Abstract
French women’s life writing has been a fruitful topic for Anglo-American scholars. Dena Goodman’s 2009 Becoming a Woman in the Age of Letters focuses on the private world of female epistolarity, eschewing a study of the published woman writer and turning instead to women who write. Goodman demonstrates convincingly that letter-writing was, for the French woman, ‘a crucial step in developing a consciousness of themselves as gendered subjects in the modern world’, life writing in which they constructed their identities through coded and revelatory exchanges with private correspondents.2 In Joan Hinde Stewart’s 2010 study of women’s letters in eighteenth-century France, her subjects are all published authors, the grandes dames of eighteenth-century French letters. Through an examination of their unpublished work — the letters of prominent writers and salonnières Françoise de Graffigny, Marie Riccoboni and Isabelle de Charrière, and their attitude to ageing — Stewart writes a book ‘about the ways in which a group of older women claimed ownership of their lives’.3 She does not emphasize that her topic is life writing, but of course it is: Graffigny’s (1695–1758) letters are read as ‘an unparalleled source of information about the intimate organization of an eighteenth-century woman’s life’, with no detail too personal or trivial to narrate ‘neither her crystal goblets nor her satin slips, neither her debts, nor her menses’.4
It is well known that the Ladies abroad, particularly in France, value themselves and are greatly extolled for their Skill in writing letters; and surely the British Fair are not inferior to them in Understanding.
(The Ladies Complete Letter-Writer (1763))1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Dena Goodman, Becoming a Woman in the Age of Letters (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2009), p. 4.
Joan Hinde Stewart, Women, Letters and Growing Old in Eighteenth-Century France (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2010), p. 5.
Susan Staves, A Literary History of Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 293.
Mary Delany, The Autobiography and Correspondence of Mrs. Delany, ed. Sarah Chauncey, 3 vols (Boston: Roberts Bros., 1879), vol. 1, p. 465.
See Clìona O’Gallchoir, Maria Edgeworth: Women, Enlightenment, Nation (Dublin: University of Dublin Press, 2005).
Maria Edgeworth, Practical Education, ed. Susan Manly, The Novels and Selected Works of Maria Edgeworth, 12 vols (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2003), vol. 11, p. 217.
See Gabriel de Broglie, Madame de Genlis (Paris: Libraries Académique Perrin, 2001), p. 446.
Kathleen Hart, Revolution and Women’s Autobiography in Nineteenth-Century France (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2004).
Quoted in Anna Nikliborc, L’Œuvre de Mme de Genlis (Wroclaw: Romanica Wratislaviensia, 1969), p. 7.
Diego Saglia, ‘National Internationalism: Women’s Writing and European Literature, 1800–1830’, in Jacqueline M. Labbe (ed.), The History of British Women’s Writing, 1750–1830 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 268–87 (269).
For a full account of this correspondence, and transcripts, of Genlis’s letters, in French, and Croker’s, in English, see Jacques Bertaud, ‘Madame de Genlis, John Wilson Croker et la Révolution Française’, Revue de Litterature Comparée 3 (1977), pp. 256–365.
Boyd Hilton, ‘“Sardonic Grins” and “Paranoid Politics”: Religion, Economics, and Public Policy in the Quarterly Review’, in Jonathan Cutmore (ed.), Conservatism and the Quarterly Review (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2007), pp. 41–60 (44).
See Patricia Thomson, George Sand and the Victorians: Her Influence and Reputation in Nineteenth-Century England (London: Macmillan, 1977), p. 14.
See Diana Holmes, French Women’s Writing: 1848–1994 (London: Athlone, 1996), p. 9.
Maria Edgeworth, The Life and Letters of Maria Edgeworth, ed. Augustus John Cuthbert, 2 vols (London: Edward Arnold, 1894), vol. 2, p. 351. Although the date of this letter — 19 January 1829 — seems to be a somewhat tardy response to Croker’s 1826 article, Edgeworth is clearly referring to the volume of the Quarterly for 1826 which, alongside the review of Genlis’s Memoirs, contains both a review of The Subaltern, and a review of Scott’s Lives of the Novelists, another publication that Edgeworth goes on to mention.
Quoted in Elisabeth Jay, ‘British Women Writers and the Mid-Nineteenth-Century Parisian Salon’, in Hilary Brown and Gillian Dow (eds), Readers, Writers, Salonnières: Female Networks in Europe 1700–1900 (Bern: Peter Lang, 2011), pp. 145–62 (152).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Gillian Dow
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dow, G. (2012). A Model for the British Fair? French Women’s Life Writing in Britain, 1680–1830. In: Cook, D., Culley, A. (eds) Women’s Life Writing, 1700–1850. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030771_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030771_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-59480-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03077-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)