Abstract
This chapter focuses on the relationship between identity performance and language choice in social media, and how such choice may be shaped by existing practices in more traditional media. Identity is a fluid concept. Some aspects of identity are relatively static and not easy to change, such as age, gender, and nationality. Other aspects are defined by social domains (e.g. work, family, and education) and relationships (e.g. friends, colleagues, and family). Some forms of identity can change from time to time, such as hobbies, interests and social networks. The plural form identities thus seems a more appropriate term to use in the context of this chapter. What this understanding of identity also highlights is that these properties are not pre-determined and fixed, but are open to transformation and changes. These changes may be a result of different contexts of interaction, or the ways interlocutors interpret the identities being projected. In any given context of interaction, there may be one or more aspects of identity that people may or may not want to express or reveal. Identities, as Goffman (1990[1959]) puts it, are like masks that can be worn and taken off in different contexts of social interaction.
When I leave a comment on my colleague’s Facebook page, I know that some of his students may be able to see it…so I pretend to sound serious and formal…so that our students would think that we are talking about something constructive… I take time to polish and edit [my comments].
(Tony, 3rd year undergraduate student and a pre-service English teacher in Hong Kong)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Androutsopoulos, J. (2007) ‘Style online: Doing hip-hop on the Germanspeaking Web’. In P. Auer (ed.) Style and Social Identities: Alternative Approaches to Linguistic Heterogeneity (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 279–317.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2010) ‘Localizing the global on the participatory web’. In N. Coupland (ed.) The Handbook of Language and Globalization (Oxford; Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 203–31.
Barton, D. (2011). ‘Ethnographic approaches to literacy research’. In Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local Literacies (London: Routledge).
Bennett, S., Maton, K. & Kervin, L. (2008) ‘The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5): 775–86.
Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y. & Ward, K. (eds.) (2005). Domestication of Media and Technologies (Maidenhead: Open University Press).
Bolton, K. (2002) ‘The sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the space for Hong Kong English’. In K. Bolton (ed.) Hong Kong English: Autonomy and Creativity (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press), pp. 29–56.
boyd, d. (2008) ‘Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life’. In D. Buckingham (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 119–42.
Ching, C. C. & Vigdor, L. (2005) Technobiographies: Perspectives from Education and the Arts. Paper presented at the First International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Champaign, IL.
Crandall, J. (2007) Showing, http://jordancrandall.com/showing/index.html (accessed: 1 May 2012).
Crystal, D. (2001) Language and the Internet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
DiMicco, J. M. & Millen, D. R. (2007) ‘Identity management: Multiple presentations of self in Facebook’. In Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 383–6.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2007) Small Stories, Interaction, and Identities (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
Goffman, E. (1990[1959]). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (London: Penguin).
Graham, L. (2008) ‘Teachers are digikids too: The digital histories and digital lives of young teachers in English primary schools’, Literacy, 42(1): 10–18.
Greene, J. & Bloome, D. (1997) ‘Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: A situated perspective’. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath & D. Lapp (eds.) Handbook of Research in Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts (New York: Simon Schuster, Macmillan).
Hargittai, E. (2010) ‘Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation”’, Sociological Enquiry, 80: 92–113.
Herring, S. C. (2013) ‘Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent’. In D. Tannen & A. M. Tester (eds.) Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
Higgins, E. T. (1987) ‘Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect’, Psychological Review, 94(3): 319–40.
James, G. (2001) ‘Cantonese particles in Hong Kong students’ English emails’, English Today, 17: 9–16.
Jones, R. (2012) Discourse Analysis (Abingdon: Routledge).
Kennedy, H. (2003) ‘Technobiography: Researching lives, online and off’, Biography, 26(1): 120–39.
Lange, P. (2007) ‘Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~apidduck/CS432/Assignments/YouTube.pdf (accessed 1 May 2012).
Lee, C. (2002) ‘Literacy practices of computer-mediated communication in Hong Kong’. Special Issue of Reading Matrix: Literacy and the Web, 2(2). www.readingmatrix.com/articles/lee/article.pdf (accessed: 1 May 2012).
Lee, C. (2007) ‘Affordances and text-making practices in online instant messaging’, Written Communication, 24(3): 223–49.
Lee, C. (2011) ‘Texts and practices of micro-blogging: Status updates on Facebook’. In C. Thurlow & K. Mroczek (eds.) Digital Discourse: Language in New Media (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 110–30.
Lee, C. (2013) ‘My English is so poor…so I take photos’. Meta-linguistic discourse of English online’. In D. Tannen & A. M. Tester (eds.) Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
Lee, C. & Barton, D. (2012) ‘Researching the texts and practices in an online photo-sharing site’. In M. Sebba, S. Mahootian & C. Jonsson (eds.) Language Mixing and Code-Switching in Writing: Approaches to Mixed-Language Written Discourse (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 128–45.
Linde, C. (1987) ‘Explanatory systems in oral life stories’. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (eds.) Cultural Models in Language and Thought (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 343–66.
Mendelson, A. L. & Papacharissi, Z. (2011) ‘Look at us: Collective narcissism in college student Facebook photo galleries’. In Z. Papacharissi (ed.) The Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 251–73.
Ng, T. H. (2012) Facebook Communication in Hong Kong: An Evolved ICQ Interaction in Bilingualism. Unpublished MA thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Page, R. (2012) Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction (Abingdon: Routledge).
Prensky, M. (2001) ‘Digital natives, digital immigrants’, On the Horizon 9(1): 1–6.
Rosenwald, G., & Ochberg, R. (1992) Storied Lives: The Cultural Politics of Self-understanding (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
Sebba, M. & Wootton, T. (1998) ‘We, they, and identity’. In P. Auer (ed.) Code-switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity (London: Routledge), pp. 262–89.
Selfe, C. & Hawisher, G. (2004) Literate Lives in the Information Age (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
Silverstone, R. & Haddon, L. (1996) ‘Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life’. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (eds.) Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 44–74.
Tagg, C. & Seargeant, P. (2012) ‘Writing systems at play in Thai-English online interactions’, Writing Systems Research, 4(2): 195–213.
Thurlow, C. (2007) ‘Fabricating youth: New media discourse and the technologization of young people’. In S. Johnson & A. Ensslin (eds.) Language in the Media (London: Continuum), pp. 213–33.
Warschauer, M., El Said, G. R. & Zohry, A. A. (2007) ‘Language choice online: Globalization and identity in Egypt’. In B. Danet & S. C. Herring (eds.) The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 303–18.
Wellman, B. (2001) ‘Physical place and cyber place: The rise of personalized networking’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25: 227–52.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Carmen Lee
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, C. (2014). Language choice and self-presentation in social media: the case of university students in Hong Kong. In: Seargeant, P., Tagg, C. (eds) The Language of Social Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44013-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02931-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)