Crafted by Crises: Regional Integration and Democracy in South America

  • Eric Mosinger
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


Over the last two decades, regionalism has gained increasing salience in international politics. Though the European Union (EU) has developed by far the most successful system of supranational governance, no part of the world matches South America for the sheer number and variety of attempts to create common markets and durable regional institutions. South American regional integration efforts as a whole have nearly as lengthy a lineage as their European inspiration. The most recent spate of integration efforts — the Alianza Bolivariana para los Pueblos de Nuestra América, Comunidad de Estados Latinamericanos y Caribeños, and above all, the Unión de Naciones Suramericanas (UNASUR) — build on half a century of uneven and incomplete projects, beginning with the Latin American Free Trade Association in 1960. The most notable include the Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR) and the Andean Community of Nations.


European Union Regional Integration Veto Player Multilevel Governance Andean Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnett, M. and Solingen, E. (2007) ‘Designed to Fail or Failure of Design? The Origins and Legacy of the Arab League’, in A. Acharya and A. I. Johnston (eds) Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Boniface, D. S. (2002) ‘Is There a Democratic Norm in the Americas? An Analysis of the Organization of American States’, Global Governance, 8: 365–381.Google Scholar
  3. Carpineta, M. L. (2008) ‘Apoyo de la OEA para La Paz’,–32569–2008-05–03.html, accessed 31 July 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Clapper, J. B. (2011) Statement for the Record on the Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 10 February 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Collier, D. and Levitsky, S. (1997) ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research’, World Politics, 49 (3): 430–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, A. F. and Legler, T. (2005) ‘A Tale of Two Mesas: The OAS Defense of Democracy in Peru and Venezuela’, Global Governance, 11: 425–444.Google Scholar
  7. Haas, E. (1958) The Uniting of Europe (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Hellinger, D. (2005) ‘When “No” Means “Yes to Revolution”: Electoral Politics in Bolivarian Venezuela’, Latin American Perspectives, 32 (3): 8–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hooghes, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).Google Scholar
  10. Hurrell, A. (1995) ‘Regionalism in the Americas’, in L. Fawcett and A. Hurrell (eds) Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Karl, T. L. (1990) ‘Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, 23 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krauss, C. (2000) ‘The World: Cold War Echoes; Our (and Their) Man in Peru’, New York Times, 8 October 2000,, accessed 31 July 2011.
  13. La (2008) ‘Crímenes de lesa humanidad en Pando’, La, 4 November 2008,, accessed 31 July 2011.
  14. Malamud, A. (2003) ‘Presidentialism and MERCOSUR: A Hidden Cause for a Successful Experience’, in F. Laursen (ed.) Comparative Regional Integration (Hampshire: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  15. Malamud, A. (2005) ‘MERCOSUR Turns 15: Between Rising Rhetoric and Declining Achievement’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18 (3): 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malamud, C. (2008) La Cumbre de Unasur en Santiago de Chile y el conflicto en Bolivia, Real Instituto Elcano, ARI Nº 121/2008, Madrid.Google Scholar
  17. Mansfield, E., Milner, H. and Pevehouse, J. (2008) ‘Democracy, Veto Players, and the Depth of Regional Integration’, World Economy, 31 (1): 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McMillan, J. and Zoido, P. (2004) ‘How to Subvert Democracy: Montesinos in Peru’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (4): 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moravcsik, A. (1993) ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31 (4): 473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Donnell, G. (1994) ‘Delegative Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 5 (1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pevehouse, J. (2005) Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Phillips, T. (2008) The Bolivian Crisis, the OAS, and UNASUR,, accessed 31 July 2011.Google Scholar
  23. Prensa Web RNV/Prensa Latina (2011) ‘Unasur tendrá vida jurídica a partir del próximo 11 de marzo’, Radio Nacional de Venezuela,, accessed 31 July 2011.
  24. Shaw, C. M. (2004) Cooperation, Conflict, and Consensus in the Organization of American States (New York: Palgrave MacMillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Solingen, E. (2008) ‘The Genesis, Design and Effects of Regional Institutions: Lessons from East Asia and the Middle East’, International Studies Quarterly, 52: 261–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone Sweet, A. and Sandholtz, W. (2011) Neofunctionalism and Supranational Governance, in E. Jones, A. Menon and S. Weatherill (eds) Oxford Handbook of the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  27. Temprano-Arroyo, H. (2003) ‘Prospects for Regional Monetary Integration in Latin America: A View from the EU’, Comparative Economic Studies, 45: 384–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Eric Mosinger 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Mosinger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations