Advertisement

Building Strengths in Families and Communities

  • Robyn Munford
  • Jackie Sanders
  • Bruce Maden
Part of the Critical Cultural Studies of Childhood book series (CCSC)

Abstract

This chapter presents the experiences of one community-based agency, Te Aroha Noa, which has developed effective strategies for enhancing family and community well-being. The agency’s name is derived from te reo Māori (the indigenous language of New Zealand) and embraces the idea of unconditional love and care. Te Aroha Noa provides early childhood services alongside a range of other services and has developed innovative approaches for nurturing the strengths of families. It has also contributed to building the capacity of the community within which it is situated. For over two decades, the agency has worked intentionally to understand the diverse needs of the families that come to Te Aroha Noa and has developed creative strategies for responding to these needs. Strengths-based and community-development perspectives inform the work and focus attention upon positive change strategies that enhance family and child well-being. This chapter presents the agency’s experiences in developing an approach to practice that spans early childhood, family and community work, and adult education. It explores the key concepts that are central to this practice. The chapter draws on examples from the Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) center, which is located on the main site of the agency, and the parenting support and education programs provided to families that are delivered on-site and in-home.

Keywords

Wide Community Community Life Early Childhood Teacher Agency Staff Critical Realism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Archer, M. (2002). Realism and the problem of agency. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, M. (2007). Community-based parenting programmes: An exploration of the interplay between environmental and organizational factors in a Webster Stratton project. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, M., Brandon, M., Chaskin, R., Fernandez, E., Grietens, H., Lightburn, A., McNamara, P. M.…& Zeira, A. (2006). Identifying sensitive outcomes of interventions in community-based centres. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 9(1–2), 2–10.Google Scholar
  4. Bessarab, D., & Crawford, F. (2010). Aboriginal practitioners speak out: Contextualising child protection interventions. Australian Social Work, 63(2), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callaghan, G. (2008). Evaluation and negotiated order. Evaluation, 14(4), 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2007). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Duncan, J. (2008, August). Early childhood centres as places for family resilience and social capital. Presentation to the Treasury Series on Social Mobility, Wellington, NZ. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/media…/tgls-duncan-pres.pdf
  8. Duncan, B., Miller, S., & Sparks, J. (2004). The heroic client: A revolutionary way to improve effectiveness through client-directed, outcome-informed therapy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Durie, R., & Wyatt, K. (2007). New communities, new relations: The impact of community organization on health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 65(9), 1928–1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fetterman, D., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection: A resource handbook. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education, culture, power and liberation. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Gardner, F., Fook, J., & White, S. (2006). Critical reflection: Possibilities for developing effectiveness in conditions of uncertainty. In F. Gardner, J. Fook & S. White (Eds.). Critical reflection in health and social care (pp. 228–240). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gerald, R., & McDonald, E. (2010). Building community within the community: Government-community partnerships in the District of Columbia’s child welfare system. Social Work Now, 45, 8–14.Google Scholar
  15. Gilligan, R. (2004). Promoting resilience in child and family social work: Issues for social work practice. Social Work Education, 23, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray, M., Coates, J., & Yellow Bird, M. (2008). Introduction. In M. Gray, J. Coates & M. Yellow Bird (Eds.). Indigenous social work around the world: Towards culturally relevant education and practice (pp. 1–10). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Halvorsen, A. (2009). What counts in child protection and welfare? Qualitative Social Work, #(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Handley, K., Horn, S., Kaipuke, R., Maden, B., Maden, E.,…Sanders J. (2009). The Spinifex effect—A theory of change. Wellington, New Zealand: The Families Commission.Google Scholar
  19. Houston, S. (2010). Prising open the black box: Critical realism, action research and social work. Qualitative Social Work, 9(1), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hudson, C. (2000). At the edge of chaos—A new paradigm for social work? Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 215–230.Google Scholar
  21. Liebenberg, L., & Ungar, M. (2009). Introduction: The challenges in researching resilience. In L. Liebenberg & M. Ungar (Eds.). Researching resilience (pp. 3–25). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lightburn, A., & Warren-Adamson, C. (2006). Evaluating family centres: The importance of sensitive outcomes in cross-national studies. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 9(1–2), 11–25.Google Scholar
  23. Mataira, P. (2002). Treaty partnering: Establishment of a charter for Māori community based programmes. Te Komako, Social Work Review, 14 (2), 5–7.Google Scholar
  24. May, H., & Mitchell, L. (2009). Strengthening community-based early child-hood education in Aotearoa New Zealand: Report of the Quality Public Early Childhood Education Project. Wellington, NZ: NZEI Te Riu Roa.Google Scholar
  25. Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (with Andrew, A., Butler, P., & Ruwhiu, L.) (2003). Action research with families/whānau and communities. In R. Munford & J. Sanders (Eds.). Making a difference in families: Research that creates change (pp. 93–112). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  26. Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2005). Working with families: Strengthsbased approaches. In M. Nash, R. Munford & K. O’Donoghue (Eds.). Social work theories in action (pp. 158–173). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2008). Assessment of families. In W. Rowe & L. A. Rapp-Paglicci (Eds.). Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare: Social work practice (pp. 399–422). USA: Hoboken, NJ: W. John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2011). Embracing the diversity of practice: Indigenous knowledge and mainstream social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 25(1), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Munford, R., Sanders, J., & Maden, B. (2007). Blending whānau/family development, parent support and early childhood education programmes. Journal of Social Policy, 32, 72–86.Google Scholar
  30. Munford, R., & Walsh-Tapiata, W. (2005). Community development principles into practice. In M. Nash, R. Munford & K. O’Donoghue (Eds.). Social work theories in action (pp. 97–112). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Reed, J. (2007). Appreciative inquiry: Research for change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Reeler, D. (n.d.) A theory of social change and implications for practice, planning, monitoring and evaluation. Cape Town, South Africa: Community Development Resource Association.Google Scholar
  33. Ruch, G. (2005). Relationship-based practice and reflective practice: Holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work. Child & Family Social Work, 10 (2), 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruwhiu, L. (2009). Indigenous issues in Aotearoa New Zealand. In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.). Social work: Contexts and practice (pp. 107–120). South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sanders, J., & Munford R. (2010). Working with families: Strengths-based approaches. Wellington, NZ: Dunmore Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, M. (2011). Reading Bauman for social work. Ethics & Social Welfare, 5(1), 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M. Q. (2006). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Toronto, ON: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Judith Duncan and Sarah Te One 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robyn Munford
  • Jackie Sanders
  • Bruce Maden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations