Skip to main content

Power and the Unacceptable

  • Chapter
The Unacceptable

Abstract

The unacceptable is a grey zone. We are used to identifying the unacceptable with what is proscribed, forbidden, censored and banned. Yet this implies a juridical model of power as command and repression and a ‘police’ complex to secure and enforce the ban. What is unacceptable often finds itself under the ban, such as a film rejected by a censorship board. On many occasions, however, the unacceptable falls short of what essentially is a juridical-theological model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio, The Signature of All Things: On Method, New York: Zone Books, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, Stewart, ‘Foundations of Organization Power’, in Power: State of the Art (edited by Mark Haugaard and Kevin Ryan), International Political Science Association World of Political Science series, Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robert, The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century, New York: Grove Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Mitchell, ‘The signature of power’, Journal of Political Power, 2012, 5 (1), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, ‘Preface’ to G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1983, pp. xiii–xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, ‘Film and Popular Memory’, in Foucault Live, New York: Semiotext(e), 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, ‘Questions of Method’, in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (edited by Graham Burchell et al.), Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991, pp. 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, The Government of Self and Others, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, The Courage of Truth: The Government of Self and Others II, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, Barry, Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault, Oxford: Blackwells, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort, Mette, and Bondebjerg, Ib, The Danish Directors, Bristol: Intellect, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, Ian, Hitler: 1889–1936 Hubris, London: Penguin, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, Michael, Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetto, Kriss, The Unmaking of Fascist Aesthetics, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nikolas, and Miller, Peter, Governing the Present: Administering Social, Economic and Personal Life, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Mitchell Dean

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dean, M. (2013). Power and the Unacceptable. In: Potts, J., Scannell, J. (eds) The Unacceptable. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014573_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics