Abstract
In this chapter we identify and discuss important elements of Employee-Driven Innovation (EDI), and show how the interrelationship between professional role performance, cultural characteristics, and supportive means and tools is central in this respect. Drawing on data from 20 Norwegian enterprises known for their productive involvement of employees in innovation work, we discuss how leaders, employees and union representatives can carry out their work and use various means and tools to encourage the development of cultural characteristics essential for successful EDI practices. Our study indicates that EDI is mainly about how managers and employees see and perform their roles, and less about formal structures. There are several organizational efforts that can be made to support the development of a culture for joint innovation effort, but improved innovation capacity through the implementation of EDI practices requires the successful inter-play between all three dimensions (roles, culture and tools).
Keywords
- Cultural Change
- Innovation Management
- Cultural Characteristic
- Professional Role
- Harvard Business Review
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. (1987). ‘Innovation, market structure, and firm size’. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567–574.
Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding Organizational Culture. London: Sage Publications.
Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S. (2008). Changing Organizational Culture. Cultural Change Work in Progress. London: Routledge.
Axtell, C.M., Holman, D.J., Unsworth, K.L., Wall, T.D., Waterson, P.E. and Harrington, E. (2000). ‘Shopfloor innovation: facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas’. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285.
Black, S. and Lynch, L. (2001). ‘How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 434–445.
Byrne, C.L., Mumford, M.D., Barrett, J.D. and Vessey, W.B. (2009). ‘Examining the leaders of creative efforts: what do they do, and what do they think about?’ Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(4), 256–268.
Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I. and Tsakanikas, A. (2004). ‘Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?’ Technovation, 24, 29–39.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
De Brentani, U. (2001). ‘Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success’. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3), 169–187.
De Jong, J.P.J. and Kemp, R. (2003). ‘Determinants of co-workers’ innovative behaviour: an investigation into knowledge intensive services’. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(2), 189–212.
Dougherty, D. and Hardy, C. (1996). ‘Sustained product innovation in large mature organizations: overcoming innovation-to-organization problems’. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153.
Drucker, P.F. (2002 [1985]). ‘The discipline of innovation’. Harvard Business Review, August, 95–102.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). ‘Five misunderstandings about case-study research’. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–145.
Freeman, C. and Soete, L. (2000). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. 3rd edn. Boston, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Gaskell, G. (2000). ‘Individual and group interviewing’. In Bauer, M.W. and Gaskell, G. (Eds) Qualitative Researching — With Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage Publications.
Goffin, K. and Mitchell, R. (2005). Innovation Management: Strategy and Implementation Using the Pentathlon Framework. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Grant, R.M. (1991). ‘The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation’. California Management Review, 33, 114–135.
Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Hargadon, A. (2003). How Breakthroughs Happen. The Surprising Truth about How Companies Innovate. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Heller, F., Pusic, E., Strauss, G. and Wilpert, B. (1998). Organizational Participation: Myth and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaffee, D. (2001). Organization Theory. Tension and Change. Boston, Massachusetts: McGraw Hill.
Kanter, R.M. (1983). The Change Masters. Boston, Massachusetts: Unwin Paperbacks.
Kanter, R.M. (1988). ‘When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization’. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169–211.
Kelley, B. (2010). Stoking Your Innovation Bonfire. Chichester: Wiley.
Kelley, T. with Littman, J. (2005). The Ten Faces of Innovation: IDEO’s Strategies for Defeating the Devil’s Advocate and Driving Creativity Throughout Your Organization. New York: Currency.
Meyer, J.W. and Allen, N.J. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research and Application. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Morrow, S.L. (2005). ‘Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology’. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260.
Neely, A., Fillipini, R., Forza, C., Vinelli, A. and Hii, J. (2001). ‘A framework for analyzing business performance, firm innovation and related contextual factors. Perceptions of managers and policy makers in two European regions’. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12, 114–124.
Østberg, L., Robinson, A.G. and Schroeder, D.M. (2010). Små ideer — stora resultat. SIS Förlag.
Pelz, D.C. (1956). ‘Some social factors related to performance in research organizations’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 310–325.
Powell, W.W. (1998). ‘Learning from collaboration: knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries’. California Management Review, 40(3), 228–240.
Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990). ‘The core competence of the corporation’. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–93.
Quinn, J.B. (1985). ‘Managing innovation: controlled chaos’. Harvard Business Review, 63, 73–84.
Rismark, M. and Sølvberg, A.M. (2007). ‘Effective dialogues in driver education’. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39, 600–605.
Rothwell, R. (1994). ‘Towards the fifth-generation innovation process’. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7–31.
Schofield, J.W. (2002). ‘Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research’. In Huberman, A.M. and Miles, M.B. (Eds) The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Smith, P., Kesting, P. and Ulhøi, J.P. (2008). ‘What are the driving forces of employee-driven innovation?’ Presented at the 9th International CINet Conference, Valencia, Spain, 5–9 September.
Tidd, J. and Bessant, J. (2009). Managing Innovation. Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change. 4th edn. Chichester: Wiley.
Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. and Graen, G.B. (1999). ‘An examination of leadership and employee creativity: the relevance of traits and relationships’. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620.
Van de Ven, A.H., Angle, H.L. and Poole, M.S. (Eds) (2000[1989]). Research on the Management of Innovation. The Minnesota Studies. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
Verona, G. and Ravasi, D. (2003). Unbounding dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 577–606.
von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of lnnovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Boston: MIT Press.
Wilkinson, A. and Dundon, T. (2010). ‘Direct employee participation’. In Wilkinson, A., Gollan, P.J., Marchington, M. and Lewin, D. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E. and Griffin, R.W. (1993). ‘Toward a theory of organizational creativity’. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Tone Merethe Aasen, Oscar Amundsen, Leif Jarle Gressgård and Kåre Hansen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aasen, T.M., Amundsen, O., Gressgård, L.J., Hansen, K. (2012). In Search of Best Practices for Employee-Driven Innovation: Experiences from Norwegian Work Life. In: Høyrup, S., Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Hasse, C., Lotz, M., Møller, K. (eds) Employee-Driven Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014764_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014764_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32645-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01476-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)