Advertisement

An Introduction to Theoretical Issues

Chapter

Abstract

There is a shared view among business people that it is common sense to organize work in a hierarchical, management-led way. Notwithstanding fashionable managerial programmes about employee participation and involvement (which in the best of cases collapse like sandcastles in the storm of economic crises), within capitalism, ‘management has the right to manage’. That somebody needs to be empowered in the interests of the business to make quick decisions and impose the execution of these on working people is a principle hardly contested and indeed commonly accepted by workers themselves as the normal state of affairs. This acceptance is further reinforced by a system of work organized on the basis of a separation between planning and execution that concentrates knowledge (and consequently decision-making power) in the hands of a few. This conception about the accepted, effective and thus ‘natural’ way of organizing work in our societies is so embedded in the way we live that to think about a different, more democratic, equalitarian, less hierarchical and authoritarian way of organizing work is at best treated as a utopia. Thus, in building a convincing argument about alternatives, the first point to make is about the pervasiveness of dominant social relations in shaping the organization of work. This necessarily implies a theoretical effort to criticize the existing organization of work before practical alternatives can be envisaged.

Keywords

Human Resource Management Work Organization Theoretical Issue Labour Process Labour Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atzeni, M. (2010), Workplace Conflict: Mobilization and Solidarity in Argentina, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atzeni, M. and Ghigliani, P. (2007), Labour process and decision making in factories under workers’ self-managment: Empirical evidence from Argentina, Work, Employment and Society, 21:4, 653–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldacchino, G. (1990), A war of position: Ideas on strategies for workers cooperative development, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 11:4, 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayat, A. (1991), Work, Politics and Power an International Perspective on Workers’ Control and Self-Management, London, Zed Books.Google Scholar
  5. Beynon, H. (1984), Working for Ford, Harmondsworth, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bolton, S. (2005), Emotion Management in the Workplace, Management, Work and Organisations, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Bolton, S. and Houlihan, M. (2009), Are we having fun yet? A consideration of workplace fun and engagement, Employee Relations, 31:6, 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braverman, H. (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital, New York, Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burawoy, M. (1979), Manufacturing Consent, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Burawoy, M. (1985), The Politics of Production. Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism, London, Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Cheney, G. (2002), Employee Participation Meets Market Pressure at Mondragon, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, G. A. (1983), The structure of proletarian unfreedom, reprinted in 1988 in a revised form in History, Labour and Freedom, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, S. (1987), A labour process to nowhere, New Left Review, available at http://www.newleftreview.org/?view=229 (accessed 4 February 2012).Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, S. (2006), Ramparts of Resistance: WhyWorkers Lost Their Power and How to Get It Back, London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, S. (2011), The red mole: Workers’ councils as a means to revolutionary transformation, in Ours to Master and to Own. Workers Control from the Commune to the Present, edited by Ness, I. and Azzellini, D., Chicago, Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  16. Delbridge, R. (1998), Life on the Line in Contemporary Manufacturing, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, P. (1986), Conflict atWork, a Materialist Analysis, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Edwards, P. and Scullion, H. (1982), The Social Organisation of Industrial Conflict, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Egan, D. (1990), Toward a Marxist theory of labor-managed firms: Breaking the degeneration thesis, Review of Radical Political Economics, 22:4, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elger, T. and Smith, C. (1994), Global Japanisation? The Transnational Transformation of the Labour Process, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Elger, T. and Smith, C. (2005), Assembling Work: Remaking Factories Regimes in Japanese Multinationals in Britain, New York, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fantasia, R. (1989), Culture of Solidarity. Consciousness, Action and Contemporary American Workers, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Guest, D. (2002), Human Resource Management, corporate performance and employee wellbeing: Building the worker into HRM, The Journal of Industrial Relations, 44:3, 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hyman, R. (1975), Industrial Relations, a Marxist Introduction, London, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyman, R. (2006), Marxist thought and the analysis of work, in Social Theory at Work, edited by Korczynski, M., Hodson, R. and Edwards, P., Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lebowitz, M. (2003), Beyond Capital, Marx’s Political Economy of the Working Class, second edition, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Lebowitz, M. (2004), What keeps capitalism going?, Monthly Review, 56:2, available at http://monthlyreview.org/2004/06/01/what-keeps-capitalism-going (accessed 4 February 2012).
  28. Linhart, R. (1981), The Assembly Line, Amherst, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  29. Lopez, H. S. (2010), Workers, managers, and customers triangles of power in work communities, Work and Occupation, 37:3, 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kochan, T. A. and Osterman, P. (1994), The Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership Among Labour, Management and Government, Cambridge, Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  31. Korczynski, M. (2002), Human Resource Management in Service Work, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Mandel, E. (1970), Self-management: Dangers and possibilities, International, 2:4, 3–9.Google Scholar
  33. Mandel, E. (1974), Control Obrero, Consejos Obreros, Autogestion, Mexico, Ediciones Era.Google Scholar
  34. Marx, K. (1976), Capital. volume 1, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  35. Marx, K. (1981), Capital. volume 3, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  36. Mellor, M., Hannah, J. and Stirling, J. (1988), Worker Co-Operatives in Theory and Practice, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Melnyk, G. (1985), The Search for Community, from Utopia to a Cooperative Society, Montreal-Buffalo, Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  38. Mollona, M. (2009), An Ethnography of Industrial Work and Politics, New York, Oxford, Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  39. Ness, I. and Azzellini, D. (2011), Ours to Master and to Own. Workers Control from the Commune to the Present, Chicago, Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  40. Pink, D. H. (2011), The Surprising Truth of What Motivates Us, New York, Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  41. Schneiberg, M., King, M. and Smith, T. (2008), Social movements and organizational form: Cooperative alternatives to corporations in the American insurance, dairy, and grain industries, American Sociological Review, 73:4, 635–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sherman, R. (2007), Class Acts: Service and Inequality in Luxury Hotels, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Silver, B. (2003), Forces of Labour, Workers Movement and Globalisation since 1870, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spencer, D. (2000), Braverman and the contribution of labour process analysis to the critique of capitalist production, twenty-five years on, Work, Employment and Society, 14:2, 223–243.Google Scholar
  45. Spencer, D. (2009), The Political Economy of Work, Abingdon, Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, M. (2008), Global Economy Contested: Power and Conflict Across the International Division of Labour, London and New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, P. and Bain, P. (2005), India calling to the far away towns the call center labour process and globalisation, Work Employment & Society, 19:2, 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson, P. (1989), The Nature of Work, second edition, Basingstoke, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thompson, P. and Smith, C. (2010), Working Life: Reviewing Labour Process Analysis, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Tinker, T. (2002), Spectres of Marx and Braverman in the twilight of postmodernist labour process research, Work Employment & Society, 16:2, 251–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turner, C. (1995), Japanese Workers in Protest: An Ethnography of Consciousness and Experience, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  52. Van der Linden, M. (2008), Workers of the World, Essays Toward a Global Labour History, Leiden, Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warhurst, C., Grugulis, I. and Keep, E. (2004), The Skills That Matter, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Willmott, H. D. (1990), Subjectivity and the dialectics of praxis: Opening up the core of labour process analysis in Labour Process Theory, edited by Knights, D. and Willmott, H., London, Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Maurizio Atzeni 2012

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations