Abstract
In his seminal contribution, Merton (1971) solved for the dynamic asset allocation of an expected utility maximizer in a continuous time setting and with an infinite horizon. He showed that when the agent derives utility from intermediate consumption, a closed form solution to the consumption/investment problem exists if the economy is affected by a state variable following a mean reverting process and perfectly positively correlated with the traded risky asset. Wachter (2002) showed that a closed form solution exists under finite horizon when the markets are still complete, that is when there is a perfect negative correlation between the traded risky asset and the state variable. In incomplete markets, a closed form solution is known to exist only when the agent derives utility solely from terminal wealth. Kim and Omberg (1996) consider a setting where a state variable following a mean reverting process is imperfectly correlated to the traded risky asset while the agent has utility only from terminal wealth. In this setting, they showed that a closed form solution exists. Recently, Liu (2007) extended the previous findings to the case where asset returns are quadratic in mean reverting state variables. He obtained explicit solutions in complete markets with intermediate consumption and in incomplete markets with only terminal wealth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, E., Hansen, L. P. and Sargent, T. (2003). A Quartet of Semigroups for Model Specification, Robustness, Prices of Risk and Model Detection. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (1), 68–123.
Avramov, D. (2002). Stock Return Predictability and Model Uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 64, 423–58.
Avramov, D. (2004). Stock Return Predictability and Asset Pricing Models. The Review of Financial Studies, 17, 699–738.
Barberis, N. (2000). Investing for the Long Run When Returns are Predictable. Journal of Finance 55. 225–64.
Brandt, M. and Clara, P. S. (2006). Dynamic Portfolio Selection by Augmenting the Asset Space. Journal of Finance, 61. 2187–217.
Brennan, M. and Xia, J. (2002). Dynamic Asset Allocation under Inflation. Journal of Finance, 57 (3), 1201–38.
Campbell, J. and Viceira, L. (1999). Consumption and Portfolio Decisions when Expected Returns Are Time Varying. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 433–95.
Cao, H., Wang, T. and Zhang, H. (2005). Model Uncertainty, Limited Market Participation and Asset Prices. Review of Financial Studies, 18, 1219–51.
DeMiguel, A-V., Garlappi, L. and Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient Is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22 (5), 1915–53.
Epstein, L.G. and Schneider, M. (2010). Ambiguity and Asset Markets. NBER Working Paper No. 16181.
Etner, J., Jeleva, M. and Tallon, J.-M. (2009). Decision Theory under Uncertainty. Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne No. 2009.64.
Gilboa, I., Postlewaite, A. W. and Schmeidler, D. (2008). Probability and Uncertainty in Economic Modeling. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 173–88.
Guidolin, M. and Rinaldi, F. (2010). Ambiguity in Asset Pricing and Portfolio Choice. Working Paper Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis and Manchester Business School.
Ju, N. and Miao, J. (2012). Ambiguity, Learning and Asset Returns. Econometrica, 80, 559–91.
Kim, T. and Omberg, E. (1996). Dynamic Nonmyopic Portfolio Behavior. Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1), 141–61.
Leippold, M., Trojani, F. and Vanini, P. (2008). Learning and Asset Prices under Ambiguous Information. Review of Financial Studies, 21, 2565–97.
Lettau, M. and Ludvigson, S. (2001). Consumption, Aggregate Wealth, and Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, LVI (3), 815–49.
Lioui, A., and Poncet, P. (2001). On Optimal Portfolio Choice under Stochastic Interest Rates. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25, 1141–865.
Liu, J. (2007). Portfolio Selection in Stochastic Environments. Review of Financial Studies, 20, 1–39.
Liu, J., Pan, J. and Wang, T. (2005). An Equilibrium Model of Rare Event Premia and Its Implication for Option Smirks. Review of Financial Studies, 18 (1), 131–64.
Maenhout, P. (2004). Robust Portfolio Rules and Asset Pricing. Review of Financial Studies, 17 (4), 951–83.
Maenhout, P. (2006). Robust Portfolio Rules and Detection-error Probabilities for a Mean-reverting Risk Premium. Journal of Economic Theory, 128 (1), 136–63.
Merton, R. (1971). Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous Time Model. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 373–413.
Sangvinatsos, A. and Wachter, J. (2005). Does the Failure of the Expectations Hypothesis Matter for Long Term Investors? Journal of Finance, LX (1), 179–230.
Uppal, R. and Wang, T. (2003). Model Misspecification and Underdiversification. Journal of Finance, 58 (6), 2465–86.
Wachter, J. (2002). Portfolio and Consumption Decisions under Mean Reverting Returns: An Exact Solution for Complete Markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 63–91.
Wachter, J. and Warusawitharana, M. (2009). Predictable Returns and Asset Allocation: Should a Skeptical Investor Time the Market? Journal of Econometrics, 148, 162–78.
Wakker, P. P. (2008). Uncertainty, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Abraham Lioui
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lioui, A. (2013). Robust Consumption and Portfolio Rules When Asset Returns Are Predictable. In: Batten, J.A., MacKay, P., Wagner, N. (eds) Advances in Financial Risk Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025098_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025098_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43874-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02509-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)