Skip to main content
  • 300 Accesses

Abstract

  • With more than pow’r of parliament you sit,

  • Despotic representatives of wit!

  • For in a moment, and without much pother,

  • You can dissolve this piece, and call another!

  • As ‘tis no treason, let us frankly see,

  • In what they differ, and in what agree,

  • The said supreme assembly of the nation,

  • With this our great Dramatic Convocation!

  • Business in both oft meets with interruption:

  • In both, we trust, no brib’ry or corruption;

  • Both proud of freedom, have a turn to riot,

  • And the best Speaker cannot keep you quiet.

English playwright John Burgoyne was not being entirely facetious when he wrote this prologue comparing the audience’s authority to that of Parliament. By most accounts, eighteenth-century English audiences had remarkable sovereignty over their arts experiences— from determining the actual flow of content during the event to making public judgment on its value, efficacy, and meaning afterward. They did indeed hold the power, in the manner of Parliament, to “dissolve this piece, and call another!” Part of that power came from the fertile nature of the venue-audience exchange; audience to performer, performer to audience, and intra-audience discourse all included a variety of approbative and disapprobative gestures that constituted an acceptable (indeed expected) standard of active behavior while inside eighteenth-century playhouses. But importantly, a significant part of the audience’s power arose from what I will call the audience-community exchange; the audiences’ participation, as individuals and as members of various subcultures, in a variety of activities centered on public meaning making and evaluation taking place outside of the playhouse or concert hall or gallery. As I illustrate later, prior to the twentieth-century acts of social interpretation were commonplace in Western society, taking the form of competitions, querelles, pamphlet wars, audience leagues, arts appreciation societies, and other public forums for discussion and debate over the meaning and value of a work of art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • L Hughes, The Drama’s Patrons: A Study of the Eighteenth-Century London Audience (Austin and London: University of Texas Press, 1971), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard Butsch, The Citizen Audience: Crowds, Publics, and Individuals (New York and London: Routledge, 2008), 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tony Bennett, The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew Gurr, Playgoing in Shakespeare’s London, Third Edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martha Feldman, Opera and Sovereignty (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 2007), 7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Susan Wollenberg and Simon McVeigh, Concert Life in Eighteenth-Century Britain (London: Ashgate Publishing, 2004), 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur Pickard-Cambridge, The Dramatic Festivals of Athens, Second Edition. Rev. John Gould and D. M. Lewis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), 272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederic William John Hemmings, The Theatre Industry in Nineteenth-Century France (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 129.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quoted in Calvin Tompkins, Merchants and Masterpieces: The Story of the Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1970), 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • John A. Davis, “Opera and Absolutism in Restoration Italy, 1815–1860,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History xxxvi, no. 4 (Spring 2006): 569–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James Johnson, Listening in Paris: A Cultural History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selma Jeanne Cohen, Dance as a Theatre Art: Source Readings in Dance History from 1581 to the Present (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Book Company, 1992), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Gross, Rogues’ Gallery: The Secret History of the Moguls and the Money that Made the Metropolitan Museum (New York: Broadway Books, 2009), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate Wilkinson, Memoirs of His Own Life. 4 vols. (London: Wilson, Spence, and Mawman, 1790), 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judith W. Fisher, “Audience Participation in the Eighteenth-Century London Theater,” in Audience Participation: Essays on Inclusion in Performance, ed. Susan Kattwinkel (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis Kennedy, The Spectator and the Spectacle: Audiences in Modernity and Postmodernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur Pickard-Cambridge, The Dramatic Festivals of Athens, Second Edition. Rev. John Gould and D. M. Lewis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), 273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melveena McKendric, Theatre in Spain, 1490–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey Ravel, The Contested Parterre: Public Theater and French Political Culture, 1680–1791 (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1999), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederic William John Hemmings, The Theatre Industry in Nineteenth-Century France (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 123, 126.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charles Dickens, Great Expectations: A Norton Critical Edition, ed. Edgar Rosenberg (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1999), 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quoted in Lynne Conner, Pittsburgh in Stages: Two Hundred Years of Theater (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2007), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence Levine, Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990), 92

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlotta Sorba, “To Please the Public: Composers and Audiences in Nineteenth-Century Italy,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History xxxvi, no. 4 (Spring 2006): 597.

    Google Scholar 

  • John A. Davis, “Opera and Absolutism in Restoration Italy, 1815–1860,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History xxxvi, no. 4 (Spring 2006): 582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Forrest Kelly, Five Nights: Five Musical Premieres (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000), 299.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Barton Baker, “Famous Theatrical Riots,” Belgravia: An Illustrated London Magazine 36 (July to October 1878), 482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Wilson, The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia: The Chorus, the City and the Stage (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert G. Allen, Horrible Prettiness: Burlesque and American Culture (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1991), 183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin Tompkins, Merchants and Masterpieces: The Story of the Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1970), 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot Forbes, Thayer’s Life of Beethoven (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1964), 187

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenneth Hamilton, After the Golden Age: Romantic Pianism and Modern Performance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver Daniel, Stokowski: A Counterpoint of View (New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1982), 288–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew Riley, Musical Listening in the German Enlightenment: Attention, Wonder and Astonishment (London: Ashgate, 2004), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jim Davis and Victor Emeljanow, Reflecting the Audience: London Theatre-going, 1840–1880 (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2001), 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paula M. Niedenthal, Lawrence W. Barsalou, Francois Ric, and Silvia Krauth-Gruber, “Embodiment in the Acquisition and Use of Emotion Knowledge,” in Emotion and Consciousness, eds., Lisa Feldman Barrett, Paula M. Niedenthal, and Piotre Winkielman (New York: Guilford Press, 2005), 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Carl R. Plantinga, Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • William Webber, “Did People Listen in the 18th Century?,” Early Music 25, no. 4 (Nov., 1997): 681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice L. Miller, Bohemians and Critics: American Theatre Criticism in the Nineteenth Century (Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1981), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard Butsch, The Making of American Audiences: From Stage to Television, 1750–1990 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peter Smith, “Ecology of Picture Study,” Art Education 38, no. 5 (September 1986): 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nick Rabkin and Eric Hedberg, Arts Education in America: What the Declines Mean for Arts Participation (Washington: National Endowment for the Arts, 2011), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy A. Scholes, Music Appreciation: Its History and Technics (New York: J. J. Little and Ives Company, 1935), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • William J. Baumol and William G. Bowen, Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Lynne Conner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conner, L. (2013). Eras of Social Interpretation. In: Audience Engagement and the Role of Arts Talk in the Digital Era. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023926_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics