Advertisement

Going Underground: Workers’ Ownership and Control at Tower Colliery

Chapter
  • 132 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter addresses the nature and limits of an alternative model of work organization in a UK coal mine. It charts the history and progress of the Tower Colliery coal mine in South Wales as an historic form of industrial democracy – the worker-owned producer cooperative – across its 13-year existence as a productive mine under the ownership and direct control of its workers. It further explores the argument that workers’ cooperatives are significantly different to typical work organizations, in that they are social movements, and that research into their experience can make a relevant contribution to the discourses of work and the sociology of social movements.

Keywords

Social Movement Board Member Work Organization Social Space Union Membership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer, M. S. (1996) Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagguley, P. (2002) ‘Contemporary British Feminism: A social movement in abeyance?’, Social Movement Studies, 1 (2), pp. 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayat, A. (1991) Work, Politics and Power: An International Perspective on Workers’ Control and Self–Management. Zed Books. London.Google Scholar
  4. Buechler, S. M. (1999) Social Movements in Advanced Capitalism: The Political Economy and Cultural Construction of Social Activism. Oxford University Press. Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Cato, M. S. (2004) The Pit and the Pendulum: A Cooperative Future for Work in the South Wales Valleys. University of Wales Press. Cardiff.Google Scholar
  6. Cooke, P. (1985) ‘Class practices as regional markers’. In Gregory, D. and Urry, J. (Eds.), Social Relations and Spatial Structures. Macmillan. London.Google Scholar
  7. Crossley, N. (1999) ‘Working utopias and social movements: An investigation using case study materials from radical mental health movements in Britain’, Sociology, 33 (4), p. 809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crossley, N. (2002) Making Sense of Social Movements. Open University Press. Buckingham.Google Scholar
  9. Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (1999) Social Movements, an Introduction. Blackwell Publishing. Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Fligstein, N. (2001) Social Skills and the Theory of Fields. University of California. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  11. Gates, J. R. (1999) The Ownership Solution: Toward a Shared Capitalism for the Twenty–First Century. Penguin. London.Google Scholar
  12. Habermas, J. (1981) ‘New social movements’, Telos, 49, pp. 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyman, R. (1989) Strikes (4th Edition). Macmillan Press. Basingstoke & London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kelly, J. (1988) Trade Unions and Socialist Politics. Verso. London.Google Scholar
  15. Kelly, J. (1998) Rethinking Industrial Relations, Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves. Routledge. London.Google Scholar
  16. Kendall, W. (1969) The Revolutionary Movement in Britain 1900–21: The Origins of British Communism. Weidenfeld and Nicholson. London.Google Scholar
  17. Massey, D. (1984) Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production. Macmillan. London.Google Scholar
  18. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C. (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mellor, M., Hannah, J. and Stirling, J. (1988) Worker Co–Operatives in Theory and Practice. Open University Press. Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  20. Melucci, A. (1995) ‘The process of collective identity’. In Johnston, H. and Klndermans, B. (Eds.), Social Movements and Culture. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  21. Mouzelis, N. (1995) Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Routledge. London.Google Scholar
  22. O’Sullivan, T., Eve, J. and Edworthy, A. (2001) Tower of Strength: The Story of Tyrone O’sullivan and Tower Colliery. Mainstream Publishing. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  23. Pendleton, A. (2001) Employee Ownership, Participation and Governance: A Study of ESOPs in the UK. Routledge. London.Google Scholar
  24. rychitko, D. L. (1991) Marxism and Workers’ Self Management. Greenwood Press. Westport CT.Google Scholar
  25. Putnam, R. D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two–level games’, International Organization, 42 (3), pp. 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rutherford, T. (1988) ‘Industrial restructuring, local labour markets and social change: The transformation of South Wales’, Contemporary Wales, 4, pp. 9–44.Google Scholar
  27. Tilly, C. (1995) ‘Contentious repertoires in great Britain, 1758–1834’. In Traugott, M. (Ed.), Repertoires and Cycles of Contention. Duke University Press. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  28. Thompson, E. P. (1968) The Making of the English Working Class. Pelican. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  29. Traugott, M. (Ed.) (1995) Repertoires and Cycles of Contention. Duke University Press. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  30. Twain, M. (2009 [1894]) Pudd’nhead Wilson and Those Extraordinary Twins. Barnes and Noble. Lyndhurst, NJ. Classics Series.Google Scholar
  31. Unofficial Reform Committee. (1912) The Miners’ Next Step: Being a Suggested Scheme for the Reorganisation of the Federation. South Wales Miners Federation. Tonypandy.Google Scholar
  32. Webb, B. and Webb, S. (1897) Industrial Democracy. Trade Unionists of the United Kingdom. London.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, R. (1973) ‘Base and superstructure in marxist cultural theory’, New Left Review, November–December, (82), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Russell Smith, Len Arthur, Molly Scott Cato and Tom Keenoy 2012

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations