Abstract
The multipolar and less predictable world that emerged after the Cold War, shaped by globalization and events like 9/11 and its consequences, has seen space capabilities gain importance and become a core element of a state’s strategic thinking.1 Strategic, here, refers to means that a state needs to reach its goals, objectives and desired outcomes in each of the seven areas of power defined by meta-geopolitics. As applied to space, it means that domestic politics, the economic situation, demographic trends, health and social conditions, access to natural resources, vulnerability to natural disasters, the availability of a highly skilled workforce and technological know-how, national military and security considerations, as well as diplomatic leverage will together determine the importance a state gives to a national space programme. It will decide how large it will be, the strategic priorities it will have and whether it will take a confrontational approach to the other actors in space. A wealthy country which considers its military power to be an important part of its national security may be more likely to allocate resources for the establishment of a space launch capacity than a less developed country that believes in neutrality. Similarly, an actor that is frequently threatened by environmental disasters such as hurricanes would be more likely to invest in environmental monitoring satellites.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. Lebeau (2008), ‘Space: The Routes of the Future’, Space Policy, vol. 24, issue 1, February, p. 43.
M. Sheehan (2007), The International Politics of Space (New York and London: Routledge), pp. 20–1.
D. D. Stine (2007), US Civilian Space Policy Priorities: Reflections 50 Years after Sputnik. CRS Report for Congress, December, http://books.google.ch/books?id=U2IAyxWVF0wC&printsec=frontcover&hl=en&source=gbs_ge_s ummary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false, date accessed 2 August 2011, p. 2.
Cf. W. D. Compton (1989), Where No Man Has Gone Before: A History of Apollo Lunar Exploration Missions, NASA Special Publication-4214, NASA History Series, http://www.solarviews.com/history/SP-4214/contents.html, date accessed 21 December 2010.
T. Hitchens (2003), Developments in Military Space: Movement Towards Space Weapons?, Centre for Defense Information, October, http://www.cdi.org/pdfs/space-weapons.pdf, date accessed 21 December 2010, p. 1.
Cf. F. G. Klotz (1998), Space, Commerce and National Security (New York: Council on Foreign Relations).
J. E. Shawn (1999), ‘The Influence of Space Power upon History (1944–1998)’, Air Power History, vol. 46, issue 4, Winter, pp. 20–9.
Cf. Klotz (1998), ‘Space, Commerce, and National Security’.
E. S. Waldrop (2003), ‘Integration of Military and Civilian Space Assets: Legal and National Security Implications’, unpublished LL.M. Dissertation, McGill University, http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/webclient/StreamGate?folder_id=0&dvs=1312278427011~816, date accessed 2 August 2011, p. 5.
Cf. Shawn (1999), ‘The Influence of Space Power upon History (1944–1998)’.
Sheehan (2007), The International Politics of Space, pp. 99–100.
British Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2006), ‘Military Uses of Space’, Postnote 273, December, http://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn273.pdf, date accessed 2 August 2011, pp. 1–4.
E. Sadeh (2010), ‘Towards a National Space Strategy’, Astropolitics, vol. 8, issue 2–3, p. 82.
M. S. Smith (2004), ‘US Space Programs: Civilian, Military and Commercial’, CRS Issue Brief for Congress, http://www.fas.org/spp/civil/crs/IB92011.pdf, date accessed 8 January 2011, pp. 1–17.
Lebeau (2008), ‘Space: The Routes of the Future’, p. 43.
P. Meyer (2006), ‘Opening Remarks’, Report of the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Conference (UNIDIR), Building the Architecture for Sustainable, 30–1 March (Geneva: United Nations Press), p. xxii.
RAND National Defense Research Institute (2006), National Security Space Launch Report (Santa Monica: RAND Corporation), http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2006/RAND_MG503.pdf, date accessed 8 January 2011, pp. 2–3.
R. Skaar (2007), ‘Commercialisation of Space and its Evolution: Will New Ways to Share Risks and Benefits Open Up a Much Larger Space Market?’, European Space Policy Institute Report 4, May, http://www.espi.or.at/images/stories/dokumente/studies/commercialisation.pdf, date accessed 8 January 2011, p. 9.
J. A. Giacalone (2008), ‘Global Trends in the Commercialization of Spacem’, Journal of Business & Economics Research, vol. 6, issue 8, http://cluteonline.com/journals/index.php/JBER/article/view/2462/2508, date accessed 2 August 2011, pp. 65–76.
Space Foundation (2008), The Space Report 2008: The Authoritative Guide to Global Space Activity, Executive Summary, http://www.contentfirst.com/past/Spacefoundation/08executivesummary.pdf, date accessed 2 August 2011, p. 8.
Giacalone (2008), ‘Global Trends in the Commercialization of Space’, p. 68.
Skaar (2007), ‘Commercialisation of Space and Its Evolution’, p. 27.
Sadeh (2010), ‘Towards a National Space Strategy’, p. 80.
D. Wright, L. Grego and L. Gronlund (2005), The Physics of Space Security: A Reference Manual (Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, http://www.amacad.org/publications/Physics_of_Space_Security.pdf, date accessed 8 January 2010, p. 16.
E. Sadeh (2011), ‘Space and the Environment’, in C. D. Lutes, P. L. Hays (eds), with V. A. Manzo, L. M. Yambric and M. E. Bunn, Toward a Theory of Spacepower: Selected Essays (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press), http://www.ndu.edu/press/spacepower.html, date accessed 6 June 2011, pp. 252–276.
B. Warf (2007), ‘Geopolitics of the Satellite Industry’, Tijdschrift voor Economishe en Sociale Geographe, vol. 98, issue 3, http://www2.ku.edu/~geography/Docs/Barney%20papers/satellite%20geopolitics.pdf, date accessed 2 August 2011, p. 385.
A. Bhaskaranarayana, C. Varadarajan and V. S. Hedge (2009), ‘Space-Based Societal Applications: Relevance in Developing Countries’, Acta Astronautica, vol. 65, issue 9–10, November–December, p. 1479.
K. R. Sridhara Murthi, A. Bhaskaranarayana and H. N. Madhusudana (2010), ‘New Developments in Indian Space Policies and Programmes: The Next Five Years’, Acta Astronautica, vol. 66, issue 3–4, p. 335.
Bhaskaranarayana et al. (2009), ‘Space-Based Societal Applications’, p. 1480.
Murthi et al. (2010), ‘New Developments in Indian Space Policies and Programmes’, p. 334.
Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), ‘About ISRO’, http://www.isro.org/scripts/Aboutus.aspx, date accessed 2 August 2011.
For detailed information about Indian space infrastructure, see Bhaskaranarayana et al. (2009), ‘Space-Based Societal Applications’, pp. 1479–85.
H. V. Pant and G. Bharath (2008), ‘India’s Emerging Missile Capability: The Science and Politics of Agni-III’, Comparative Strategy, vol. 27, issue 4, July-September, pp. 378–9.
Murthi et al. (2010), ‘New Developments in Indian Space Policies and Programmes’, p. 334.
Bhaskaranarayana et al. (2009), ‘Space-Based Societal Applications’, p. 1481.
Sheehan (2007), The International Politics of Space, p. 147.
Bhaskaranarayana et al. (2009), ‘Space-Based Societal Applications’, pp. 1483–4.
Murthi et al. (2010), ‘New Developments in Indian Space Policies and Programmes’, p. 334.
Sheehan (2007), The International Politics of Space, p. 147.
Murthi et al. (2010), ‘New Developments in Indian Space Policies and Programmes’, p. 334.
Bhaskaranarayana et al. (2009), ‘Space-Based Societal Applications’, p. 1481.
Lebeau (2008), ‘Space: The Routes of the Future’, p. 43.
S. Pagkratis (2011), Space Policies, Issues and Trends in 2010/2011, ESPI Report 35(Vienna: ESPI), p. 23.
P. Tarikhi (2009), ‘Iran’s Space Programme: Riding High for Peace and Pride’, Space Policy, vol. 25, issue 3, p. 161.
U. Rubin (2006), The Global Reach of Iran’s Ballistic Missiles, Memorandum 86, Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), Tel Aviv University, http://www.inss.org.il/upload/(FILE)1188302022.pdf, date accessed 2 August 2011, p. 45.
Tarikhi (2009), ‘Iran’s Space Programme’, p. 163.
Tarikhi (2009), ‘Iran’s Space Programme’, p. 172.
Cf. National Academy of Science (1997), ‘The Global Positioning System: The Role of Atomic Clocks’, Beyond Discovery: The Path from Research to Human Benefit (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press), http://www.beyonddiscovery.org/content/view.page.asp?I=1275, date accessed 8 January 2011.
B. M. DeBlois, R. L. Garwin, R. S. Kemp and J. C. Marwell (2004), ‘Space Weapons: Crossing the US Rubicon’, International Security, vol. 29, issue 2, p. 65.
Wright et al. (2005), The Physics of Space Security, p. 165.
European Commission (2010), ‘Action Plan on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Applications’, Communication from the Commission to the Council, European Parliament, European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0308:FIN:EN:PDF, date accessed 7 March 2011, p. 3.
European Commission (2010), ‘Action Plan on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Applications’, p. 3.
Lembke (2001), ‘The Politics of Galileo’, p. 30.
Book description from editor page about Alexander Bolonkin (2005), Non-Rocket Space Launch and Flight (Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.), http://www.nextag.com/Non-rocket-Space-Launch-1230268695/specs-html, date accessed 12 April 2011.
P. V. Panetta (1998), ‘NASA-GSFC Nano-Satellite Technology Development’, Paper presented at the 12th AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 23–6 August 1998, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, http://www.smallsat.org/proceedings/12/ssc98/6/sscvi5.pdf, date accessed 3 August 2011, pp. 1–2.
M. Othman (2003), ‘Small Satellites for the Benefit of Developing Countries’, Acta Astronautica, vol. 52, issue 9–12, pp. 687–90.
Othman (2003), ‘Small Satellites for the Benefit of Developing Countries ’, p. 690.
M. Othman (2002), ‘Keynote Address: The Small Satellite Business: Contributions to, and from, Developing Countries’, in M. J. Rycroft and N. Crosby (eds), Smaller Satellites: Bigger Business?: Concepts, Applications and Markets for Micro/Nano Satellites in a New Information World (New York: Springer), p. 2.
L. A. Fisk (2008), ‘The Impact of Space on Society: Past, Present and Future’, Space Policy, vol. 24, issue 4, November, p. 180.
N. Peter (2009), ‘Space Power and Europe in the 21st Century’, European Space Policy Institute Perspectives 21, April, http://www.espi.or.at/images/stories/dokumente/Perspectives/ESPI_Perspectives_21.pdf, date accessed 27 July 2011, p. 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Nayef R. F. Al-Rodhan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Al-Rodhan, N.R.F. (2012). Space Technology and Meta-Geopolitics. In: Meta-Geopolitics of Outer Space. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016652_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016652_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33967-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01665-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)