Skip to main content

Resisting Americans

The Precarious Politics of Asylum

  • Chapter
Canada/US and Other Unfriendly Relations
  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

In Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, Judith Butler laments the loss of the value of dissent as part of the fabric of contem-porar y A merica n democrat ic cu ltu re. A “you’re w ith us or you’re w ith the terrorists” narrative spun in post-9/11 America serves to stifle intellectual debate from the Left, quell the media, and make a mockery of the antiwar movement. This suppression of dissent works in tandem with a suspension of civil liberties for illegal immigrants and suspected terrorists, all working toward producing a consensus on what certain terms, such as “terrorism,” get to mean and for whom it is reserved. Butler writes:

The United States, by using the term positions itself exclusively as the sudden and indisputable victim of violence, even though there is no doubt that it did suffer violence. But it is one matter to suffer violence and quite another to use that fact to ground a framework in which one’s injury authorizes limitless aggression against targets that may or may not be related to the source of one’s own suffering.3

What Butler identifies as a first-person narrative renders the suffering of others, or more to the point, the violence inflicted upon the Other, most notably Arabs, in the “war on terror”, invisible; their lives made to not count, their deaths thus ungrievable and public mourning impossible.

If someone did this to my street, I would pick up a weapon and fight. I can’t kill these people. They’re not terrorists. They’re fourteen-year-old boys, they’re old men. We’re occupying the streets. We raid houses. We grab people. We send them off to Abu Ghraib, where they’re tortured. These are innocent people. We stop cars, we hinder everyday life. If I did this in the States, I’d be thrown in prison.

Darrell Anderson1

I didn’t know much about the Geneva Conventions, but I knew one thing: what I had witnessed was wrong. We were soldiers of the U.S. Army. In Iraq, we were supposed to be stomping out terrorism, bringing democracy, and acting as a force for good in the world. Instead we had become monsters in a residential neighborhood.

Joshua Key2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Quoted in Peter Laufer, Mission Rejected: U.S. Soldiers Who Say No to Iraq (White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Junction Publishing Company, 2006), p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joshua Key, The Deserter’s Tale: The Story of an Ordinary Soldier Who Walked Away from the War in Iraq (Toronto, ON: House of Anansi Press, 2007), p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Judith Butler, Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence (London and New York: Verso, 2003), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gloria Galloway, “Canadians oppose Iraq war, poll,” The Globe and Mail, Monday, June 29, 2008, www.theglobeandmail.com.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sherene Razack, Dark Threats, and White Knights: The Somalia Affair, Peacekeeping, and the New Imperialism (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2004), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Walter Dorn, “Canadian peacekeeping: Proud tradition, strong future?” Canadian Foreign Policy 12, no. 2 (Fall 2005), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michael Valpy, “The ballad of the blue beret,” The Globe and Mail, November 11, 2006, p. F4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anthony Wilson-Smith, “Canada and the world,” MacLean’s, April 12, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scott Watson, “The reluctant refuge: Contrasting Canada’s refugee and border control policies,” Paper presented at Canada as Refuge Conference, University of Edinburgh, May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mike Blanchfield, “Tories counter protests over visa changes,” The Ottawa Citizen, Wednesday, July 15, 2009, www.theottawacitizen.com.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John Hagan, Northern Passage: American Vietnam Resisters in Canada (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2001). p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Patricia Molloy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Molloy, P. (2012). Resisting Americans. In: Canada/US and Other Unfriendly Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031457_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics