Workers’ Participation in a Globalized Market: Reflections on and from Mondragon



The Mondragon Cooperative Experience (MCE) is a general but recognized term that refers to the totality of contexts surrounding the Mondragon cooperatives in the Basque Country, Spain. The centrepiece of that movement and institution is the Mondragon Corporation (hereafter called simply Mondragon) – a large, diverse conglomerate of cooperatives federated into a cooperative group. There are 120 cooperatives in total, the majority of which are medium sized, representing four sectors: finance (banking and insurance); industry (including automotive, machine tools, appliances and electronics); distribution; and knowledge (including primary, secondary and tertiary education, plus 12 technical schools). Mondragon is currently the largest private firm in the Basque Country, in terms of both employees and sales, and the seventh largest private firm in Spain. The headquarters of the group, and indeed the seat of cooperative movement in the Basque Country, is the small city of Mondragón (in Spanish) or Arrasate in Euskara, the Basque language.


Basque Country Social Transformation Cooperative Movement General Council Governing Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altuna, L. (Coord.) (2008). La Experiencia Cooperativa De Mondragon: Una Síntesis General. Eskoriatza, Gipuzkoa: LANKI – Mondragon Unibertsitatea.Google Scholar
  2. Azkarraga, J. (2007). Mondragon ante la globalizatiÓn: la cultura cooperativa vasca ante el cambio de epoca. Eskoriatza, Gipuzkoa, Cuadernos de LANKI, no 2, Mondragon Unibertsitatea.Google Scholar
  3. Azkarraga, J. (2010). Educatión, Sociedad y Transformation Cooperativa. Aretxabaleta, Gipuzkoa: Gizabidea Fundazioa – Mondragon Unibertsitatea.Google Scholar
  4. Azkarraga, J. (2011). “La cooperativa Mondragon y la nueva forma de gestion economica”, El Ciudadano, noviembre de 2011 ( 2011/11/01/43395).
  5. Azurmendi, J. (1988). El Hombre Cooperativo. Aretxabaleta, Gipuzkoa: Otalora.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, P. (1976). Necessary elements for effective worker participation in decision making. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 10, 490–522.Google Scholar
  7. Cheney, G. (1995). Democracy in the workplace: Theory and practice from the perspective of communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 23, 167–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheney, G. (1997). The many meanings of “solidarity”: Negotiation of values in a worker-cooperative complex under pressure. In B. D. Sypher (Ed.), Case Studies in Organizational Communication: 2 (pp. 68–83). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Cheney, G. (1999 [2002]). Values at Work: Employee Participation Meets Market Pressure at Mondragón. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cheney, G. (2006). Democracy at work within the market: Reconsidering the potential. In V. Smith (Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 16: Worker Participation: Current Research and Future Trends (pp. 179–203). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheney, G. (2009). Las Cooperativas Ante La Crisis Económica Mundial: Responsabilidades Y Oportunidades En El Mercado Global Futuro. Mondragon/ Arrasate, Gipuzkoa: Gizabidea.Google Scholar
  12. Cheney, G., Christensen, L. T., Zorn, T. E. Jr. and Ganesh, S. (2011). Organizational Communication in an Age of Globalization: Issues, Reflections, Practices, 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cheney, G., Straub, J., Speirs-Glebe, L., Stohl, C., De Gooyer, D. Jr., Whalen, S., Garvin-Doxas, K. and Carlone, D. (1998). Democracy, participation, and communication at work: A multidisciplinary review. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 21. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Dahl, R. (1985). A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Errasti, A.M., Heras, I., Bakaikoa, B. and Elgoibar, P. (2003). The internation-alization of cooperatives: The case of MCC, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 553–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. García, O. (2006). La participatión en la empresa. Perspectiva histórica, perspectiva critica y perspectiva cooperativa. Eskoriatza: LANKI – Mondragon Unibertsitatea.Google Scholar
  17. Kasmir, S. (1996). The Myth of Mondragón. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Morrison, R. (1991). We Build the Road as We Travel. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Parker, M., Cheney, G., Fournier, V. and Land, C. (in press). The Routledge Handbook of Alternative Organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Permanent Commission of Mondragón, 2003, unpublished report, n.p.Google Scholar
  22. Sarasua, J. (2010). Mondragon en un nuevo siglo. Síntesis reflexiva de la experiencia cooperativa. Cuadernos de LANKI, no 3, Mondragon Unibertsitatea.Google Scholar
  23. Seashore, S. (1954). Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  24. Whyte, W. F. and Whyte, K. K. (1991). Making Mondragón, 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Williams, R. C. (2007). The Cooperative Movement: Globalization from Below. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Joseba Azkarraga Etxagibel, George Cheney and Ainara Udaondo 2012

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations