacy, Data Protection and Law Enforcement. Opacity of the Individual and Transparency of Power,’ in E. Claes, A. Duff and S. Gutwirth (eds), Privacy and the Criminal Law, Antwerp/Oxford: Intersentia, 2006, pp. 61–104.
De Hert, P. and S. Gutwirth. ‘Regulating Profiling in a Democratic Constitutional State,’ in M. Hildebrandt and S., Gutwirth, (eds), Profiling the European Citizen. Cross disciplinary Perspectives. Dordrecht, Springer, 2008, p. 271–91.
European Parliament and the Council, Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. OJL 281, 23 November 1995.
Guild, E. and S. Carrera, ‘The European Union’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice Ten Years On,’ in E. Guild, S. Carrera and A. Eggenschwiler, (eds), The European Union’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice Ten Years On–Successes and Future Challenges under the Stockholm Programme, Brussels, European Union and Centre for European Policy Studies, 2010, pp. 1–12.
Gutwirth, S., Privacy in the Information Age, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002.
Gutwirth, Serge, ‘De polyfonie van de democratische rechtsstaat,’ in M. Elchardus (ed.), Wantrouwen en onbehagen, VUB Press, Brussels, 1998, pp. 137–93.
Nissenbaum, H., Privacy in Context, Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life, Stanford: Stanford Law Books, 2010.
Poullet, Y., ‘About the E-Privacy Directive: Towards a Third Generation of Data Protection Legislation?,’ in S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet and P. De Hert (eds.), Data Protection in a Profiled World, Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 3–30.
Poullet, Y., ‘Pour une troisième generation de règlementation de protection des données Défis du droit à la protection de la vie privée — Challenges of Privacy and Data Protection Law,’ in M. V. Pérez-Asinari and P. Palazzi (eds.), Brussels, Bruylant, 2008, pp. 25–70.
Rigaux, F., (ed.), La vie privée, une liberté parmis les autres?, Larcier, Brussels, 1992.
Rodotà, S., ‘Data protection as a fundamental right,’ in S.Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, P. De Hert, C. de Terwagne and S. Nouwt, (eds) Reinventing Data Protection?, Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, pp. 77–82.
Roosendaal, A., We Are All Connected to Facebook… By Facebook!, on file with the author, 2011.
Rosier, K., ‘La directive 2002/58/CE vie privée et communications électroniques et la directive 95/46/CE relative à au traitement des données à caractère personnel: comment les (ré)concilier?,’ in Défis du droit à la protection de la vie privée, Cahiers du C.R.I.D. n°31, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2008, pp. 328–52.
Rouvroy, A. and Y. Poullet, ‘The Right to Informational Self-Determination and the Value of Self-Development: Reassessing the Importance of Privacy for Democracy,’ in S.Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, P. De Hert, C. de Terwagne and S. Nouwt, (eds), Reinventing Data Protection?, Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, pp. 45–76.
Schwartz, P. M. and W. M. Treanor, ‘The New Privacy,’ Michigan Law Review, vol. 101, 2003, pp. 2163–84.
Solove, D. J. Understanding Privacy, London, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.
Solove, Daniel, ‘The Digital Person and the Future of Privacy,’ in K. J. Strandburg and D. S. Raicu (eds), Privacy and Technologies of Identity: A Cross-Disciplinary Conversation, Springer, 2006, pp. 3–13, also in M.V. Pérez-Asinari and P. Palazzi, ‘Défis du droit à la protection de la vie privée–Challenges of Privacy and Data Protection Law,’ Bruylant, Brussels, 2008, pp. 355–65.
Sudre, F., ‘Rapport Introductif: La ‘Construction’ Par Le Juge Européen Du Droit Au Respect De La Vie Privée,’ in F. Sudre, (ed.) Le Droit Au Respect De La Vie Privée Au Sens De La Convention Européenne Des Droits De L’homme, Brussels: Bruylant, Nemesis, 2005, pp. 1–15.
Warren, S. and D. L. D. Brandeis, ‘The Right to Privacy,’ Harvard Law Review, vol. 4, no. 193, 1890, pp. 193–220.
Westin, A., Privacy and Freedom, New York: Atheneum, 1967.
Wright D., P. De Hert and S. Gutwirth, ‘Are the OECD Guidelines at 30 Showing Their Age?,’ Communications of the ACM, Vol. 54/2, February 2011, 119–27.
Wright, D., S. Gutwirth, M. Friedewald, E. Vildjiounaite and Y. Punie, (eds), Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence, Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Raphaël Gellert and Serge Gutwirth
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gellert, R., Gutwirth, S. (2012). Beyond Accountability, the Return to Privacy?. In: Guagnin, D., Hempel, L., Ilten, C., Kroener, I., Neyland, D., Postigo, H. (eds) Managing Privacy through Accountability. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032225_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032225_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35045-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03222-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)