Abstract
Born in the period of Kurosawa’s rise to fame and Kiarostami’s university education, Joel and Ethan Coen produce films for a completely different cultural world. These two Midwestern American Jewish boys were bred on long winters and boredom, and they grew up with both the existential companionship of Hollywood film and the cultural dynamics of postmodernism. Almost all of the Coen films align with the postmodernism penchant for disruption, parody, and perversion of borders, as evidenced by the playful genre transgressions of their films but also by their split distribution between Hollywood and “real” independent theaters. The brothers are known for early production contract with Circle Films, a savvy contract that allowed them to make three films precisely as they envisioned. They were thus able to thumb their noses at big studio productions,2 and yet still secure a wide crossover reception for their films.3 The brothers’ ability to straddle elite, “art-house “ theatres and mall megaplexes demonstrates that though they sully the surface of categories, genres, cinematic codes, and audience expectations, they also keep their films light-hearted enough (or gory enough) to please broad audiences. Cineastes adore their relentless interfilm citations and insider jokes, while the wo/man-on-the-street savors their vulgarity and apparent disdain for the respectable bourgeoisie.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Adriana Cavarero, Relating Narrative: Storytelling and Selfhood, trans. Paul A. Kottman (New York: Routledge, 1997), 1.
Mark Bould, Film Noir: From Berlin to Sin City, Short Cut series (New York: Wallflower, 2005), 96.
R. Barton Palmer, “The New Sincerity of Neo-Noir: The Example of The Man Who Wasn’t There,” in The Philosophy of Neo-Noir, ed. Mark T. Conard (Lexington: University of Kentucky, 2007), 151 — 166.
Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, trans. Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1989), 12.
See R. Barton Palmer, ed., “Uncertainty Principle: The Man Who Wasn’t There,” in Joel and Ethan Coen (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2004), 62–79.
See Richard Gaughran, “‘What Kind of Man Are You?’: The Coen Brothers and Existential Role Playing,” in The Philosophy of the Coen Brothers, ed. Mark T. Conard (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 2009).
Steven Carter, “‘Flare to White’: Fargo and the Postmodern Turn,” Literature Film Quarterly 27, no. 4 (1999): 238–244.
Compare, in Lacan, that woman doesn’t have the phallus but is the phallus, that is, woman embodies the desire for fullness, wholeness, completeness of which simply having the phallus falls short. Birdy is to Ed precisely this site of projection and wish-fulfillment. See Jacques Lacan, “The Signification of the Phallus,” in Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, trans. Bruce Fink (New York: W. W. Norton, 2006), 575–584.
George Bataille, A Theory of Religion, trans. Robert Hurley (New York: Zone Books, 1989), 17–26.
Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1, trans. Ben Fowkes (New York: Penguin, 1990), 253.
Copyright information
© 2011 M. Gail Hamner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hamner, M.G. (2011). Joel and Ethan Coen: Searching for a Way Out; Alienation and Intimacy in The Man Who Wasn’t There (2001). In: Imaging Religion in Film. New Approaches to Religion and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137013248_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137013248_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34240-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01324-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)