Skip to main content

Abstract

The concept of fairness and justice at work in organizations can be traced back to the 1960s, predominantly with the work of US-based researchers Homans (1961) and Adams (1965). Early research was dominated by testing equity theory and seeing some of its implications. However, the new sub-discipline of organizational justice really took off in the 1980s and 1990s, particularly with the work of Greenberg (1987, 1996, 2001, 2003) as well as the establishment of the journal Social Justice Research in 1987, which often contains articles about justice at work (van der Toorn, Berkics & Jost, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange’. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psycholog, (vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M. & Bies, R. J. (2001). ‘How employees respond to personal offense: the effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 52–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bal, P. M., de Lange, A. H., Ybema, J. F., Jansen, P. G. & van der Velde, M. E. (2010). ‘Age and trust as moderators in the relation between procedural justice and turnover: a large-scale longitudinal study’. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, P. & Belogolovsky, E. (2010). ‘The impact of pay secrecy on individual task performance’. Personnel Psychology, 63: 965–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayram, N., Gursakal, N. & Bilgel, N. (2009). ‘Counterproductive work behavior among white-collar employees: a study from Turkey’. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17: 180–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugré, C. D. (2009). ‘Exploring the neural basis of fairness: a model of neuro-organizational justice’. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 110: 129–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blader, S. & Tyler, T. (2003). ‘What constitutes fairness in work settings?’ Human Resource Management Review, 13: 107–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. C., McWha, I., MacLachlan, M. & Furnham, A. (2010). ‘International-local remuneration differences across six countries: do they undermine poverty reduction work?’ International Journal of Psychology, 45, 5: 321–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Celani, A., Deutsch-Salamon, S., & Singh, P. (2008). ‘In justice we trust: a model of the role of trust in the organization in applicant reactions to the selection process’. Human Resource Management Review, 18: 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colella, A., Paetzold, R., Zardkooki, A. & Wesson, M. (2007). ‘Exposing pay secrecy’. Academy of Management Review, 32: 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R. & Greenberg, J. (1997). ‘Progress in organizational justice’. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (vol. 12, pp. 317–72). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dailey, R. & Kirk, D. (1992). ‘Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover’. Human Relations, 45: 305–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D. (2000) Fraud Watch. London: ABG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayan, M., Al-Tamimi, H. A. & Elhadji, A. L. (2008). ‘Perceived justice and customer loyalty in the retail banking sector in the UAE’. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 12: 320–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dbaibo, D., Harb, C. & van Meurs, N. (2010). ‘Values and justice as predictors of perceived stress in Lebanese organizational settings’. Applied Psychology: an International review, 58, 4: 701–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., Brockner, J., Fishman, A., van Dijke, M., van Olffen, W. & Mayer, D. M. (2010). ‘When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees’ work attitudes and behaviours? The moderating effect of uncertainty’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 2: 291–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J., & Schalk, R. (2010). ‘Extrinsic motives as moderators in the relationship between fairness and work-related outcomes among temporary workers’. Journal of Business Psychology, 25: 175–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J. H. & Martocchio, J. J. (1998). ‘Employee perceptions of the fairness of work group incentive pay plans’. Journal of Management, 24, 4: 469–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everton, W. J., Kenexa, J. A. & Mastrangelo, P. M. (2007). ‘Be nice and fair or else: Understanding reasons for employees’ deviant behaviors’. Journal of Management Development, 26: 117–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrinho, P. & van Lerberghe, W. (2002). Managing health professionals in the context of limited resources: A fine line between corruption and the need for moonlighting. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, D. (2002). Taking the Measure of Work. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. & Smith, P. B. (2006). ‘Who cares about justice? The moderating effect of values on the link between organisational justice and work behaviour’. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 4: 541–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2003). ‘Belief in a just world’. Personality and individual differences, 34: 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2005). ‘The justice motive in adolescents and young people’. Social Justice Research, 18, 203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2009). People management in turbulent times. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2010). ‘Culture shock: literature review, personal statement, and relevance for the South Pacific’. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 4, 2: 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. & Argyle, M. (1998). The psychology of money. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. & Petrides, K.V. (2006). ‘Deciding on promotions and redundancies’. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21: 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Taylor, J. (2011). Bad apples. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M. & Aycan, Z. (2007). ‘Cross-cultural organisational behaviour’. Annual Review of Psychology, 58: 479–514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gigantesco, A. (2011). ‘Justice at work and psychiatric morbidity among the personnel of an Italian hospital’. Community Mental Health Journal, 47, 341–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goncalo, J. A. & Kim, S. H. (2010). ‘Distributive justice beliefs and group idea generation: Does a belief in equity facilitate productivity?’ Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 836–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). ‘A taxonomy of organizational justice theories’. Academy of Management Review, 12: 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1996). The quest for justice on the job. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2001). ‘Setting the justice agenda: seven unanswered questions about “what, why and how”’. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 58: 210–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2003). ‘Creating unfairness by mandating fair procedures’. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, M., Buunk, B. P. & Van de Vliert, E. (2002). ‘Do just world believers process unfair authoritative decisions differently?’ Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 1, 126–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holz, B. & Harold, C. (2011). ‘Interpersonal justice and deviance’. Journal of Management, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1961). Social behaviour: its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, M. K. & Au, K. (2001). ‘Justice Perceptions of complaint-handling: a cross-cultural comparison between PRC and Canadian customers’. Journal of Business research, 52: 161–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huseman, R., Hatfield, J. & Miles, E. (1987). ‘A new perspective on equity theory: the equity sensitivity concept’. Academy of Management Review, 12: 222–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T-Y. & Leung, K. (2007). ‘Forming and reacting to overall fairness: a cross-cultural comparison’. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 104: 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2010). ‘Can professions contribute to the reduction of world wide poverty’. International Journal of Psychology, 45: 371–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. & Welchans, T. (2000). ‘The winding road from employee complainant’. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 45: 557–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLachlan, M., Carr, S. C. & McAuliffe, E. (2010). The aid triangle: recognising the human dynamics of dominance, justice and identity. New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marai, L. (2002, 2003). ‘Double de-motivation and negative social affect among teachers in Indonesia’. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 14: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative justice: an overview. London: Home Office Research Dept.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2007). ‘Cultural psychology of moral development’. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen. (Eds), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 477–99). London: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngodo, O. (2008). ‘Procedural justice and trust: The link in the transformational leadership-Organizational outcomes relationship’. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 4: 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offermann, L. R. & Hellman, P. S. (1996). ‘Leadership behaviour and subordinate stress: A 360 view’. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1: 382–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, M. (2006). ‘A cross-section analysis of the fairness-of-pay perception of UK employees’. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35: 243–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. L., Bigley, G. A. & Branyiczki, I. (1998). ‘Procedural justice as modernism: placing industrial/organisational psychology in context’. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 3: 371–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A. & Cunha, M. P. (2010). ‘Organisational justice and citizenship behaviours: a study in the Portuguese cultural context’. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59, 3: 404–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saner, R. (2010). ‘Decent work and decent pay’. International Journal of Psychology, 45: 376–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M. & Maes, J. (2010). ‘The justice sensitivity instrument’. Social Justice Research, 23: 211–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M. & Sharlit, B. (1992). ‘A field study of employees’ attitudes and behaviours after promotion decisions’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 511–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiraev, E. & Levy, D. (2004). Cross cultural psychology. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, T. (2004). ‘Equity sensitivity theory’. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19: 722–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P., Pandey, J., Tiwari, S., Pandey, K. & Maurya, P. (2009). ‘Perceived justice of available opportunities and self-esteem, collective esteem and social exclusion: A study of three religious groups in India’. Psychological Studies, 54: 124–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. & Furnham, A. (2005). Dishonesty at work. London: Social Affairs Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J. (2000). ‘Consequences of abusive supervision’. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 178–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Toorn, Berkics & Jost, J. (2010). ‘System justification, satisfaction, and perceptions of fairness and typicality at work’. Social Justice Research, 23: 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijke, M. & De Cremer, D. (2010). ‘Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: leader benevolence or follower control?’ Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46: 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lerberghe, W., Conceiçao, van Damme, W. & Ferrinho, P. (2002). ‘When staff is underpaid: Dealing with the individual coping strategies of health personnel’. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 80, 7: 581–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwiebe, R. & Wegener, B. (2000). ‘Social inequality and the perceived income justice gap’. Social Justice Research, 13, 2: 123–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, K. & Williams, K. J. (2010). ‘Organisational justice, trust and perceptions of fairness in the implementation of agenda for change’. Radiography, 17, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, T. W., Keung, C. W. & Wong, K. T. (2011). ‘Application of equity sensitivity theory to problem-solving approaches in construction dispute negotiation’. Journal of Management in Engineering, 8: 40–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellars, B. J., Tepper, B. J. & Duffy, M. K. (2002). ‘Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organisational citizenship behaviour’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 1068–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Adrian Furnham

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Furnham, A. (2012). Justice at Work. In: Carr, S.C., MacLachlan, M., Furnham, A. (eds) Humanitarian Work Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015228_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics