Abstract
A particular example of the application of Sippenhaft within the Wehrmacht was against German soldiers who, as prisoners of war, collaborated with the Soviet Union. These activities were most prominently focussed through the creation of the groups, the Nationalkomittee Freies Deutschland ‘National Free Germany Committee’ (NKFD) and the Bund Deutscher Offiziere ‘League of German Officers’ (BDO). The response of the Nazis and the Wehrmacht to these organizations defines the rela-tionship between Sippenhaft, the Wehrmacht High Command and the bomb plot of 20 July 1944. The way the Nazis dealt with the resistance of the NKFD/BDO affected their approach to Sippenhaft. The fact that these resistance activities were ongoing — unlike the 20 July bomb — presented special challenges to the Nazi regime and the Wehrmacht. For a great deal of time, at least publicly, the Nazis refused to acknowledge the activities of the NKFD/BDO, or believe that the propaganda activities, the broadcasts and articles produced were genuine. The version of Sippenhaft that was applied to career officers by the Army High Command before the events of 20 July 1944 was largely a ‘symbolic’ punishment of particular officers and their families, such as forcing a family to dissociate itself publicly from a ‘traitor’. However, there are indications that the families of lower-ranking officers linked to these groups were punished more severely.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Bodo Scheurig, Verrat Hinter Stacheldracht? Das Nationalkomitee ‘Freies Deutschland’ und der Bund Deutscher Offiziere in der Sowjetunion, 1943–1945 (München 1965), pp. 43–52.
Hitler, quoted 1 February 1943, in Helmut Heiber (ed), Lagerbesprechungen im Führerhauptquartier: Protokollfragmente aus Hitlers militärischen Konferenzen 1942–1945 (Berlin 1962), pp. 77 & 79–80.
James Carnes, A Study in Courage: General Walter von Seydlitz’ Opposition to Hitler (Michigan 1976), p. 264.
Bodo Scheurig (trans. Herbert Arnold), Free Germany: The National Committee and the League of German Officers (Middletown 1969), p. 80.
Sigrid Wegner-Korfes, Weimar-Stalingrad-Berlin: Das Leben des deuschen Generals Otto Korfes (Weiden 1994), p. 175.
Margot Bechler, Warten auf Antwort: Ein deutsches Schicksal (Hamburg 1990), p. 15.
An example of the acceptance that the BDO members were not coerced is found in the diary of the former Ambassador to Italy, Ulrich von Hassell. On 23 February 1944 he noted that it was obvious Lieutenant-General von Daniel was not under duress as one of the appeals he had signed was personally addressed to one of the divisional commanders who he had previously served with, ‘this kind of thing can’t be made up’. See von Hassell, The von Hassell Diaries: The Story of the Forces against Hitler inside Germany, 1938–1944 (Boulder 1994), p. 338.
Erich Manstein, Lost Victories (New York 1994), p. 532. Also Carnes, A Study in Courage, p. 342.
Wegner-Korfes, Weimar-Stalingrad-Berlin, p. 119 & pp. 191–2. Also interview with Katharina Lewerenz, July 1972 recorded in Kai Schoenhals, The Free Germany Movement: A Case of Patriotism or Treason? (New York 1989), p. 109. Although he states that only two of the von Seydlitz children were arrested, when it was actually all four of them. See also Richardi, SS-Geiseln in der Alpenfestung, p. 30.
Peter Joachim Lapp, General bei Hitler und Ulbricht: Vincenz Müller: eine deut-sche Karriere (Berlin 2003), p. 144. This was also despite Goebbels describing the wording of Müller’s capitulation document — where he ordered his troops to hand over their weapon intact to the Soviets — being the most shameful one he had ever read. TBJG 13, 17 July 1944, p. 128.
Rüdiger Wenke, ‘Rudolf Bamler: Karrierebuch in der Kasernierten Volkspolizei’ in Armin Wagner (ed.), Genosse General!: die Militärelite der DDR in biografischen Skizzen (Berlin 2003), p. 41.
Leonid Reschin, Feldmarschall Friedrich Paulus im Kreuzverhör 1943–1953 (Augsburg 2000), pp. 174f & 178f.
Wolfgang Leonhard, Child of the Revolution (London 1958), p. 279.
Heike Bungret, Das Nationalkomitee under der Westen: Die Reaktion der Westallierten auf das NKFD und die Freien Deutschen Bewegungen, 1943–1948 (Stuttgart 1997),
also A.J. Nicolls, ‘Book Review’, The American Historical Review, 105, 3 (June 2000), p. 1036.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Robert Loeffel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loeffel, R. (2012). Sippenhaft and the NKFD and the BDO. In: Family Punishment in Nazi Germany. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137021830_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137021830_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34450-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02183-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)