Abstract
In 1954, the then British Prime Minister Winston Churchill made a widely quoted remark that it is ‘better to jaw-jaw than to war-war.’1 While this is usually interpreted as a metaphorical declaration that negotiations are preferable to war, it does highlight the point that peacemaking is a matter of talking and therefore of language. However, the importance of language in peacemaking is rarely examined in detail. It has been particularly neglected where, as is most often the case, different languages are in play between the protagonists.2 The authors were participants in a research programme, Languages at War, which set out to rectify this neglect by examining the policies and practices relating to languages in situations of conflict.3 This book presents our findings on the complex issues of language confronting the international forces that sought to bring peace to Bosnia-Herzegovina in the 1990s. It examines how the issues were approached by the military and the key role of people from the area in helping to resolve them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Michael Kelly and Catherine Baker
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kelly, M., Baker, C. (2013). Introduction. In: Interpreting the Peace. Palgrave Studies in Languages at War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029843_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029843_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44025-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02984-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)