Skip to main content
  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

In the second half of the nineteenth century, urban Russia witnessed sweeping demographic and cultural changes resulting from the end of serfdom, railroad construction, and industrialization. Most relevant to this study, wealthy merchants emerged as arts patrons and active participants in public cultural life. The state and nobility remained robust sources of patronage, to be sure, but the expansion of the art market and new entertainment enterprises, including private opera companies, signaled the growing involvement of “middling” social strata in commodified leisure. The Revolution of 1905, which brought the relaxation of censorship, a press boom, and further erosion of noble privilege and cultural authority, only accelerated these developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cultural theorist Raymond Williams used the concept “structure of feeling” to describe the emotional and interpretative relationships of a given historical period and place—“the deep community that makes communication possible.” Structure of feeling denotes modes of experiencing and reacting that are widely shared through various cultural forms, and not individually conceived. Raymond Williams, The Long Revolution (Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press Ltd., 2001), 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Susan Sontag, “Notes on Camp,” in Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject, ed. Fabio Cleto (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999), 54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boris Kolonitskii, “‘We’ and ‘I’: Alexander Kerensky in His Speeches,” in Autobiographical Practices in Russia / Auto biographische Praktiken in Russland, ed. Jochen Hellbeck and Klaus Heller (Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2004), 182; and

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richard Abraham, Alexander Kerensky: The First Love of the Revolution (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), 179.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Orlando Figes and Boris Kolonitskii, Interpreting the Russian Revolution: The Language and Symbols of 1917 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999), 86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For images of Nicholas II, see Richard Wortman, “Publicizing the Imperial Image in 1913,” in Self and Story in Russian History, ed. Laura Engelstein and Stephanie Sandler (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000), 109–10. On the desacralization of the monarchy and depictions of Nicholas as an unmanly, feckless, and immoral traitor, see Figes and Kolonitskii, Interpreting the Russian Revolution, 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peter Brooks, The Melodramatic Imagination: Balzac, James, Melodrama, and the Mode of Excess (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Julie A. Cassiday, The Enemy on Trial: Early Soviet Courts on Stage and Screen (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2000), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., 6–7. For discussions of melodrama and melodramatic performance in Soviet legal practice and film see Lars T. Lih, “Melodrama and the Myth of the Soviet Union,” in Imitations of Life: Two Centuries of Melodrama in Russia, ed. Louise McReynolds and Joan Neuberger (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002), 178–207; and

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Elizabeth A. Wood, Performing Justice: Agitation Trials in Early Soviet Russia (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005). On the importance of sincerity and other melodramatic imperatives in Party card verifications at academic institutions of the 1920s, see

    Google Scholar 

  11. Igal Halfin, Intimate Enemies: Demonizing the Bolshevik Opposition, 1918–1928 (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2007), 284–332.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Anna Fishzon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fishzon, A. (2013). Epilogue. In: Fandom, Authenticity, and Opera. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023452_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics