Institutional Analysis and Collective Mobilization in a Comparative Assessment of Two Cooperatives in India
- 136 Downloads
Cooperatives as a form of economic organization represent one of the main alternatives to shareholder-based capitalism. There are over 1 billion members of cooperatives worldwide, and they employ more than 100 million women and men – 20 per cent more than multinational enterprises (International Cooperative Alliance, ICA, 2011). The ICA (2011) defines a cooperative as ‘an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social, and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically-controlled enterprise’. The United Nations estimated in 1994 that the livelihood of nearly 3 billion people was supported by cooperative enterprise, underlining their significant economic and social roles in their communities. It is a testimony to their economic and social significance that the International Labour Organization has declared 2012 to be the International Year of Cooperatives.
KeywordsLabour Regime Institutional Analysis Wage Structure Class Mobilization Political Weekly
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Attwood, D.M. and Baviskar, B.S. (1987) ‘Why Do Some Co-operatives Work but Not Others? A Comparative Analysis of Sugar Co-operatives’, Economic and Political Weekly 22(26): 38–56.Google Scholar
- Breman, J. (1978) ‘Seasonal Migration and Cooperative Capitalism: Crushing of Cane and Labour by Sugar Factories of Bardoli’, Economic and Political Weekly 13: 1317–1360.Google Scholar
- Breman, J. (1985) Of Peasants, Migrants and Paupers: Rural Labour Circulation and Capitalist Production in West India, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dreze, J. and Sen, A. (1995) India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- EJF (2007) The Children Behind Our Cotton, London, UK: Environmental Justice Foundation.Google Scholar
- Ellerman, D.P. (1988) ‘The Kantian Person/Thing Principle in Political Economy’, Journal of Economic Issues 22(4): 1109–1122.Google Scholar
- Gulati, G.M., Thomas Isaac, T.M. and Klein, W.A. (2002) ‘When a Workers’ Cooperative Works: The Case of Kerala Dinesh Beedi’, UCLA Law Review, 49: 5, Research Paper Series, No 02-13: 1417–1455.Google Scholar
- Heller, P. (1999) The Labor of Development: Workers and the Transformation of Capitalism in Kerala, India, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) (2011) ‘Statistical Information on the Co-operative Movement’, http://www.ica.coop/coop/statistics.html (accessed October 2011).
- Kannan, K.P. (1998) Political Economy of Labour and Development in Kerala: Some Reflections on the Dilemma of a Socially Transforming Labour Force in a Slow Growing Economy, Paper presented at a workshop in Centre for development studies, Trivandrum.Google Scholar
- Rajaram, N. (1999) ‘Politics and Cotton Cooperatives in Central Gujarat’, Economic and Political Weekly, July 24: 2095–2103.Google Scholar
- Schneiberg, M. and Lounsbury, M. (2008) ‘Social Movements and Institutional Analysis’, in Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K. and Suddaby, R. (eds.) The Handbook of Organisational Institutionalism, London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Shah, T., Gulati, A., Hemant, P., Shreedhar, Ganga. and Jain, R.C. (2009) ‘Secret of Gujarat’s Agrarian Miracle after 2000’, Economic & Political Weekly XLIV(52): 45–55.Google Scholar
- Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar